Here, we present a practical overview of four commonly used validation methods for DNA methylation assessment: methylation specific restriction endonucleases (MSRE) analysis, pyrosequencing, methylation specific high-resolution DNA melting (MS-HRM) and quantitative methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (qMSP). Using these methods, we measured DNA methylation levels of three loci in human genome among which one was highly methylated, one intermediately methylated and one unmethylated. We compared the methods in terms of primer design demands, methods' feasibility, accuracy, time and money consumption, and usability for clinical diagnostics. Pyrosequencing and MS-HRM proved to be the most convenient methods. Using pyrosequencing, it is possible to analyze every CpG in a chosen region. The price of the instrument may represent the main limitation of this methodology. MS-HRM is a simple PCR-based method. The measurement was quick, cheap and very accurate. MSRE analysis is based on a methylation specific digestion of DNA. It does not require a bisulfite conversion of DNA as the other methods. MSRE analysis was very easy to perform, however, it was not suitable for intermediately methylated regions and it was also quite expensive. qMSP is a qPCR-based method that uses primers designed specifically for methylated and unmethylated alleles of a chosen region. This was the least accurate method and also the primer design and optimization of PCR conditions were highly demanding.

Institute of Clinical and Experimental Hematology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Czech Republic

Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Schubeler D. Function and information content of DNA methylation. Nature. 2015;517(7534):321. doi: 10.1038/nature14192. PubMed DOI

Jin Z, Liu Y. DNA methylation in human diseases. Genes & Diseases. 2018;5(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2018.01.002. PubMed DOI PMC

Levenson VV. DNA methylation as a universal biomarker. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2010;10(4):481–488. doi: 10.1586/erm.10.17. PubMed DOI PMC

Heyn H, Esteller M. DNA methylation profiling in the clinic: applications and challenges. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(10):679–692. doi: 10.1038/nrg3270. PubMed DOI

Pidsley R, Zotenko E, Peters TJ, Lawrence MG, Risbridger GP, Molloy P, et al. Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1066-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Lövkvist C, Dodd IB, Sneppen K, Haerter JO. DNA methylation in human epigenomes depends on local topology of CpG sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(11):5123–5132. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw124. PubMed DOI PMC

Cedar H, Solage A, Glaser G, Razin A. Direct detection of methylated cytosine in DNA by use of the restriction enzyme MspI. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979;6(6):2125–2132. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.6.2125. PubMed DOI PMC

Fraga MF, Esteller M. DNA Methylation: A Profile of Methods and Applications. BioTechniques. 2002;33(3):632–649. doi: 10.2144/02333rv01. PubMed DOI

Singer-Sam J, LeBon JM, Tanguay RL, Riggs AD. A quantitative Hpall-PCR assay to measure methylation of DNA from a small number of cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18(3):687. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.3.687. PubMed DOI PMC

Itoi E, Kokubun S, Hashimoto K, Roach HI. Improved Quantification of DNA Methylation Using Methylation-Sensitive Restriction Enzymes and Real-Time PCR. Epigenetics. 2007;2(2):86–91. doi: 10.4161/epi.2.2.4203. PubMed DOI

Kurdyukov S, Bullock M. DNA Methylation Analysis: Choosing the Right Method. Biology. 2016;5(1):3. doi: 10.3390/biology5010003. PubMed DOI PMC

Untergasser A, Nijveen H, Rao X, Bisseling T, Geurts R, Leunissen JAM. Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(suppl2):W74. PubMed PMC

Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S, Madden TL. Primer-BLAST: A tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC bioinformatics. 2012;13(1):134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-134. PubMed DOI PMC

Hayatsu H, Wataya Y, Kazushige K. Addition of sodium bisulfite to uracil and to cytosine. J Am Chem Soc. 1970;92(3):724–726. doi: 10.1021/ja00706a062. PubMed DOI

Sant KE, Nahar MS, Dolinoy DC. DNA methylation screening and analysis. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ). 2012;886:385–406. PubMed PMC

Hernández HG, Tse MY, Pang SC, Arboleda H, Forero DA. Optimizing methodologies for PCR-based DNA methylation analysis. BioTechniques. 2013;55(4):181–197. doi: 10.2144/000114087. PubMed DOI

Frommer M, Mcdonald LE, Millar DS, Collis CM, Watt F, Grigg GW, et al. A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. 1992. PubMed PMC

Reed K, Poulin ML, Yan L, Parissenti AM. Comparison of bisulfite sequencing PCR with pyrosequencing for measuring differences in DNA methylation. Anal Biochem. 2010;397(1):96–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.10.021. PubMed DOI

Tost J, El abdalaoui H, Glynne Gut I. Serial pyrosequencing for quantitative DNA methylation analysis. BioTechniques. 2006;40(6):721–726. doi: 10.2144/000112190. PubMed DOI

Delaney C, Garg SK, Yung R. Analysis of DNA methylation by pyrosequencing. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1343:249. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2963-4_19. PubMed DOI PMC

Tost J, Gut IG. DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(9):2265–2275. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.314. PubMed DOI

Li L.-C., Dahiya R. MethPrimer: designing primers for methylation PCRs. Bioinformatics. 2002;18(11):1427–1431. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.11.1427. PubMed DOI

Arányi T, Váradi A, Simon I, Tusnády GE. The BiSearch web server. BMC bioinformatics. 2006;7(1):431. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-431. PubMed DOI PMC

King CR, Scott-Horton T. Pyrosequencing. In: Marsh S, editor. Pyrosequencing protocols Totowa. NJ: Humana Press; 2007. pp. 39–55.

