Many studies correlate changes in human gut microbiome with the onset of various diseases, mostly by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Setting up the optimal sampling and DNA isolation procedures is crucial for robustness and reproducibility of the results. We performed a systematic comparison of several sampling and DNA isolation kits, quantified their effect on bacterial gDNA quality and the bacterial composition estimates at all taxonomic levels. Sixteen volunteers tested three sampling kits. All samples were consequently processed by two DNA isolation kits. We found that the choice of both stool sampling and DNA isolation kits have an effect on bacterial composition with respect to Gram-positivity, however the isolation kit had a stronger effect than the sampling kit. The proportion of bacteria affected by isolation and sampling kits was larger at higher taxa levels compared to lower taxa levels. The PowerLyzer PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit outperformed the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit mainly due to better lysis of Gram-positive bacteria while keeping the values of all the other assessed parameters within a reasonable range. The presented effects need to be taken into account when comparing results across multiple studies or computing ratios between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

Department of Biomedical Engineering Brno University of Technology Technicka 12 Brno Czech Republic

RECETOX Faculty of Science Masaryk University Kamenice 5 625 00 Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Suau A, et al. Direct analysis of genes encoding 16S rRNA from complex communities reveals many novel molecular species within the human gut. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999;65:4799–807. PubMed PMC

Zoetendal EG, et al. Mucosa-associated bacteria in the human gastrointestinal tract are uniformly distributed along the colon and differ from the community recovered from feces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002;68:3401–7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.7.3401-3407.2002. PubMed DOI PMC

Russell SL, et al. Perinatal antibiotic treatment affects murine microbiota, immune responses and allergic asthma. Gut Microbes. 2013;4:158–64. doi: 10.4161/gmic.23567. PubMed DOI PMC

Jandhyala SM, et al. Role of the normal gut microbiota. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015;21:8787–803. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i29.8787. PubMed DOI PMC

Matamoros S, Gras-Leguen C, Le Vacon F, Potel G, De La Cochetiere MF. Development of intestinal microbiota in infants and its impact on health. Trends in Microbiology. 2013;21:167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.12.001. PubMed DOI

Underwood MA. Intestinal dysbiosis: Novel mechanisms by which gut microbes trigger and prevent disease. Prev. Med. (Baltim). 2014;65:133–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.05.010. PubMed DOI

Zhang Y-J, et al. Impacts of gut bacteria on human health and diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015;16:7493–519. doi: 10.3390/ijms16047493. PubMed DOI PMC

Mackenzie BW, Waite DW, Taylor MW. Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differences. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:130. PubMed PMC

Yatsunenko T, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. 2012;486:222–227. doi: 10.1038/nature11053. PubMed DOI PMC

Abeles SR, et al. Microbial diversity in individuals and their household contacts following typical antibiotic courses. Microbiome. 2016;4:39. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0187-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Korpela K, de Vos W. Antibiotic use in childhood alters the gut microbiota and predisposes to overweight. Microb. Cell. 2016;3:296–298. doi: 10.15698/mic2016.07.514. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhernakova A, et al. Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Science. 2016;352:565–9. doi: 10.1126/science.aad3369. PubMed DOI PMC

Graf D, et al. Contribution of diet to the composition of the human gut microbiota. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015;26:26164. PubMed PMC

Gorvitovskaia A, Holmes SP, Huse SM. Interpreting Prevotella and Bacteroides as biomarkers of diet and lifestyle. Microbiome. 2016;4:15. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0160-7. PubMed DOI PMC

Claus SP, Guillou H, Ellero-Simatos S. The gut microbiota: a major player in the toxicity of environmental pollutants? npj Biofilms Microbiomes. 2016;2:16003. doi: 10.1038/npjbiofilms.2016.3. PubMed DOI PMC

Madan JC, Farzan SF, Hibberd PL, Karagas MR. Normal neonatal microbiome variation in relation to environmental factors, infection and allergy. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2012;24:753–9. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32835a1ac8. PubMed DOI PMC

Schultze A, et al. Comparison of stool collection on site versus at home in a population-based study. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforsch. - Gesundheitsschutz. 2014;57:1264–1269. doi: 10.1007/s00103-014-2051-z. PubMed DOI PMC

