Genetic Meningococcal Antigen Typing System (gMATS): A genotyping tool that predicts 4CMenB strain coverage worldwide
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
30661831
DOI
10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.12.061
PII: S0264-410X(19)30032-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- 4CMenB vaccine, Genotyping, Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B, Strain coverage, gMATS,
- MeSH
- antigeny bakteriální genetika MeSH
- celosvětové zdraví MeSH
- genotyp * MeSH
- genotypizační techniky metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- meningokoková meningitida epidemiologie mikrobiologie MeSH
- meningokokové vakcíny imunologie MeSH
- molekulární epidemiologie metody MeSH
- Neisseria meningitidis séroskupiny B klasifikace genetika izolace a purifikace MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- 4CMenB vaccine MeSH Prohlížeč
- antigeny bakteriální MeSH
- meningokokové vakcíny MeSH
BACKGROUND: The Meningococcal Antigen Typing System (MATS) was developed to identify meningococcus group B strains with a high likelihood of being covered by the 4CMenB vaccine, but is limited by the requirement for viable isolates from culture-confirmed cases. We examined if antigen genotyping could complement MATS in predicting strain coverage by the 4CMenB vaccine. METHODS: From a panel of 3912 MATS-typed invasive meningococcal disease isolates collected in England and Wales in 2007-2008, 2014-2015 and 2015-2016, and in 16 other countries in 2000-2015, 3481 isolates were also characterized by antigen genotyping. Individual associations between antigen genotypes and MATS coverage for each 4CMenB component were used to define a genetic MATS (gMATS). gMATS estimates were compared with England and Wales human complement serum bactericidal assay (hSBA) data and vaccine effectiveness (VE) data from England. RESULTS: Overall, 81% of the strain panel had genetically predictable MATS coverage, with 92% accuracy and highly concordant results across national panels (Lin's accuracy coefficient, 0.98; root-mean-square deviation, 6%). England and Wales strain coverage estimates were 72-73% by genotyping (66-73% by MATS), underestimating hSBA values after four vaccine doses (88%) and VE after two doses (83%). The gMATS predicted strain coverage in other countries was 58-88%. CONCLUSIONS: gMATS can replace MATS in predicting 4CMenB strain coverage in four out of five cases, without requiring a cultivable isolate, and is open to further improvement. Both methods underestimated VE in England. Strain coverage predictions in other countries matched or exceeded England and Wales estimates.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta GA USA
Instituto Adolfo Lutz São Paulo Brazil
Irish Meningitis and Sepsis Reference Laboratory Dublin Ireland
Meningococcal Reference Unit Public Health England Manchester Royal Infirmary Manchester UK
National Centre for Microbiology Institute of Health Carlos 3 Madrid Spain
National Institute for Health and Welfare Helsinki Finland
National Institute of Health Dr Ricardo Jorge Lisbon Portugal
National Institute of Public Health Prague Czech Republic
National Medicines Institute Warsaw Poland
National Meningitis Reference Laboratory National School of Public Health Athens Greece
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org