Rest Redistribution Functions as a Free and Ad-Hoc Equivalent to Commonly used Velocity-Based Training Thresholds During Clean Pulls at Different Loads

. 2019 Aug ; 68 () : 5-16. [epub] 20190821

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid31531129

This study determined whether redistributing total rest time into shorter, but more frequent rest periods could maintain velocity and power output during 3 traditional sets of 6 clean pulls using 80% (TS80), 100% (TS100) and 120% (TS120) of power clean 1RM with 180 seconds of inter-set rest and during 3 "rest redistribution" protocols of 9 sets of 2 clean pulls using 80% (RR80), 100% (RR100) and 120% (RR120) of power clean 1RM with 45 seconds of inter-set rest. The total number of repetitions performed above 10 and 20% velocity loss thresholds, mean and peak velocity maintenance (the average of all 18 repetitions relative to the best repetition; MVM, PVM), and decline (the worst repetition relative to the best repetition; MVD, PVD) were calculated. For MVM, PVM, MVD, and PVD, there were small-to-moderate effect sizes in favour of RR80 and RR100, but large effects favouring RR120, compared to their respective TS protocols. The number of repetitions within a 20% velocity loss threshold was 17.7 ± 0.6 during RR and 16.5 ± 2.4 during TS (effect size 0.69); and the number of repetitions within a 10% velocity loss threshold was about 13.1 ± 3.7 during RR and 10.7 ± 3.6 during TS (effect size 0.66). Therefore, RR generally allowed for a better overall maintenance of velocity and power, especially at heavy loads. Coaches who wish to implement velocity-based training, but who do not wish to purchase or use the associated equipment, may consider rest-redistribution to encourage similar training stimuli.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Banyard HG, Nosaka K, Sato K, Haff GG. Validity of various methods for determining velocity, force, and power in the back squat. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12:1170–1176. PubMed

DeWeese BH, Serrano AJ, Scruggs SK, Sams ML. The clean pull and snatch pull: proper technique for weightlifting movement derivatives. Strength Cond J. 2012;34:82–86.

Garhammer J. Power clean: Kinesiological evaluation. Strength Cond J. 1984;6:40.

González-Badillo JJ, Yañez-García JM, Mora-Custodio R, Rodríguez-Rosell D. Velocity loss as a variable for monitoring resistance exercise. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38:217–225. PubMed

Gorostiaga EM, Navarro-Amézqueta I, Calbet JA, Hellsten Y, Cusso R, Guerrero M, Granados C, Gonzalez-Izal M, Ibanez J, Izquierdo M. Energy metabolism during repeated sets of leg press exercise leading to failure or not. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e40621. PubMed PMC

Gorostiaga EM, Navarro-Amézqueta I, Calbet JA, Sánchez-Medina L, Cusso R, Guerrero M, Izquierdo M. Blood ammonia and lactate as markers of muscle metabolites during leg press exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28:2775–2785. PubMed

Hardee JP, Lawrence MM, Utter AC, Triplett NT, Zwetsloot KA, McBride JM. Effect of inter-repetition rest on ratings of perceived exertion during multiple sets of the power clean. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012a;112:3141–3147. PubMed

Hardee JP, Triplett NT, Utter AC, Zwetsloot KA, McBride JM. Effect of interrepetition rest on power output in the power clean. J Strength Cond Res. 2012b;26:883–889. PubMed

Jovanović M, Flanagan EP. Researched applications of velocity based strength training. J Aust Strength Cond. 2014;22:58–69.

Joy J, Oliver J, McCleary S, Lowery R, Wilson J. Power output and electromyography activity of the back squat exercise with cluster sets. J Sports Sci. 2013;1:37–45.

Jukic I, Tufano JJ. Shorter but more frequent rest periods: no effect on velocity and power compared to traditional sets not performed to failure. J Hum Kinet. 2019;66:257–268. PubMed PMC

Mayo X, Iglesias-Soler E, Fernández-Del-Olmo M. Effects of set configuration of resistance exercise on perceived exertion. Percept Mot Skills. 2014;119:825–837. PubMed

Oliver JM, Kreutzer A, Jenke SC, Phillips MD, Mitchell JB, Jones MT. Velocity drives greater power observed during back squat using cluster sets. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30:235–243. PubMed

Orange ST, Metcalfe JW, Marshall P, Vince RV, Madden LA, Liefeith A. Test-retest reliability of a commercial linear position transducer (GymAware PowerTool) to measure velocity and power in the back squat and bench press. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 (Epub ahead of print) PubMed

Padulo J, Mignogna P, Mignardi S, Tonni F, D’Ottavio S. Effect of different pushing speeds on bench press. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33:376–380. PubMed

Pareja-Blanco F, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Sánchez-Medina L, Gorostiaga E, González-Badillo J. Effect of movement velocity during resistance training on neuromuscular performance. Int J Sports Med. 2014;35:916–924. PubMed

Pareja-Blanco F, Sánchez-Medina L, Suárez-Arrones L, González-Badillo JJ. Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on performance in professional soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017a;12:512–519. PubMed

Pareja-Blanco F, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Sánchez-Medina L, Sanchis-Moysi J, Dorado C, Mora-Custodio R, Calbet JA. Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains and muscle adaptations. Scand J Med Sci. 2017b;27:724–735. PubMed

Sanchez-Medina L, González-Badillo JJ. Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1725–1734. PubMed

Suchomel TJ, Comfort P, Lake JP. Enhancing the force-velocity profile of athletes using weightlifting derivatives. Strength Cond J. 2017;39:10–20.

Suchomel TJ, Comfort P, Stone MH. Weightlifting pulling derivatives: Rationale for implementation and application. Sport Med. 2015;45:823–839. PubMed

Tufano JJ, Brown LE, Haff GG. Theoretical and practical aspects of different cluster set structures: a systematic review. J Strength Cond Res. 2017a;31:848–867. PubMed

Tufano JJ, Conlon JA, Nimphius S, Brown LE, Petkovic A, Frick J, Haff GG. Effects of cluster sets and rest-redistribution on mechanical responses to back squats in trained men. J Hum Kinet. 2017b;58:35–43. PubMed PMC

Tufano JJ, Conlon JA, Nimphius S, Brown LE, Seitz LB, Williamson BD, Haff GG. Maintenance of velocity and power with cluster sets during high-volume back squats. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11:885–892. PubMed

Tufano JJ, Halaj M, Kampmiller T, Novosad A, Buzgo G. Cluster sets vs. traditional sets: Levelling out the playing field using a power-based threshold. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0208035. PubMed PMC

Winchester JB, Erickson TM, Blaak JB, McBride JM. Changes in bar-path kinematics and kinetics after power-clean training. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:177–183. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...