Guo D, Milewicz DM. Universal primer applications for pyrosequencing. In: Marsh S, editor. Pyrosequencing protocols Totowa. NJ: Humana Press; 2007. pp. 57–62. PubMed

Wojdacz TK, Dobrovic A. Methylation-sensitive high resolution melting (MS-HRM): a new approach for sensitive and high-throughput assessment of methylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(6):e41. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm013. PubMed DOI PMC

Tse MY, Ashbury JE, Zwingerman N, King WD, Taylor SA, Pang SC. A refined, rapid and reproducible high resolution melt (HRM)-based method suitable for quantification of global LINE-1 repetitive element methylation. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4(1):565. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-565. PubMed DOI PMC

Smith E, Jones ME, Drew PA. Quantitation of DNA methylation by melt curve analysis. BMC Cancer. 2009;9(1):123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-123. PubMed DOI PMC

Malentacchi F, Forni G, Vinci S, Orlando C. Quantitative evaluation of DNA methylation by optimization of a differential-high resolution melt analysis protocol. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(12):e86. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp383. PubMed DOI PMC

Wojdacz TK, Borgbo T, Hansen LL. Primer design versus PCR bias in methylation independent PCR amplifications. Epigenetics. 2009;4(4):231–234. doi: 10.4161/epi.9020. PubMed DOI

Wojdacz TK, Lotte HL. Reversal of PCR bias for improved sensitivity of the DNA methylation melting curve assay. BioTechniques. 2006;41(3):274–278. doi: 10.2144/000112240. PubMed DOI

Hansen LL, Wojdacz TK, Dobrovic A. Methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(12):1903–1908. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.191. PubMed DOI

Wojdacz TK, Hansen LL, Dobrovic A. A new approach to primer design for the control of PCR bias in methylation studies. BMC Res Notes. 2008;1(1):54. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-1-54. PubMed DOI PMC

Herman JG, Graff JR, Myöhänen S, Nelkin BD, Baylin SB. Methylation-Specific PCR: A Novel PCR Assay for Methylation Status of CpG Islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(18):9821–9826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9821. PubMed DOI PMC

Derks S, Lentjes MH, Hellebrekers DM, de Bruïne AP, Herman JG, van Engeland M. Methylation-specific PCR unraveled. Cellular oncology : the official journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology. 2004;26(5–6):291–299. PubMed PMC

Husseiny MI, Kuroda A, Kaye AN, Nair I, Kandeel F, Ferreri K. Development of a Quantitative Methylation-Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction Method for Monitoring Beta Cell Death in Type 1 Diabetes. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047942. PubMed DOI PMC

Akirav EM, Lebastchi J, Galvan EM, Henegariu O, Akirav M, Ablamunits V, et al. Detection of β cell death in diabetes using differentially methylated circulating DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(47):19018–19023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111008108. PubMed DOI PMC

Eads CA, Danenberg KD, Kawakami K, Saltz LB, Blake C, Shibata D, et al. MethyLight: a high-throughput assay to measure DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(8):e32. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.8.e32. PubMed DOI PMC

Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(9):45. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45. PubMed DOI PMC

Šestáková Šárka, Krejčík Zdeněk, Folta Adam, Cerovská Ela, Šálek Cyril, Merkerová Michaela Dostálová, Pecherková Pavla, Ráčil Zdeněk, Mayer Jiří, Cetkovský Petr, Remešová Hana. DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation patterns in acute myeloid leukemia patients with mutations in DNMT3A and IDH1/2 and their combinations. Cancer Biomarkers. 2019;25(1):43–51. doi: 10.3233/CBM-182176. PubMed DOI

Dwight Z, Palais R, Wittwer C. uAnalyze: web-based high-resolution DNA melting analysis with comparison to thermodynamic predictions. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2012;9(6):1805–1811. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2012.112. PubMed DOI

Pfaffl MW. Real-time qPCR amplification efficiency. In: Dorak MT, editor. Real-time PCR. 1. London: Taylor & Francis; 2007. pp. 68–71.

A validation study of potential prognostic DNA methylation biomarkers in patients with acute myeloid leukemia using a custom DNA methylation sequencing panel

DNA Methylation in Solid Tumors: Functions and Methods of Detection