Feigelson HS, et al. Feasibility of self-collection of fecal specimens by randomly sampled women for health-related studies of the gut microbiome. BMC Res. Notes. 2014;7:204. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-204. PubMed DOI PMC

Loftfield E, et al. Comparison of collection methods for fecal samples for discovery metabolomics in epidemiologic studies. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25:1483–1490. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0409. PubMed DOI PMC

Tedjo DI, et al. The effect of sampling and storage on the fecal microbiota composition in healthy and diseased subjects. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0126685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126685. PubMed DOI PMC

Mathay C, et al. Method Optimization for Fecal Sample Collection and Fecal DNA Extraction. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2015;13:79–93. doi: 10.1089/bio.2014.0031. PubMed DOI

Panek M, et al. Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota – effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologies. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:5143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23296-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Lauber CL, Zhou N, Gordon JI, Knight R, Fierer N. Effect of storage conditions on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and human-associated samples. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010;307:80–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01965.x. PubMed DOI PMC

Cardona. Storage conditions of intestinal microbiota matter in metagenomic analysis. BMC Microbiol. 12, 158 (2012). PubMed PMC

Gorzelak MA, et al. Methods for improving human gut microbiome data by reducing variability through sample processing and storage of stool. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134802. PubMed DOI PMC

Maukonen J, Simões C, Saarela M. The currently used commercial DNA-extraction methods give different results of clostridial and actinobacterial populations derived from human fecal samples. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012;79:697–708. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01257.x. PubMed DOI

Hill CJ, et al. Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants. Microbiome. 2016;4:19. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0164-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Choo JM, Leong LEX, Rogers GB. Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:16350. doi: 10.1038/srep16350. PubMed DOI PMC

Kim D, et al. Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research. Microbiome. 2017;5:52. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Yuan S, Cohen DB, Ravel J, Abdo Z, Forney LJ. Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction and Purification of DNA from the Human Microbiome. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033865. PubMed DOI PMC

Janabi AHD, Kerkhof LJ, McGuinness LR, Biddle AS, McKeever KH. Comparison of a modified phenol/chloroform and commercial-kit methods for extracting DNA from horse fecal material. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2016;129:14–19. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.07.019. PubMed DOI

Kennedy NA, et al. The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. PLoS One. 2014;9:e88982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088982. PubMed DOI PMC

Smith B, Li N, Andersen AS, Slotved HC, Krogfelt KA. Optimising bacterial DNA extraction from faecal samples: comparison of three methods. Open Microbiol. J. 2011;5:14–7. doi: 10.2174/1874285801105010014. PubMed DOI PMC

Santiago A, et al. Processing faecal samples: a step forward for standards in microbial community analysis. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14:112. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-112. PubMed DOI PMC

Gerasimidis K, et al. The effect of DNA extraction methodology on gut microbiota research applications. BMC Res. Notes. 2016;9:365. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2171-7. PubMed DOI PMC

Claassen S, et al. A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2013;94:103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.05.008. PubMed DOI PMC

Salonen A, et al. Comparative analysis of fecal DNA extraction methods with phylogenetic microarray: Effective recovery of bacterial and archaeal DNA using mechanical cell lysis. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2010;81:127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.02.007. PubMed DOI

Lim MY, Song E-J, Kim SH, Lee J, Nam Y-D. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2018;41:151–157. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2017.11.008. PubMed DOI

Costea PI, et al. Towards standards for human fecal sample processing in metagenomic studies. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017;35:1069–1076. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3960. PubMed DOI

Walker AW, et al. 16S rRNA gene-based profiling of the human infant gut microbiota is strongly influenced by sample processing and PCR primer choice. Microbiome. 2015;3:26. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0087-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Cruaud P, et al. Influence of DNA Extraction Method, 16S rRNA Targeted Hypervariable Regions, and Sample Origin on Microbial Diversity Detected by 454 Pyrosequencing in Marine Chemosynthetic Ecosystems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014;80:4626–4639. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00592-14. PubMed DOI PMC

Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL. Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027310. PubMed DOI PMC

