The Czech Republic holds one of the highest numbers of men labelled as sexual delinquents worldwide who have undergone the irreversible process of surgical castration - a policy that has elicited strong international criticism. Nevertheless, Czech sexology has not changed its attitude towards 'therapeutic castration', which remains widely accepted and practised. In this paper, we analyse the negotiation of expertise supporting castration and demonstrate how the changes in institutional matrices and networks of experts (Eyal 2013) have impacted the categorisation of patients and the methods of treatment. Our research shows the great importance of historical development that tied Czech sexology with the state. Indeed, Czech sexology has been profoundly institutionalised since the early 1970s. In accordance with the state politics of that era, officially named Normalisation, sexology focused on sexual deviants and began creating a treatment programme that included therapeutic castration. This practice, the aim of which is to protect society from sex offenders, has changed little since. We argue that it is the expert-state alliance that enables Czech sexologists to preserve the status quo in the treatment of sexual delinquents despite international pressure. Our research underscores the continuity in medical practice despite the regime change in 1989. With regard to previous scholarship on state-socialist Czechoslovakia, we argue that it was the medical mainstream that developed and sustained disciplining and punitive features.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Cesk Psychiatr. 1959 Aug;55:264-9 PubMed

Sb Lek. 2000;101(2):173-84 PubMed

Cesk Psychiatr. 1988 Jun;84(3):173-80 PubMed

Cesk Psychiatr. 1970 Jun;66(3):191-2 PubMed

Prakt Lek. 1953 Jul 20;33(14):316-8 PubMed

Cesk Psychiatr. 1967 Oct;63(5):350-4 PubMed

J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2018 Jan 1;73(1):73-95 PubMed

Cas Lek Cesk. 1977 Jul 29;116(29-30):917 PubMed

Med Hist. 2016 Oct;60(4):534-56 PubMed

Cesk Psychiatr. 1977 Feb;73(1):39-45 PubMed

Soc Stud Sci. 2015 Apr;45(2):187-213 PubMed

Cas Lek Cesk. 1965 May 21;104:529-30 PubMed

Cas Lek Cesk. 1970 Jun 19;109(26):585 PubMed

Cesk Gynekol. 1966 Oct;31(8):561-2 PubMed

Cesk Psychiatr. 1970 Jun;66(3):152-7 PubMed

Cesk Psychiatr. 1964 Aug;60:234-9 PubMed

Cas Lek Cesk. 1977 Jul 29;116(29-30):919 PubMed

Cas Lek Cesk. 1985 May 17;124(20):622-5 PubMed

Cesk Psychiatr. 1984 Oct;80(5):298-302 PubMed

Cesk Psychiatr. 1972 Oct;68(5):308-11 PubMed

Cas Lek Cesk. 1977 Jul 29;116(29-30):912-4 PubMed