This paper analyses the contemporary public debate about vaccination, and medical knowledge more broadly, in the context of social media. The study is focused on the massive online debate prompted by the Facebook status of the digital celebrity Mark Zuckerberg, who posted a picture of his two-month-old daughter, accompanied by a comment: 'Doctor's visit - time for vaccines!' Carrying out a qualitative analysis on a sample of 650 comments and replies, selected through systematic random sampling from an initial pool of over 10,000 user contributions, and utilising open and axial coding, we empirically inform the theoretical discussion around the concept of the reflexive patient and introduce the notion of multi-layered reflexivity. We argue that the reflexive debate surrounding this primarily medical problem is influenced by both biomedical and social scientific knowledge. Lay actors therefore discuss not only vaccination, but also its political and economic aspects as well as the post-truth information context of the debate. We stress that the reflexivity of social actors related to the post-truth era re-enters and influences the debate more than ever. Furthermore, we suggest that the interconnection of different layers of reflexivity can either reinforce certainty or deepen the ambiguity and uncertainty of reflexive agents.

Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Faculty of Social Studies Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

School of Social Sciences Loughborough University Loughborough UK

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Adams, S.A. (2011) Sourcing the crowd for health services improvement: the reflexive patient and ‘share-your-experience’ websites, Social Science & Medicine, 72, 7, 1069-76.

Beck, U., Bonss, W. and Lau, C. (2003) The theory of reflexive modernization, Theory, Culture & Society, 20, 2, 1-33.

Blume, S. (2006) Anti-vaccination movements and their interpretations, Social Science and Medicine, 62, 3, 628-42.

Boler, M. and Davis, E. (2018) The affective politics of the “post-truth” era: feeling rules and networked subjectivity, Emotion, Space and Society, 27, 75-85.

Broniatowski, D.A., Jamison, A.M., Qi, S., AlKulaib, L., et al. (2018) Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate, American Journal of Public Health, 108, 10, 1378-84.

Brubaker, R. (2017) Forget Fake News. Social Media Is Making Democracy Less Democratic. Available at http://www.zocalopublicsquare.org/2017/11/29/forget-fake-news-social-media-making-democracy-less-democratic/ideas/essay/ (Last accessed 9 December 2018).

Corner, J. (2017) Fake news, post-truth and media-political change, Media, Culture and Society, 39, 7, 1100-7.

d'Ancona, M. (2017) Post-Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press.

de Swaan, A. (1988) In Care of the State. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Dent, M. and Pahor, M. (2015) Patient involvement in Europe - a comparative framework, Journal of Health Organization and Management, 29, 5, 546-55.

Einstein, K.L. and Glick, D.M. (2015) Do I think BLS data are BS? The consequences of conspiracy theories, Political Behavior, 37, 3, 679-701.

Fuller, S. (2018) Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game. London: Anthem Press.

Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hasmanová Marhánková, J. (2014) Postoje rodičů odmítajících povinná očkování svých dětí: případová studie krize důvěry v biomedicínské vědění, Sociologický Časopis, 50, 2, 163-87.

Hine, C. (2011) Internet research and unobtrusive methods, Social Research Update, 61, 1.

Hobson-West, P. (2003) Understanding vaccination resistance: moving beyond risk, Health, Risk & Society, 5, 3, 273-83.

Hobson-West, P. (2007) Trusting blindly can be the biggest risk of all: Organised resistance to childhood vaccination in the UK, Sociology of Health and Illness, 29, 2, 198-215.

Hoffman, S.G. (2018) The responsibilities and obligations of STS in a moment of post-truth demagoguery, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 4, 444-52.

Iyengar, S. and Massey, D.S. (2018) Scientific communication in a post-truth society, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Published Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805868115.

Kata, A. (2012) Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm - An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement, Vaccine, 30, 3778-89.

Kivits, J. (2004) Researching the ’informed patient, Information, Communication & Society, 7, 4, 510-530.

Kivits, J. (2009) Everyday health and the internet: a mediated health perspective on health information seeking, Sociology of Health & Illness, 31, 5, 673-87.

