This study examined the role of advance expectations in generating relevance-based selection, using a version of cognitive "blindness" that is driven solely by task relevance. With this irrelevance-induced blindness, participants often fail to report a feature of an irrelevant stimulus, even though the levels of perceptual and cognitive load are minimal (i.e., capacity limitations are not met). Hence, with this phenomenon, selection is based solely on task relevance. In two experiments, we examined such relevance-based selection with a new paradigm in which the participants had to report the location of an object appearing on one of two rings. Critically, while in Experiment 1 the participants could form advance expectations regarding the (ir) relevant stimuli, because the location of the relevant ring and the shape and color of the relevant object were known in advance, in Experiment 2 no concrete advance expectations could be formed. This was established by varying randomly, from trial to trial, the shape, color, and location of relevant and irrelevant stimuli. We found strong irrelevance-induced blindness in both experiments, regardless of whether or not advance expectations were formed. These findings suggest that advance expectations, at least with regard to the task-relevant stimulus' location shape or color, are not necessary for irrelevance-induced blindness to occur; more generally, this implies that such expectations do not play a critical role in selection processes that are based solely on task relevance. We further discuss these findings in the context of Garnerian and Posnerian selection, and their relationship to visual awareness.

Department of Psychology University of Haifa 31905 Haifa Israel

Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Vision Res. 1999 Jan;39(2):293-306 PubMed

Perception. 1999;28(9):1059-74 PubMed

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Jun;26(3):997-1017 PubMed

Psychol Sci. 2001 Jan;12(1):9-17 PubMed

Psychol Sci. 2002 Mar;13(2):119-24 PubMed

Vision Res. 2003 Mar;43(6):629-37 PubMed

Cogn Psychol. 1992 Oct;24(4):502-34 PubMed

Exp Psychol. 2007;54(1):44-53 PubMed

Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2010 Oct 1;4(10):951-967 PubMed

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun;39(3):611-5 PubMed

Psychol Sci. 2015 Feb;26(2):203-10 PubMed

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:125-37 PubMed

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 19;373(1755): PubMed

Mem Cognit. 2019 May;47(4):696-705 PubMed

J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984 Dec;113(4):501-17 PubMed

Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25 PubMed

Percept Psychophys. 1980 Sep;28(3):241-8 PubMed

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):451-68 PubMed

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Feb;23(1):51-71 PubMed

Percept Psychophys. 1998 Jul;60(5):727-46 PubMed