Lenalidomide-based induction and maintenance in elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: updated results of the EMN01 randomized trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
31582542
PubMed Central
PMC7327625
DOI
10.3324/haematol.2019.226407
PII: haematol.2019.226407
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dexamethason terapeutické užití MeSH
- doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
- lenalidomid terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- melfalan terapeutické užití MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom * diagnóza farmakoterapie MeSH
- prednison terapeutické užití MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- udržovací chemoterapie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- dexamethason MeSH
- lenalidomid MeSH
- melfalan MeSH
- prednison MeSH
n the EMN01 trial, the addition of an alkylator (melphalan or cyclophosphamide) to lenalidomide-steroid induction therapy was prospectively evaluated in transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma. After induction, patients were randomly assigned to maintenance treatment with lenalidomide alone or with prednisone continuously. The analysis presented here (median follow-up of 71 months) is focused on maintenance treatment and on subgroup analyses defined according to the International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Score. Of the 654 evaluable patients, 217 were in the lenalidomide-dexamethasone arm, 217 in the melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide arm and 220 in the cyclophosphamide-prednisone-lenalidomide arm. With regards to the Frailty Score, 284 (43%) patients were fit, 205 (31%) were intermediate-fit and 165 (25%) were frail. After induction, 402 patients were eligible for maintenance therapy (lenalidomide arm, n=204; lenalidomide-prednisone arm, n=198). After a median duration of maintenance of 22.0 months, progression-free survival from the start of maintenance was 22.2 months with lenalidomide-prednisone vs 18.6 months with lenalidomide (hazard ratio 0.85, P=0.14), with no differences across frailty subgroups. The most frequent grade ≥3 toxicity was neutropenia (10% of lenalidomide-prednisone and 21% of lenalidomide patients; P=0.001). Grade ≥3 non-hematologic adverse events were rare (<15%). In fit patients, melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared to cyclophosphamide-prednisone-lenalidomide (hazard ratio 0.72, P=0.05) and lenalidomide-dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0.72, P=0.04). Likewise, a trend towards a better overall survival was noted for patients treated with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide or cyclophosphamide-prednisone-lenalidomide, as compared to lenalidomide-dexamethasone. No differences were observed in intermediate-fit and frail patients. This analysis showed positive outcomes of maintenance with lenalidomide-based regimens, with a good safety profile. For the first time, we showed that fit patients benefit from a full-dose triplet regimen, while intermediate-fit and frail patients benefit from gentler regimens. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01093196.
Azienda Ospedaliera S Croce Carle Cuneo Italy
Department of Hematooncology University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Divisione di Ematologia Ospedale S Gerardo Monza Italy
Ematologia e Centro Trapianti IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Genova Italy
Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit Az Osp S Camillo Forlanini Rome Italy
Hematology Azienda Policlinico Umberto 1 Roma Italy
Istituto Clinico Humanitas Humanitas University Rozzano Milano Italy
Medical Oncology Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO IRCCS Candiolo Italy
Reparto Ematologia e Centro TMO Ospedale Centrale Bolzano Italy
SSD Ematologia ASLTO4 Ospedali di Chivasso Cirié Ivrea Italy
U O Ematologia Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci Ravenna Italy
UO Ematologia Ospedale di Rimini AUSL della Romagna Rimini Italy
UOC Ematologia AO Cosenza Cosenza Italy
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(11):1046-1060. PubMed
Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Caravita T, et al. Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;367(9513):825-831. PubMed
San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(9):906-917. PubMed
Benboubker L, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, et al. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(10):906-917. PubMed
Palumbo A, Hajek R, Delforge M, et al. Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1759-1769. PubMed
Jackson GH, Davies FE, Pawlyn C, et al. Lenalidomide maintenance versus observation for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multi-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(1):57-73. PubMed PMC
Gay F, Oliva S, Petrucci MT, et al. Chemotherapy plus lenalidomide versus autologous transplantation, followed by lenalidomide plus prednisone versus lenalidomide maintenance, in patients with multiple myeloma: a randomised, multi-centre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(16):1617-1629. PubMed
Larocca A, Dold SM, Zweegman S, et al. Patient-centered practice in elderly myeloma patients: an overview and consensus from the European Myeloma Network (EMN). Leukemia 2018;32(8):1697-1712. PubMed
Salvini M, D’Agostino M, Bonello F, Boccadoro M, Bringhen S. Determining treatment intensity in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(9):917-930. PubMed
Magarotto V, Bringhen S, Offidani M, et al. Triplet vs. doublet lenalidomide-containing regimens for the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;127(9):1102-1108. PubMed
Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Mateos M-V, et al. Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: an International Myeloma Working Group report. Blood. 2015;125(13):2068-2074. PubMed PMC
Franssen LE, Nijhof IS, Bjorklund CC, et al. Lenalidomide combined with low-dose cyclophosphamide and prednisone modulates Ikaros and Aiolos in lymphocytes, resulting in immunostimulatory effects in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma patients. Oncotarget. 2018;9(74):34009-34021. PubMed PMC
Nakagawa M, Terashima T, D’yachkova Y, Bondy GP, Hogg JC, van Eeden SF. Glucocorticoid-induced granulocytosis: contribution of marrow release and demargination of intravascular granulocytes. Circulation. 1998;98(21):2307-2313. PubMed
Stewart AK, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(2):142-152. PubMed
Jakubowiak AJ, Dytfeld D, Griffith KA, et al. A phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone as a frontline treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2012;120(9): 1801-1809. PubMed PMC
Facon T, Hulin C, Dimopoulos MA, et al. A frailty scale predicts outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for transplant treated with continuous lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone on the FIRST trial. Blood. 2015;126(23). Abstract #4239 [ASH 2015 57th Meeting].
Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, et al. Final analysis of survival outcomes in the phase 3 FIRST trial of up-front treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;131(3):301-310. PubMed PMC
Facon T, Kumar SK, Plesner T, et al. Phase 3 randomized study of daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) ineligible for transplant (MAIA). Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1). Abstract #LBA-2 [ASH 2018 60th Meeting].
Larocca A, Salvini M, De Paoli L, et al. Efficacy and feasibility of dose/schedule-adjusted Rd-R vs. continuous Rd in elderly and intermediate-fit newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients: RV-MM-PI-0752 phase III randomized study. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1). Abstract #305 [ASH 2018 60th Meeting].
Durie BG, Hoering A, Sexton R, et al. Longer term follow up of the randomized phase III trial SWOG S0777: bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone vs. lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients (pts) with previously untreated multiple myeloma without an intent for immediate autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1). Abstract #1992 [ASH 2018 60th Meeting]. PubMed PMC
Mateos M-V, Dimopoulos MA, Cavo M, et al. Daratumumab plus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone for untreated myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(6):518-528. PubMed
Ocio EM, Otero PR, Bringhen S, et al. Preliminary results from a phase I study of isatuximab (ISA) in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (VRd) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) non-eligible for transplant. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1). Abstract #595 [ASH 2018 60th Meeting].
Facon T, Kumar S, Plesner T, et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for untreated myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(22):2104-2115. PubMed PMC
Dimopoulos MA, Mateos M-V, Cavo M, et al. One-year update of a phase 3 randomized study of daratumumab plus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (D-VMP) versus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) in patients (pts) with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): Alcyone. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1). Abstract #156 (ASH 2018 60th Meeting].
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01093196