Clooney AG, et al. Comparing Apples and Oranges?: Next Generation Sequencing and Its Impact on Microbiome Analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148028. PubMed DOI PMC

Lozupone CA, et al. Meta-analyses of studies of the human microbiota. Genome Res. 2013;23:1704–1714. doi: 10.1101/gr.151803.112. PubMed DOI PMC

Fu BC, et al. Characterization of the gut microbiome in epidemiologic studies: the multiethnic cohort experience. Ann. Epidemiol. 2016;26:373–379. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.02.009. PubMed DOI PMC

Hsieh Y-H, et al. Impact of Different Fecal Processing Methods on Assessments of Bacterial Diversity in the Human Intestine. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1643. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01643. PubMed DOI PMC

Lozupone CA, Stombaugh JI, Gordon JI, Jansson JK, Knight R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2012;489:220–30. doi: 10.1038/nature11550. PubMed DOI PMC

Bürgmann H, Pesaro M, Widmer F, Zeyer J. A strategy for optimizing quality and quantity of DNA extracted from soil. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2001;45:7–20. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00213-5. PubMed DOI

Schrader C, Schielke A, Ellerbroek L, Johne R. PCR inhibitors - occurrence, properties and removal. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012;113:1014–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05384.x. PubMed DOI

Oikarinen S, et al. PCR inhibition in stool samples in relation to age of infants. J. Clin. Virol. 2009;44:211–214. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2008.12.017. PubMed DOI

Lewis JD, et al. Inflammation, Antibiotics, and Diet as Environmental Stressors of the Gut Microbiome in Pediatric Crohn’s Disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;18:489–500. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.09.008. PubMed DOI PMC

TEIXEIRA Y, et al. Human dna quantification in the stools of patients with colorectal cancer. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2015;52:293–298. doi: 10.1590/S0004-28032015000400008. PubMed DOI

Varela E, et al. Faecal DNA and calprotectin as biomarkers of acute intestinal toxicity in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2009;30:175–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04019.x. PubMed DOI

Zou H, Harrington JJ, Klatt KK, Ahlquist DA. A sensitive method to quantify human long DNA in stool: relevance to colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1115–9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0992. PubMed DOI

Klaassen CHW, et al. Quantification of human DNA in feces as a diagnostic test for the presence of colorectal cancer. Clin. Chem. 2003;49:1185–7. doi: 10.1373/49.7.1185. PubMed DOI

Hespell RB, Kato K, Costerton JW. Characterization of the cell wall of Butyrivibrio species. Can. J. Microbiol. 1993;39:912–921. doi: 10.1139/m93-139. PubMed DOI

Thompson BG, Murray RG. Isolation and characterization of the plasma membrane and the outer membrane of Deinococcus radiodurans strain Sark. Can. J. Microbiol. 1981;27:729–34. doi: 10.1139/m81-111. PubMed DOI

Karlsson FH, et al. Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Nature. 2013;498:99–103. doi: 10.1038/nature12198. PubMed DOI

Li E, et al. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Phenotype, C. difficile and NOD2 Genotype Are Associated with Shifts in Human Ileum Associated Microbial Composition. PLoS One. 2012;7:e26284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026284. PubMed DOI PMC

Gevers D, et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn’s disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15:382–392. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.005. PubMed DOI PMC

Gao Z, Guo B, Gao R, Zhu Q, Qin H. Microbiota disbiosis is associated with colorectal cancer. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:20. PubMed PMC

Turnbaugh PJ, et al. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444:1027–31. doi: 10.1038/nature05414. PubMed DOI

Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature. 2006;444:1022–1023. doi: 10.1038/4441022a. PubMed DOI

Larsen N, et al. Gut microbiota in human adults with type 2 diabetes differs from non-diabetic adults. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009085. PubMed DOI PMC

Tanaka S, Yamamoto K, Yamada K, Furuya K, Uyeno Y. Relationship of Enhanced Butyrate Production by Colonic Butyrate-Producing Bacteria to Immunomodulatory Effects in Normal Mice Fed an Insoluble Fraction of Brassica rapa L. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;82:2693–9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03343-15. PubMed DOI PMC

Murri M, et al. Gut microbiota in children with type 1 diabetes differs from that in healthy children: a case-control study. BMC Med. 2013;11:46. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-46. PubMed DOI PMC

