Transmission and loss of ECG snapshots: Remote monitoring in implantable cardiac monitors
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
31233982
DOI
10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.06.005
PII: S0022-0736(19)30322-X
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Arrhythmia detection, Implantable cardiac monitor, Remote management, Telemedicine, Transmission success,
- MeSH
- bradykardie MeSH
- defibrilátory implantabilní * MeSH
- elektrokardiografie ambulantní MeSH
- elektrokardiografie MeSH
- fibrilace síní * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Remote monitoring including transmission of electrocardiogram (ECG) strips has been implemented in implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). We appraise whether the physician can rely on remote monitoring to be informed of all possibly significant arrhythmias. METHODS: We analyzed remote monitoring transmissions of patients in the ongoing BIO|GUARD-MI study, in which Biotronik devices are used. Once per day, the devices automatically transmit messages with up to six ECG snapshots to the Home Monitoring Service Center. If more than one type of arrhythmia is recorded during a day, at least one ECG of each arrhythmia type is transmitted. RESULTS: 212 study patients were registered at the service center. The mean age of the patients was 70 ± 8 years, and 74% were male. Patients were followed for an average of 13 months. The median time from device implantation until the first message receipt in the service center was 2 days. The median patient-individual transmission success was 98.0% (IQR 93.6-99.8) and remained stable in the second and third year. The most frequent arrhythmias were atrial fibrillation, bradycardia and high ventricular rate. 17.3% of the messages with ECG snapshots contained more than one arrhythmia type. DISCUSSION: Our analysis confirms that the physician can rely on Home Monitoring to be informed of all possibly significant arrhythmias during long-term follow-up. We have found hints that the transmission of only one episode per day may lead to the loss of clinically relevant information if patients with ICMs are followed by remote monitoring only.
Aalborg University Hospital Cardiology Hobrovej 18 22 9100 Aalborg Denmark
Biotronik SE and Co KG Woermannkehre 1 12359 Berlin Germany
Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc Cardiology 1 P Pavlova 6 77900 Olomouc Czech Republic
Herning Hospital Gl Landevej 61 7400 Herning Denmark
Klinikum Coburg Cardiology Ketschendorfer Straße 33 96450 Coburg Germany
National Hospital of Cardiology Gyogy ter 2 8231 Balatonfüred Hungary
Regionshospitalet Viborg Cardiology Heibergs Alle 2 8800 Viborg Denmark
Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Cardiology Blegdamsvej 9 2100 Copenhagen Denmark
University of Pecs Heart Institute Ifjúság street 13 7624 Pecs Hungary
Vivantes Humboldt Klinikum Cardiology Am Nordgraben 2 13509 Berlin Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Arrhythmia monitoring and outcome after myocardial infarction (BIO|GUARD-MI): a randomized trial