Lash, S. (1994) Reflexivity and its doubles: structure, aesthetics, community. In Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. (eds) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, pp 110-173. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Levinson, P. (2017) Fake News in Real Context. New York: Connected Editions.

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U.K. and Cook, J. (2017) Beyond misinformation: understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 4, 353-69.

Lupton, D. (1997) Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter, Social Science & Medicine, 45, 3, 373-81.

Lupton, D. (2017) Digital Health: Critical and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives. London: Routledge.

Lynch, M. (2017) STS, symmetry and post-truth, Social Studies of Science, 47, 4, 593-99.

Martin, G.P. (2008) ‘Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare, Sociology of Health & Illness, 30, 1, 35-54.

Marwick, A.E. (2014) Networked privacy: how teenagers negotiate context in social media, New Media & Society, 16, 7, 1051-67.

Miah, A. and Rich, E. (2008) The Medicalization of Cyberspace. London: Routledge.

Nettleton, S. and Burrows, R. (2002) Reflexive modernization and the emergence of wired self-help. In Renninger, K.A. and Shumar, W. (eds) Building Virtual Communities: Learning and Change in Cyberspace, pp 249-268. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nettleton, S. and Burrows, R. (2003) E-scaped medicine?, Information, Reflexivity and Health, Critical Social Policy, 23, 2, 165-85.

Newman, J. and Kuhlmann, E. (2007) Consumers enter the political stage? The modernization of health care in Britain and Germany, Journal of European Social Policy, 17, 2, 99-111.

Nichols, T. (2017) The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Oliver, J.E. and Wood, T.J. (2014a) Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States, JAMA Internal Medicine, 174, 5, 817-8.

Oliver, J.E. and Wood, T.J. (2014b) Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style (s) of mass opinion, American Journal of Political Science, 58, 4, 952-66.

Pew Research Centre (2017) Key trends in social and digital news media. Available at http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/10/04/key-trends-in-social-and-digital-news-media/ (Last accessed 9 December 2018).

Poland, G.A. and Jacobson, R.M. (2001) Understanding those who do not understand: a brief review of the anti-vaccine movement, Vaccine, 19, 2440-5.

Prior, L. (2003) Belief, knowledge and expertise: the emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology, Sociology of Health & Illness, 25, 3, 41-57.

Saurette, P. and Gunster, S. (2011) Ears wide shut: Epistemological populism, argutainment and Canadian conservative talk radio, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 44, 1, 195-218.

Sismondo, S. (2017) Post-truth?, Social Studies of Science, 47, 1, 3-6.

Skea, Z.C., Entwistle, V.A., Watt, I. and Russell, E. (2008) ‘Avoiding harm to others’ considerations in relation to parental measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination discussions - an analysis of an online chat forum, Social Science & Medicine, 67, 9, 1382-90.

Song, M. and Abelson, J. (2016) Public engagement and policy entrepreneurship on social media in the time of anti-vaccination movements. In Adria, M. and Mao, Y. (eds) Handbook of Research on Citizen Engagement and Public Participation in the Era of New Media, pp 38-56. IGI Global: Hershey, PA.

Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.

Sunstein, C.R. (2017) #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Townsend, L. and Wallace, C. (2016). Social Media Research: A Guide to Ethics. Available at www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_487729_en.pdf (Last accessed 9 December 2018).

Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., et al. (2017) Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy?, Annals of the International Communication Association, 41, 1, 3-27.

Van Prooijen, J.W. and Douglas, K.M. (2017) Conspiracy theories as part of history: the role of societal crisis situations, Memory Studies, 10, 3, 323-33.

Williams, M.L., Burnap, P. and Sloan, L. (2017) Towards an ethical framework for publishing Twitter data in social research: taking into account users’ views, online context and algorithmic estimation, Sociology, 51, 6, 1149-68.

Ylä-Anttila, T. (2018) Populist knowledge: ‘Post-truth’ repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 5, 4, 356-88.

Ziebland, S. (2004) The importance of being expert: the quest for cancer information on the Internet, Social Science & Medicine, 59, 9, 1783-93.

Recruiting a Hard-to-Reach, Hidden and Vulnerable Population: The Methodological and Practical Pitfalls of Researching Vaccine-Hesitant Parents