To what extent can the chosen blood pressure measurement technique affect the outcomes of an observational survey?
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, pozorovací studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
31475585
DOI
10.2217/cer-2018-0149
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- EUROASPIRE, auscultatory, automated oscillometric, coronary heart disease, treatment target adherence, unattended automated oscillometric,
- MeSH
- klinické protokoly MeSH
- krevní tlak MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- měření krevního tlaku metody MeSH
- oscilometrie MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Aim: We analyzed to what extent measurement protocol influenced individual blood pressure (BP) and achievement of treatment target in patients with coronary heart disease. Methods: In a subsample of Czech EUROASPIRE III-V survey participants (n = 913), we compared the per-protocol BP measurement (by automated oscillometric device OMRON at the beginning of survey procedure) with control auscultatory measurement (by physician during interview). Results: Per-protocol approach produced significantly (p < 0.0001) higher BP values (by 9/6 mmHg in median) than auscultatory measurements and led to markedly higher proportion of patients over target BP (less than 140/90 mmHg; 59.3 vs 34.9% [p < 0.0001], per-protocol vs auscultatory technique, respectively). Conclusion: Per-protocol oscillometric technique was not equivalent to conventional auscultatory measurement and seriously over-rated the real nonachievement of BP target in observational surveys.
Biomedical Center Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Czech Republic
Department of Cardiology University Hospital Pilsen Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
