Oral Contraceptive Use and Breast Cancer Risk: Retrospective and Prospective Analyses From a BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carrier Cohort Study
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country England, Great Britain Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
10118
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
11174
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
20861
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
23382
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
PubMed
31360853
PubMed Central
PMC6649757
DOI
10.1093/jncics/pky023
PII: pky023
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: For BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, the association between oral contraceptive preparation (OCP) use and breast cancer (BC) risk is still unclear. METHODS: Breast camcer risk associations were estimated from OCP data on 6030 BRCA1 and 3809 BRCA2 mutation carriers using age-dependent Cox regression, stratified by study and birth cohort. Prospective, left-truncated retrospective and full-cohort retrospective analyses were performed. RESULTS: For BRCA1 mutation carriers, OCP use was not associated with BC risk in prospective analyses (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75 to 1.56), but in the left-truncated and full-cohort retrospective analyses, risks were increased by 26% (95% CI = 6% to 51%) and 39% (95% CI = 23% to 58%), respectively. For BRCA2 mutation carriers, OCP use was associated with BC risk in prospective analyses (HR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.97), but retrospective analyses were inconsistent (left-truncated: HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.33; full cohort: HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.28 to 1.81). There was evidence of increasing risk with duration of use, especially before the first full-term pregnancy (BRCA1: both retrospective analyses, P < .001 and P = .001, respectively; BRCA2: full retrospective analysis, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective analyses did not show that past use of OCP is associated with an increased BC risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers in young middle-aged women (40-50 years). For BRCA2 mutation carriers, a causal association is also not likely at those ages. Findings between retrospective and prospective analyses were inconsistent and could be due to survival bias or a true association for younger women who were underrepresented in the prospective cohort. Given the uncertain safety of long-term OCP use for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, indications other than contraception should be avoided and nonhormonal contraceptive methods should be discussed.
Cancer Epidemiology Centre Cancer Council Victoria Victoria Australia
Centre François Baclesse Caen France
CHU de Grenoble Hôpital Couple Enfant Département de Génétique Grenoble France
Clinical Genetics Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Department of Clincial Genetics Rigshospitalet København Denmark
Department of Clinical Genetics Academic Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands
Department of Clinical Genetics Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands
Department of Clinical Genetics South Glasgow University Hospitals Glasgow UK
Department of Dermatology University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT
Department of Epidemiology Cancer Prevention Institute of California Fremont CA
Department of Epidemiology Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam the Netherlands
Department of Genetics and Pathology Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin Poland
Department of Medical Oncology Prince of Wales Hospital Randwick Australia
Department of Medical Oncology St Vincent's Hospital Fitzroy Australia
Department of Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute Salt Lake City UT
Department of Medicine St Vincent's Hospital University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia
Department of Molecular Genetics National Institute of Oncology Budapest Hungary
Department of OB GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Oncology Lund University Hospital
Department of Pediatrics and Medicine Columbia University New York NY
Division of Population Science Fox Chase Cancer Center Philadelphia PA
Ecole des Mines de Paris ParisTech Fontainebleau France
Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory Department of Pathology
Hôpital Universitaire Dupuytren Service d'Oncologie Médicale Limoges France
Human Genetics Group Spanish National Cancer Centre Madrid Spain
Institute for Medical Informatics Statistics and Epidemiology University of Leipzig Germany
Lund University Lund Sweden; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology
Medical Faculty University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne Germany
Oncogenetics Team The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust Sutton UK
Oncology and Pathology Department of Clinical Sciences Lund
Oxford Regional Genetics Service Churchill Hospital Oxford UK
Precision Medicine School of Clinical Science at Monash Health Monash University Victoria Australia
Prince of Wales Clinical School University of New South Wales Sydney Australia
Service de Génétique Oncologique Hôpital René Huguenin Institut Curie Saint Cloud France
South East of Scotland Regional Genetics Service Western General Hospital Edinburgh UK
Stanford Cancer Institute Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 Villeurbanne France
Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service Chapel Allerton Hospital Leeds UK
See more in PubMed
Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR et al. , . Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA. 2017;31723:2402–2416. PubMed
Cibula D, Gompel A, Mueck AO et al. , . Hormonal contraception and risk of cancer. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;166:631–650. PubMed
Davidson BA, Moorman PG.. Risk-benefit assessment of the combined oral contraceptive pill in women with a family history of female cancer. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;1310:1375–1382. PubMed
Gadducci A, Sergiampietri C, Tana R.. Alternatives to risk-reducing surgery for ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(Suppl 8):viii47–viii53. PubMed
Lee E, Ma H, McKean-Cowdin R et al. , . Effect of reproductive factors and oral contraceptives on breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and noncarriers: Results from a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;1711:3170–3178. PubMed
Narod SA, Dube MP, Klijn J et al. , . Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;9423:1773–1779. PubMed
Walker JL, Powell CB, Chen LM et al. , . Society of Gynecologic Oncology recommendations for the prevention of ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2015;12113:2108–2120. PubMed
Goldgar D, Bonnardel C, Renard H et al. , . The International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study: Purpose, rationale, and study design. Breast Cancer Res. 2000;E10.
