Use of mild cognitive impairment and prodromal AD/MCI due to AD in clinical care: a European survey
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
MC_PC_13088
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
115372
Innovative Medicines Initiative - International
PubMed
31439020
PubMed Central
PMC6706888
DOI
10.1186/s13195-019-0525-9
PII: 10.1186/s13195-019-0525-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- MCI, MCI due to AD, Prodromal AD, Questionnaire, Survey,
- MeSH
- Alzheimerova nemoc diagnóza MeSH
- kognitivní dysfunkce diagnóza MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- neurologie MeSH
- postoj zdravotnického personálu * MeSH
- prodromální symptomy MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) refers to cognitive impairment not meeting dementia criteria. A survey among members of the American Association of Neurology (AAN) showed that MCI was considered a useful diagnosis. Recently, research criteria have been proposed for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in MCI based on AD biomarkers (prodromal AD/MCI due to AD). The aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes of clinicians in Europe on the clinical utility of MCI and prodromal AD/MCI due to AD criteria. We also investigated whether the prodromal AD/MCI due to AD criteria impacted management of MCI patients. METHODS: An online survey was performed in 2015 among 102 members of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC). Questions were asked on how often criteria were used, how they were operationalized, how they changed patient management, and what were considered advantages and limitations of MCI and prodromal AD/MCI due to AD. The questionnaire consisted of 47 questions scored on a Likert scale. RESULTS: Almost all respondents (92%) used the MCI diagnosis in clinical practice. Over 80% of the EAN/EADC respondents found a MCI diagnosis useful because it helped to label the cognitive problem, involve patients in planning for the future, and start risk reduction activities. These findings were similar to those reported in the AAN survey. Research criteria for prodromal AD/MCI due to AD were used by 68% of the EAN/EADC respondents. The most common reasons to use the criteria were increased certainty of diagnosis (86%), increased possibilities to provide counseling (51%), facilitation of follow-up planning (48%), start of medical intervention (49%), and response to patients' wish for a diagnosis (41%). Over 70% of the physicians considered that a diagnosis of prodromal AD/MCI due to AD had an added value over the MCI diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic criteria of MCI and prodromal AD/MCI due to AD are commonly used among EAN/EADC members. The prodromal AD/MCI due to AD were considered clinically useful and impacted patient management and communication.
BarcelonaBeta Brain Research Center Pasqual Maragall Foundation Barcelona Spain
Clinical Neurology Unit Department of Neuroscience University of Genoa Genoa Italy
Department of Psychiatry University of Zurich Zürich Switzerland
Learning and Research Faculty of Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK
Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging Rochester MN USA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Gauthier S, Reisberg B, Zaudig M, et al. Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet. 2006;367(9518):1262–1270. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68542-5. PubMed DOI
Ganguli M, Dodge HH, Shen C, DeKosky ST. Mild cognitive impairment, amnestic type: an epidemiologic study. Neurology. 2004;63(1):115–121. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000132523.27540.81. PubMed DOI
Visser PJ. Mild cognitive impairment subtypes and vascular dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(12):1966–1967. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00976.x. PubMed DOI
Petersen RC, Caracciolo B, Brayne C, Gauthier S, Jelic V, Fratiglioni L. Mild cognitive impairment: a concept in evolution. J Intern Med. 2014;275(3):214–228. doi: 10.1111/joim.12190. PubMed DOI PMC
Roberts JS, Karlawish JH, Uhlmann WR, Petersen RC, Green RC. Mild cognitive impairment in clinical care: a survey of American Academy of Neurology members. Neurol Int. 2010;75(5):425–431. PubMed PMC
Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008. PubMed DOI PMC
Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al. Position paper advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease: the IWG-2 criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:614–629. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0. PubMed DOI
Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al. Revising the definition of Alzheimer’s disease: a new lexicon. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(11):1118–1127. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70223-4. PubMed DOI
Bocchetta M, Galluzzi S, Kehoe PG, et al. The use of biomarkers for the etiologic diagnosis of MCI in Europe: an EADC survey. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(2):195–206.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.06.006. PubMed DOI
Hort J, O’Brien JT, Gainotti G, et al. EFNS guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(10):1236–1248. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03040.x. PubMed DOI
Van Rossum IA, Visser PJ, Knol DL, et al. Injury markers but not amyloid markers are associated with rapid progression from mild cognitive impairment to dementia in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;29(2):319–327. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-111694. PubMed DOI
Miller AM, Balasa M, Blennow K, et al. Current approaches and clinician attitudes to the use of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in diagnostic evaluation of dementia in Europe. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(1):201–210. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170502. PubMed DOI
Duits FH, Prins ND, Lemstra AW, et al. Diagnostic impact of CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease in a tertiary memory clinic. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(5):523–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.1753. PubMed DOI
Rabinovici GD, Gatsonis C, Apgar C, et al. Association of amyloid positron emission tomography with subsequent change in clinical management among Medicare beneficiaries with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. JAMA. 2019;321(13):1286–94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2000. PubMed DOI PMC
Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14:535–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018. PubMed DOI PMC
Visser PJ, Wolf H, Frisoni G, Gertz H-J. Disclosure of Alzheimer’s disease biomarker status in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Biomark Med. 2012;6:365–368. doi: 10.2217/bmm.12.58. PubMed DOI