Cheng J, et al. Duodenal microbiota composition and mucosal homeostasis in pediatric celiac disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-113. PubMed DOI PMC

Chen W, Liu F, Ling Z, Tong X, Xiang C. Human intestinal lumen and mucosa-associated microbiota in patients with colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039743. PubMed DOI PMC

Hong P-Y, Croix JA, Greenberg E, Gaskins HR, Mackie RI. Pyrosequencing-based analysis of the mucosal microbiota in healthy individuals reveals ubiquitous bacterial groups and micro-heterogeneity. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025042. PubMed DOI PMC

Bajaj JS, et al. Colonic mucosal microbiome differs from stool microbiome in cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy and is linked to cognition and inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2012;303:G675–85. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00152.2012. PubMed DOI PMC

Schnabl B, Brenner DA. Interactions between the intestinal microbiome and liver diseases. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1513–1524. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.01.020. PubMed DOI PMC

Org E, et al. Relationships between gut microbiota, plasma metabolites, and metabolic syndrome traits in the METSIM cohort. Genome Biol. 2017;18:70. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1194-2. PubMed DOI PMC

Lippert K., Kedenko L., Antonielli L., Kedenko I., Gemeier C., Leitner M., Kautzky-Willer A., Paulweber B., Hackl E. Gut microbiota dysbiosis associated with glucose metabolism disorders and the metabolic syndrome in older adults. Beneficial Microbes. 2017;8(4):545–556. doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0184. PubMed DOI

Biagi E, et al. Gut microbiome in Down syndrome. PLoS One. 2014;9:e112023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112023. PubMed DOI PMC

Wang L, et al. Increased abundance of Sutterella spp. and Ruminococcus torques in feces of children with autism spectrum disorder. Mol. Autism. 2013;4:42. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-4-42. PubMed DOI PMC

Mukhopadhya I, et al. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Colonic Mucosal Isolates of Sutterella wadsworthensis from Inflammatory Bowel Disease. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027076. PubMed DOI PMC

Vandeputte D, et al. Stool consistency is strongly associated with gut microbiota richness and composition, enterotypes and bacterial growth rates. Gut. 2016;65:57–62. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309618. PubMed DOI PMC

Falony G, et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science. 2016;352:560–4. doi: 10.1126/science.aad3503. PubMed DOI

Klindworth A, et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks808. PubMed DOI PMC

Chen HM, Lifschitz CH. Preparation of fecal samples for assay of volatile fatty acids by gas-liquid chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography. Clin. Chem. 1989;35:74–76. PubMed

Pagés, H., Aboyout, P., Gentleman, R. & Biostrings, D. S. String objects representing biological sequences, and matching algorithms (2016).

R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2016).

Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2194–2200. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381. PubMed DOI PMC

Pruesse E, et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:7188–7196. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm864. PubMed DOI PMC

Lozupone C, Knight R. UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:8228–8235. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005. PubMed DOI PMC

Aitchison, J. (John). The statistical analysis of compositional data. (Chapman and Hall, 1986).

Sedlar, K., Videnska, P., Skutkova, H., Rychlik, I. & Provaznik, I. Bipartite graphs for visualization analysis of microbiome data. Evol. Bioinforma. 12 (2016). PubMed PMC

Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2008;2008:P10008. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008. DOI

Bastian, M., Heymann, S. & Jacomy, M. Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks Visualization and Exploration of Large Graphs.

Maeda Hiroshi, Fujimoto Chiyo, Haruki Yasuhiro, Maeda Takemasa, Kokeguchi Susumu, Petelin Millan, Arai Hideo, Tanimoto Ichiro, Nishimura Fusanori, Takashiba Shogo. Quantitative real-time PCR using TaqMan and SYBR Green forActinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans,Porphyromonas gingivalis,Prevotella intermedia,tetQgene and total bacteria. FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology. 2003;39(1):81–86. doi: 10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00224-4. PubMed DOI

Vandesompele, J. et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3, RESEARCH0034 (2002). PubMed PMC

Impact of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis on the oral and fecal bacteriomes of children in the first week of life