John EM, Hopper JL, Beck JC et al. , . The Breast Cancer Family Registry: An infrastructure for cooperative multinational, interdisciplinary and translational studies of the genetic epidemiology of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;64:R375–R389. PubMed PMC
Phillips KA, Butow PN, Stewart AE et al. , . Predictors of participation in clinical and psychosocial follow-up of the kConFab breast cancer family cohort. Fam Cancer. 2005;42:105–113. PubMed
Thorne H, Mitchell G, Fox S et al. , . kConFab: A familial breast cancer consortium facilitating research and translational oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2011;201143:79–81. PubMed
Antoniou AC, Goldgar DE, Andrieu N et al. , . A weighted cohort approach for analysing factors modifying disease risks in carriers of high-risk susceptibility genes. Genet Epidemiol. 2005;291:1–11. PubMed
Bernholtz S, Laitman Y, Kaufman B et al. , . Cancer risk in Jewish BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: Effects of oral contraceptive use and parental origin of mutation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;1292:557–563. PubMed
Brohet RM, Goldgar DE, Easton DF et al. , . Oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk in the international BRCA1/2 carrier cohort study: A report from EMBRACE, GENEPSO, GEO-HEBON, and the IBCCS Collaborating Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;2525:3831–3836. PubMed
Gronwald J, Byrski T, Huzarski T et al. , . Influence of selected lifestyle factors on breast and ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers from Poland. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;952:105–109. PubMed
Haile RW, Thomas DC, McGuire V et al. , . BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, oral contraceptive use, and breast cancer before age 50. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;1510:1863–1870. PubMed
Kotsopoulos J, Lubinski J, Moller P et al. , . Timing of oral contraceptive use and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;1433:579–586. PubMed
Ursin G, Henderson BE, Haile RW et al. , . Does oral contraceptive use increase the risk of breast cancer in women with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations more than in other women? Cancer Res. 1997;5717:3678–3681. PubMed
Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: Collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Lancet. 1996;3479017:1713–1727. PubMed
Pike MC, Henderson BE, Casagrande JT et al. , . Oral contraceptive use and early abortion as risk factors for breast cancer in young women. Br J Cancer. 1981;431:72–76. PubMed PMC
Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA, Seynaeve C, van Asperen CJ et al. , . Breast cancer risk after salpingo-oophorectomy in healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: Revisiting the evidence for risk reduction. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;1075:djv033. PubMed
Kim J, Oktay K.. Baseline E(2) levels are higher in BRCA2 mutation carriers: A potential target for prevention? Cancer Causes Control. 2013;243:421–426. PubMed PMC
King MC, Wieand S, Hale K et al. , . Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP-P1) Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. JAMA. 2001;28618:2251–2256. PubMed
Mavaddat N, Barrowdale D, Andrulis IL et al. , . Pathology of breast and ovarian cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: Results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;211:134–147. PubMed PMC
Moorman PG, Havrilesky LJ, Gierisch JM et al. , . Oral contraceptives and risk of ovarian cancer and breast cancer among high-risk women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2013;3133:4188–4198. PubMed
Garcia C, Wendt J, Lyon L et al. , . Risk management options elected by women after testing positive for a BRCA mutation. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;1322:428–433. PubMed
Mannis GN, Fehniger JE, Creasman JS et al. , . Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening in 1077 women after BRCA testing. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;1732:96–103. PubMed PMC
van Driel CM, Eltahir Y, de Vries J et al. , . Risk-reducing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: Factors influencing uptake and timing. Maturitas. 2014;772:180–184. PubMed