Lenalidomide-based induction and maintenance in elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: updated results of the EMN01 randomized trial
Language English Country Italy Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
31582542
PubMed Central
PMC7327625
DOI
10.3324/haematol.2019.226407
PII: haematol.2019.226407
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Dexamethasone therapeutic use MeSH
- Progression-Free Survival MeSH
- Lenalidomide therapeutic use MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Melphalan therapeutic use MeSH
- Multiple Myeloma * diagnosis drug therapy MeSH
- Prednisone therapeutic use MeSH
- Disease-Free Survival MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Maintenance Chemotherapy MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Dexamethasone MeSH
- Lenalidomide MeSH
- Melphalan MeSH
- Prednisone MeSH
n the EMN01 trial, the addition of an alkylator (melphalan or cyclophosphamide) to lenalidomide-steroid induction therapy was prospectively evaluated in transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma. After induction, patients were randomly assigned to maintenance treatment with lenalidomide alone or with prednisone continuously. The analysis presented here (median follow-up of 71 months) is focused on maintenance treatment and on subgroup analyses defined according to the International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Score. Of the 654 evaluable patients, 217 were in the lenalidomide-dexamethasone arm, 217 in the melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide arm and 220 in the cyclophosphamide-prednisone-lenalidomide arm. With regards to the Frailty Score, 284 (43%) patients were fit, 205 (31%) were intermediate-fit and 165 (25%) were frail. After induction, 402 patients were eligible for maintenance therapy (lenalidomide arm, n=204; lenalidomide-prednisone arm, n=198). After a median duration of maintenance of 22.0 months, progression-free survival from the start of maintenance was 22.2 months with lenalidomide-prednisone vs 18.6 months with lenalidomide (hazard ratio 0.85, P=0.14), with no differences across frailty subgroups. The most frequent grade ≥3 toxicity was neutropenia (10% of lenalidomide-prednisone and 21% of lenalidomide patients; P=0.001). Grade ≥3 non-hematologic adverse events were rare (<15%). In fit patients, melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared to cyclophosphamide-prednisone-lenalidomide (hazard ratio 0.72, P=0.05) and lenalidomide-dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0.72, P=0.04). Likewise, a trend towards a better overall survival was noted for patients treated with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide or cyclophosphamide-prednisone-lenalidomide, as compared to lenalidomide-dexamethasone. No differences were observed in intermediate-fit and frail patients. This analysis showed positive outcomes of maintenance with lenalidomide-based regimens, with a good safety profile. For the first time, we showed that fit patients benefit from a full-dose triplet regimen, while intermediate-fit and frail patients benefit from gentler regimens. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01093196.
Azienda Ospedaliera S Croce Carle Cuneo Italy
Department of Hematooncology University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Divisione di Ematologia Ospedale S Gerardo Monza Italy
Ematologia e Centro Trapianti IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Genova Italy
Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit Az Osp S Camillo Forlanini Rome Italy
Hematology Azienda Policlinico Umberto 1 Roma Italy
Istituto Clinico Humanitas Humanitas University Rozzano Milano Italy
Medical Oncology Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO IRCCS Candiolo Italy
Reparto Ematologia e Centro TMO Ospedale Centrale Bolzano Italy
SSD Ematologia ASLTO4 Ospedali di Chivasso Cirié Ivrea Italy
U O Ematologia Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci Ravenna Italy
UO Ematologia Ospedale di Rimini AUSL della Romagna Rimini Italy
UOC Ematologia AO Cosenza Cosenza Italy
See more in PubMed
Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(11):1046-1060. PubMed
Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Caravita T, et al. Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;367(9513):825-831. PubMed
San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(9):906-917. PubMed
Benboubker L, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, et al. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(10):906-917. PubMed
Palumbo A, Hajek R, Delforge M, et al. Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1759-1769. PubMed
Jackson GH, Davies FE, Pawlyn C, et al. Lenalidomide maintenance versus observation for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multi-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(1):57-73. PubMed PMC
Gay F, Oliva S, Petrucci MT, et al. Chemotherapy plus lenalidomide versus autologous transplantation, followed by lenalidomide plus prednisone versus lenalidomide maintenance, in patients with multiple myeloma: a randomised, multi-centre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(16):1617-1629. PubMed
Larocca A, Dold SM, Zweegman S, et al. Patient-centered practice in elderly myeloma patients: an overview and consensus from the European Myeloma Network (EMN). Leukemia 2018;32(8):1697-1712. PubMed
Salvini M, D’Agostino M, Bonello F, Boccadoro M, Bringhen S. Determining treatment intensity in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(9):917-930. PubMed
Magarotto V, Bringhen S, Offidani M, et al. Triplet vs. doublet lenalidomide-containing regimens for the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;127(9):1102-1108. PubMed
Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Mateos M-V, et al. Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: an International Myeloma Working Group report. Blood. 2015;125(13):2068-2074. PubMed PMC
Franssen LE, Nijhof IS, Bjorklund CC, et al. Lenalidomide combined with low-dose cyclophosphamide and prednisone modulates Ikaros and Aiolos in lymphocytes, resulting in immunostimulatory effects in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma patients. Oncotarget. 2018;9(74):34009-34021. PubMed PMC
Nakagawa M, Terashima T, D’yachkova Y, Bondy GP, Hogg JC, van Eeden SF. Glucocorticoid-induced granulocytosis: contribution of marrow release and demargination of intravascular granulocytes. Circulation. 1998;98(21):2307-2313. PubMed
Stewart AK, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(2):142-152. PubMed
Jakubowiak AJ, Dytfeld D, Griffith KA, et al. A phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone as a frontline treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2012;120(9): 1801-1809. PubMed PMC
Facon T, Hulin C, Dimopoulos MA, et al. A frailty scale predicts outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for transplant treated with continuous lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone on the FIRST trial. Blood. 2015;126(23). Abstract #4239 [ASH 2015 57th Meeting].
Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, et al. Final analysis of survival outcomes in the phase 3 FIRST trial of up-front treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;131(3):301-310. PubMed PMC
Facon T, Kumar SK, Plesner T, et al. Phase 3 randomized study of daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) ineligible for transplant (MAIA). Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1). Abstract #LBA-2 [ASH 2018 60th Meeting].
Larocca A, Salvini M, De Paoli L, et al. Efficacy and feasibility of dose/schedule-adjusted Rd-R vs. continuous Rd in elderly and intermediate-fit newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients: RV-MM-PI-0752 phase III randomized study. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1). Abstract #305 [ASH 2018 60th Meeting].
Durie BG, Hoering A, Sexton R, et al. Longer term follow up of the randomized phase III trial SWOG S0777: bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone vs. lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients (pts) with previously untreated multiple myeloma without an intent for immediate autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1). Abstract #1992 [ASH 2018 60th Meeting]. PubMed PMC
Mateos M-V, Dimopoulos MA, Cavo M, et al. Daratumumab plus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone for untreated myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(6):518-528. PubMed
Ocio EM, Otero PR, Bringhen S, et al. Preliminary results from a phase I study of isatuximab (ISA) in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (VRd) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) non-eligible for transplant. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1). Abstract #595 [ASH 2018 60th Meeting].
Facon T, Kumar S, Plesner T, et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for untreated myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(22):2104-2115. PubMed PMC
Dimopoulos MA, Mateos M-V, Cavo M, et al. One-year update of a phase 3 randomized study of daratumumab plus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (D-VMP) versus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) in patients (pts) with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): Alcyone. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1). Abstract #156 (ASH 2018 60th Meeting].
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01093196