GPs' perspectives on eHealth use in the Czech Republic: a cross-sectional mixed-design survey study
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic-print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
31344683
PubMed Central
PMC6970584
DOI
10.3399/bjgpopen19x101655
PII: bjgpopen19X101655
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- ICT, clinicians, eHealth, general practice, mHealth, telemedicine,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Digitalisation of health services is among the top priorities of the European Union (EU), yet take-up of eHealth tools is slower in some EU countries than others. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of information communication technology (ICT) and eHealth tools by Czech GPs, to elucidate their motivation and barriers to the adoption of eHealth technologies. DESIGN & SETTING: A cross-sectional, mixed-design survey study, administered online and conducted with GPs from seven randomly selected Czech regions. Of the invited 777 GPs, 196 participants responded (25% response rate) and 153 completed the survey. METHOD: Quantitative (measured using, for example, the eHealth readiness scale) and qualitative (thematic analysis) methods were used. RESULTS: Hierarchical multilinear regression (controling for age, sex, and city size) showed that ICT usage in general practice was predicted by eHealth readiness. Among GPs with their own practice, age and practice size also predicted ICT use. Analysis of barriers specific to mobile health tools identified obstacles on the side of GPs (such as low perceived usefulness), patients (such as lack of interest), and contextual barriers (such as lack of time). CONCLUSION: In addition to system-level change, educating Czech GPs about the benefits of eHealth tools for better patient-provider interaction and quality of care is necessary to facilitate eHealth adoption and usage in the Czech Republic.
Academic Researcher Faculty of Social Studies Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
PhD Student Faculty of Education University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
PhD Student Faculty of Informatics Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
PhD Student Faculty of Social Studies Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
O'Connor S, Hanlon P, O'Donnell CA, et al. Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016;16(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0359-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Pagliari C, Sloan D, Gregor P, et al. What is eHealth (4): a scoping exercise to map the field. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e9. PubMed DOI PMC
Codagnone C, Lupiañez-Villanueva F, European Commission, Directorate-General of Communications Networks [Content & Technology] Benchmarking deployment of eHealth among general practitioners — final report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2013. [Jul 17;2019 ].
De Rosis S, Seghieri C. Basic ICT adoption and use by general practitioners: an analysis of primary care systems in 31 European countries. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015;15(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0185-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Sauermann S, Forjan M, Herzog J. eHealth strategies — scientific review. http://healthy-interoperability.at/fileadmin/downloads/D_eHealthresearchreporteHealthresearchreport_201605_V01.00.pdf. [Jul 18;2019 ];2016
Union Européenne des Médecins Omnipracticiens/Médecins de Famille (UEMO) Health by numbers – big data and healthcare in Europe. http://www.uemo.eu/2017/06/06/health-by-numbers-big-data-and-healthcare-in-europe/ [Jul 17;2019 ];2017
Currie WL, Seddon JJM. A cross-national analysis of eHealth in the European Union: some policy and research directions. Information & Management. 2014;51(6):783–797. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.04.004. DOI
European Commission, Information Society and Media Directorate General Benchmarking ICT use among GPs in Europe. Country profiles. http://ehealth-indicators.eu/country-profiles.html. [Jul 17;2019 ];2007
WONCA Europe WONCA Europe: Barcelona; 2002. [Jul 17;2019 ]. The European definition of general practice/family medicine.
Meyer I, Hüsing T, Dobrev A, et al. Availability and usage of ICT applications among European primary care physicians. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;143:142. PubMed
Yusif S, Hafeez-Baig A, Soar J. E-Health readiness assessment factors and measuring tools: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2017;107:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.08.006. PubMed DOI
Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.
