Rest Redistribution Functions as a Free and Ad-Hoc Equivalent to Commonly used Velocity-Based Training Thresholds During Clean Pulls at Different Loads
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Poland Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
31531129
PubMed Central
PMC6724594
DOI
10.2478/hukin-2019-0052
PII: hukin-2019-0052
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- cluster sets, fatigue, power, resistance training, traditional sets, weightlifting,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
This study determined whether redistributing total rest time into shorter, but more frequent rest periods could maintain velocity and power output during 3 traditional sets of 6 clean pulls using 80% (TS80), 100% (TS100) and 120% (TS120) of power clean 1RM with 180 seconds of inter-set rest and during 3 "rest redistribution" protocols of 9 sets of 2 clean pulls using 80% (RR80), 100% (RR100) and 120% (RR120) of power clean 1RM with 45 seconds of inter-set rest. The total number of repetitions performed above 10 and 20% velocity loss thresholds, mean and peak velocity maintenance (the average of all 18 repetitions relative to the best repetition; MVM, PVM), and decline (the worst repetition relative to the best repetition; MVD, PVD) were calculated. For MVM, PVM, MVD, and PVD, there were small-to-moderate effect sizes in favour of RR80 and RR100, but large effects favouring RR120, compared to their respective TS protocols. The number of repetitions within a 20% velocity loss threshold was 17.7 ± 0.6 during RR and 16.5 ± 2.4 during TS (effect size 0.69); and the number of repetitions within a 10% velocity loss threshold was about 13.1 ± 3.7 during RR and 10.7 ± 3.6 during TS (effect size 0.66). Therefore, RR generally allowed for a better overall maintenance of velocity and power, especially at heavy loads. Coaches who wish to implement velocity-based training, but who do not wish to purchase or use the associated equipment, may consider rest-redistribution to encourage similar training stimuli.
See more in PubMed
Banyard HG, Nosaka K, Sato K, Haff GG. Validity of various methods for determining velocity, force, and power in the back squat. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12:1170–1176. PubMed
DeWeese BH, Serrano AJ, Scruggs SK, Sams ML. The clean pull and snatch pull: proper technique for weightlifting movement derivatives. Strength Cond J. 2012;34:82–86.
Garhammer J. Power clean: Kinesiological evaluation. Strength Cond J. 1984;6:40.
González-Badillo JJ, Yañez-García JM, Mora-Custodio R, Rodríguez-Rosell D. Velocity loss as a variable for monitoring resistance exercise. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38:217–225. PubMed
Gorostiaga EM, Navarro-Amézqueta I, Calbet JA, Hellsten Y, Cusso R, Guerrero M, Granados C, Gonzalez-Izal M, Ibanez J, Izquierdo M. Energy metabolism during repeated sets of leg press exercise leading to failure or not. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e40621. PubMed PMC
Gorostiaga EM, Navarro-Amézqueta I, Calbet JA, Sánchez-Medina L, Cusso R, Guerrero M, Izquierdo M. Blood ammonia and lactate as markers of muscle metabolites during leg press exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28:2775–2785. PubMed
Hardee JP, Lawrence MM, Utter AC, Triplett NT, Zwetsloot KA, McBride JM. Effect of inter-repetition rest on ratings of perceived exertion during multiple sets of the power clean. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012a;112:3141–3147. PubMed
Hardee JP, Triplett NT, Utter AC, Zwetsloot KA, McBride JM. Effect of interrepetition rest on power output in the power clean. J Strength Cond Res. 2012b;26:883–889. PubMed
Jovanović M, Flanagan EP. Researched applications of velocity based strength training. J Aust Strength Cond. 2014;22:58–69.
Joy J, Oliver J, McCleary S, Lowery R, Wilson J. Power output and electromyography activity of the back squat exercise with cluster sets. J Sports Sci. 2013;1:37–45.
Jukic I, Tufano JJ. Shorter but more frequent rest periods: no effect on velocity and power compared to traditional sets not performed to failure. J Hum Kinet. 2019;66:257–268. PubMed PMC
Mayo X, Iglesias-Soler E, Fernández-Del-Olmo M. Effects of set configuration of resistance exercise on perceived exertion. Percept Mot Skills. 2014;119:825–837. PubMed
Oliver JM, Kreutzer A, Jenke SC, Phillips MD, Mitchell JB, Jones MT. Velocity drives greater power observed during back squat using cluster sets. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30:235–243. PubMed
Orange ST, Metcalfe JW, Marshall P, Vince RV, Madden LA, Liefeith A. Test-retest reliability of a commercial linear position transducer (GymAware PowerTool) to measure velocity and power in the back squat and bench press. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 (Epub ahead of print) PubMed
Padulo J, Mignogna P, Mignardi S, Tonni F, D’Ottavio S. Effect of different pushing speeds on bench press. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33:376–380. PubMed
Pareja-Blanco F, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Sánchez-Medina L, Gorostiaga E, González-Badillo J. Effect of movement velocity during resistance training on neuromuscular performance. Int J Sports Med. 2014;35:916–924. PubMed
Pareja-Blanco F, Sánchez-Medina L, Suárez-Arrones L, González-Badillo JJ. Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on performance in professional soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017a;12:512–519. PubMed
Pareja-Blanco F, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Sánchez-Medina L, Sanchis-Moysi J, Dorado C, Mora-Custodio R, Calbet JA. Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains and muscle adaptations. Scand J Med Sci. 2017b;27:724–735. PubMed
Sanchez-Medina L, González-Badillo JJ. Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1725–1734. PubMed
Suchomel TJ, Comfort P, Lake JP. Enhancing the force-velocity profile of athletes using weightlifting derivatives. Strength Cond J. 2017;39:10–20.
Suchomel TJ, Comfort P, Stone MH. Weightlifting pulling derivatives: Rationale for implementation and application. Sport Med. 2015;45:823–839. PubMed
Tufano JJ, Brown LE, Haff GG. Theoretical and practical aspects of different cluster set structures: a systematic review. J Strength Cond Res. 2017a;31:848–867. PubMed
Tufano JJ, Conlon JA, Nimphius S, Brown LE, Petkovic A, Frick J, Haff GG. Effects of cluster sets and rest-redistribution on mechanical responses to back squats in trained men. J Hum Kinet. 2017b;58:35–43. PubMed PMC
Tufano JJ, Conlon JA, Nimphius S, Brown LE, Seitz LB, Williamson BD, Haff GG. Maintenance of velocity and power with cluster sets during high-volume back squats. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11:885–892. PubMed
Tufano JJ, Halaj M, Kampmiller T, Novosad A, Buzgo G. Cluster sets vs. traditional sets: Levelling out the playing field using a power-based threshold. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0208035. PubMed PMC
Winchester JB, Erickson TM, Blaak JB, McBride JM. Changes in bar-path kinematics and kinetics after power-clean training. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:177–183. PubMed
Impact of Rest-Redistribution on Fatigue During Maximal Eccentric Knee Extensions