-
Something wrong with this record ?
Alterations in DNA Damage Repair Genes Before and After Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
U. Lemberger, B. Ernhofer, S. Krieger, A. Bruchbacher, A. Oszwald, E. Laukhtina, A. Haitl, MR. Hassler, B. Englinger, E. Compérat, SF. Shariat
Status not-indexed Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2020
PubMed Central
from 2020
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2020
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The role of genetic variants in response to systemic therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is still elusive. We assessed variations in genes involved in DNA damage repair (DDR) before and after cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and correlation of alteration patterns with DNA damage and response to therapy. METHODS: Matched tissue from 46 patients with MIBC was investigated via Ion Torrent-based next-generation sequencing using a self-designed panel of 30 DDR genes. Phosphorylation of γ-histone 2A.X (H2AX) was analyzed via immunohistochemistry to evaluate DNA damage. Genetic variants were analyzed along with clinical data and quantitative phospho-H2AX data using the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression analysis, and factor analysis of mixed data. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Twenty-five patients (54%) had a response (
Center for Cancer Research Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Clinical Institute of Pathology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25001879
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250123101956.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250117e20241205ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.022 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39717660
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Lemberger, Ursula $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 245 10
- $a Alterations in DNA Damage Repair Genes Before and After Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer / $c U. Lemberger, B. Ernhofer, S. Krieger, A. Bruchbacher, A. Oszwald, E. Laukhtina, A. Haitl, MR. Hassler, B. Englinger, E. Compérat, SF. Shariat
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The role of genetic variants in response to systemic therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is still elusive. We assessed variations in genes involved in DNA damage repair (DDR) before and after cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and correlation of alteration patterns with DNA damage and response to therapy. METHODS: Matched tissue from 46 patients with MIBC was investigated via Ion Torrent-based next-generation sequencing using a self-designed panel of 30 DDR genes. Phosphorylation of γ-histone 2A.X (H2AX) was analyzed via immunohistochemistry to evaluate DNA damage. Genetic variants were analyzed along with clinical data and quantitative phospho-H2AX data using the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression analysis, and factor analysis of mixed data. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Twenty-five patients (54%) had a response (<pT2 pN0 cM0) to NAC. Responders had more somatic DDR gene variants in preNAC (53 vs 11; p < 0.001) and postNAC (51 vs 9; p = 0.038) tumor tissue in comparison to nonresponders, as well as significantly greater phosphorylation of H2AX after NAC. ERCC2 was significantly co-mutated with REV3L among responders. Owing to the small cohort, no specific mutation was significantly positively associated with therapy response. However, accumulation of CDK12, NBN, MSH3, MLH1, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, REVL3L, and SLX4 variants was observed for responders. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients with MIBC who responded to cisplatin-based NAC had more somatic DDR gene variants than nonresponders. Moreover, responders exhibited significantly greater DNA damage after NAC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who have mutations in genes that are involved in repair of DNA damage are more likely to respond to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Testing to identify these gene mutations could help in selecting the patients who are most likely to benefit from this treatment.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Ernhofer, Büsra $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Krieger, Sigurd $u Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Bruchbacher, Andreas $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Oszwald, André $u Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Laukhtina, Ekaterina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Haitl, Andrea $u Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Hassler, Melanie R $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Englinger, Bernhard $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Center for Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Compérat, Eva $u Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia $u Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- 773 0_
- $w MED00207999 $t European urology open science $x 2666-1683 $g Roč. 71 (20241205), s. 38-48
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39717660 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250117 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250123101950 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2254413 $s 1237882
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 71 $c - $d 38-48 $e 20241205 $i 2666-1683 $m European urology open science $n Eur Urol Open Sci $x MED00207999
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250117