Atherton H, Brant H, Ziebland S, et al. Alternatives to the face-to-face consultation in general practice: focused ethnographic case study. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(669):e293–e300. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X694853. PubMed DOI PMC
Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C, et al. Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(7):836–848. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.05.007. PubMed DOI
Harris DA, Haskell J, Cooper E, et al. Estimating the association between burnout and electronic health record-related stress among advanced practice registered nurses. Appl Nurs Res. 2018;43:36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.06.014. PubMed DOI
Praktický lékař [Well-known physician] Známý Lékař (in Czech) www.znamylekar.cz/prakticky-lekar. [Jul 17;2019 ];2018
Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic [Health care in the Czech Republic: a brief overview of the activities of the general practitioner for adults 2007–2015] Zdravotnictví ČR: Stručný přehled činnosti oboru praktický lékař pro dospělé 2007–2015 (in Czech) https://www.uzis.cz/publikace/zdravotnictvi-cr-strucny-prehled-cinnosti-oboru-prakticky-lekar-pro-dospele-2007-2015. [Jul 17;2019 ];2015
Bhalla A, Durham RL, Al-Tabaa N, et al. The development and initial psychometric validation of the eHealth readiness scale. Computers in Human Behaviour. 2016;65(1):460–467. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.015. DOI
Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687. PubMed DOI
Steps Forward, AMA Mini Z burnout survey. https://edhub.ama-assn.org/steps-forward/module/2702509?resultClick=3&bypassSolrId=J_2702509#resource. [Jul 18;2019 ];2015
Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1(3):185–216. doi: 10.1177/135910457000100301. DOI
Jones PS, Lee JW, Phillips LR, et al. An adaptation of Brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research. Nurs Res. 2001;50(5):300–304. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200109000-00008. PubMed DOI
Saleh S, Khodor R, Alameddine M, et al. Readiness of healthcare providers for eHealth: the case from primary healthcare centers in Lebanon. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1896-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Qureshi QA, Qureshi NA, Chishti KA, et al. E-Readiness: a critical factor for successful implementation of Ehealth projects in developing countries like Pakistan. Gomal University Journal of Research. 2014;30(2):77–86.
Biruk S, Yilma T, Andualem M, et al. Health professionals' readiness to implement electronic medical record system at three hospitals in Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014;14(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0115-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Brooks RG, Menachemi N. Physicians' use of email with patients: factors influencing electronic communication and adherence to best practices. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.1.e2. PubMed DOI PMC
Torrent-Sellens J, Díaz-Chao Á, Soler-Ramos I, Saigí-Rubió F. Modeling and predicting outcomes of eHealth usage by European physicians: multidimensional approach from a survey of 9196 general practitioners. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(10):e279.:e279. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9253. PubMed DOI PMC
Price M, Gros DF, McCauley JL, et al. Nonuse and dropout attrition for a web-based mental health intervention delivered in a post-disaster context. Psychiatry. 2012;75(3):267–284. doi: 10.1521/psyc.2012.75.3.267. PubMed DOI PMC
Decker SL, Jamoom EW, Sisk JE. Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31(5):1108–1114. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1121. PubMed DOI
MacGregor R, Hyland P, Harvei C, et al. Benefits of ICT adoption and use in regional general medical practices: a pilot study. Health Inf Manag. 2006;35(3):23–35. doi: 10.1177/183335830603500306. PubMed DOI
Garritty C, El Emam K. Who's using PDAs? Estimates of PDA use by health care providers: a systematic review of surveys. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e7. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e7. PubMed DOI PMC
Osmani V, Forti S, Mayora O. Enabling prescription-based health apps. 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare — PervasiveHealth '17; Barcelona, Spain. 23rd–26th May 2017.
Lupač P, Chrobáková A, Sládek J. The internet in the Czech Republic 2014. World Internet Project. Prague: Charles University; 2014. [Jul 18;2019 ].
Selwyn N. The information aged: a qualitative study of older adults' use of information and communications technology. J Aging Stud. 2004;18(4):369–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2004.06.008. DOI
Konschak C, Nayyar G, Morris WH, et al. MHealth. Global opportunities and challenges. Virginia Beach, VA: Convurgent Publishing; 2013.
Cunningham CT, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, et al. Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0016-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Nulty DD. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assess Eval High Educ. 2008;33(3):301–314. doi: 10.1080/02602930701293231. DOI
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic The National eHealth strategy of the Czech Republic [version 0.2_EN] Prague: Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic; 2016.
Hennemann S, Beutel ME, Zwerenz R. Ready for eHealth? Health professionals' acceptance and adoption of eHealth interventions in inpatient routine care. J Health Commun. 2017;22(3):274–284. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1284286. PubMed DOI