Diagnosis and outcome of acute respiratory failure in immunocompromised patients after bronchoscopy
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic-print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, pozorovací studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
31109985
DOI
10.1183/13993003.02442-2018
PII: 13993003.02442-2018
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bronchoskopie škodlivé účinky přístrojové vybavení MeSH
- hematologické nádory diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- hostitel s imunodeficiencí * MeSH
- jednotky intenzivní péče statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- logistické modely MeSH
- mortalita v nemocnicích MeSH
- neinvazivní ventilace metody MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- respirační insuficience diagnóza patofyziologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
OBJECTIVE: We wished to explore the use, diagnostic capability and outcomes of bronchoscopy added to noninvasive testing in immunocompromised patients. In this setting, an inability to identify the cause of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure is associated with worse outcome. Every effort should be made to obtain a diagnosis, either with noninvasive testing alone or combined with bronchoscopy. However, our understanding of the risks and benefits of bronchoscopy remains uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a pre-planned secondary analysis of Efraim, a prospective, multinational, observational study of 1611 immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). We compared patients with noninvasive testing only to those who had also received bronchoscopy by bivariate analysis and after propensity score matching. RESULTS: Bronchoscopy was performed in 618 (39%) patients who were more likely to have haematological malignancy and a higher severity of illness score. Bronchoscopy alone achieved a diagnosis in 165 patients (27% adjusted diagnostic yield). Bronchoscopy resulted in a management change in 236 patients (38% therapeutic yield). Bronchoscopy was associated with worsening of respiratory status in 69 (11%) patients. Bronchoscopy was associated with higher ICU (40% versus 28%; p<0.0001) and hospital mortality (49% versus 41%; p=0.003). The overall rate of undiagnosed causes was 13%. After propensity score matching, bronchoscopy remained associated with increased risk of hospital mortality (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.08-1.81). CONCLUSIONS: Bronchoscopy was associated with improved diagnosis and changes in management, but also increased hospital mortality. Balancing risk and benefit in individualised cases should be investigated further.
CIBERES Instituto Salud Carlos 3 and Vall d'Hebron Institut of Research Barcelona Barcelona Spain
Dept of Anesthesiology 1 Herlev University Hospital Herlev Denmark
Dept of Anesthesiology Herlev University Hospital UCPH Herlev Denmark
Dept of Clinical Pharmacology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Dept of Critical Care Hospital Son Llatzer Palma de Mallorca Spain
Dept of Critical Care King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Dept of Critical Care Mater Misericordiae Dublin Ireland
Dept of Critical Care University Hospital Lyon Sud Pierre Benite France
Dept of Emergencies and Critical Care Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet Oslo Norway
Dept of Intensive Care Amsterdam UMC VU Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
Dept of Intensive Care Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge Barcelona Spain
Dept of Intensive Care Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht The Netherlands
Dept of Intensive Care Medicine Lapeyronie University Hospital Montpellier France
Dept of Intensive Care Medicine Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
Dept of Intensive Care Medicine St Olav's University Hospital Trondheim Norway
Dept of Intensive Care Medicine Universidad de Barcelona IDIBAPS Barcelona Spain
Dept of Intensive Care Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Penn State University College of Medicine Hershey PA USA
Medical Intensive Care Unit CHG Victor Provo Roubaix France
Réanimation Médicale CHU de Caen Caen France
Service de Pneumologie et Réanimation CHU Pitié Salpétrière Paris France
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org