There are a limited number of studies focusing on the mechanisms explaining why variable practice gives an advantage in a novel situation and constant practice in performance in trained conditions. We hypothesized that this may be due to the different gaze behavior that is developed under different conditions. Twenty participants, randomly assigned to two different groups, practiced basketball free throws for three consecutive days, performing 100 throws per day. The constant group (n = 10) practiced at a free throw distance (4.57 m) only. The variable practice group (n = 10) randomly performed 20 shots per five throw distances (3.35, 3.96, 4.57, 5.18, and 5.79 m) on each day, also accumulating 100 shots per day. We analyzed the total gaze fixation duration, a number of fixations, and the average fixation duration on a basketball rim in a pretest and posttest at the 4.57 m distance. We computed a linear mixed model with test (pretest-posttest), group (constant-variable), and test × group interaction in order to analyze the total fixation duration and number of fixations. The average fixation duration was analyzed with a repeated measure two-way ANOVA, with practice conditions as a between-participants factor and test type as a within-participants factor. We found that the total fixation duration increased significantly in the posttest, regardless of the practice conditions (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.504). The number of fixations also increased significantly in the posttest (p = 0.037, effect size = 0.246). The average fixation duration increased in both groups; however, insignificantly. We also did not find any significant differences between groups. Our results suggest that variable and constant practice conditions may lead to the development of similar gaze behavior.

Department of Sport Didactics University School of Physical Education in Wrocław 51 612 Wrocław Poland

Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy Opole University of Technology 45 758 Opole Poland

Faculty of Physical Education University School of Physical Education in Wrocław 51 612 Wrocław Poland

Faculty of Sport Studies Masaryk University in Brno 625 00 Brno Czech Republic

Physical Activity Sport and Recreation focus group North West University in Potchefstroom 2520 Potchefstroom South Africa

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Magill R.A., Anderson D.I. Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications. 11th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; New York, NY, USA: 2017.

Schmidt R.A. Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflections and implications for a new theory. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport. 2003;74:366–375. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2003.10609106. PubMed DOI

Thorndike E.L. Educational Psychology. Columbia University Press; New York, NY, USA: 1913.

Van Rossum J.H.A. Schmidt’s schema theory: The empirical base of the variability of practice hypothesis. Hum. Mov. Sci. 1990;9:387–435. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(90)90010-B. DOI

Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. 5th ed. Human Kinetics; Champaign, IL, USA: 2011.

Keetch K.M., Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D., Young D.E. Especial skills: Their emergence with massive amounts of practice. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2005;31:970–978. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.970. PubMed DOI

Breslin G., Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D. Especial skills: Generality and specificity in motor learning. In: Hodges N.J., Williams A.M., editors. Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory and Practice. Routledge; London, UK: New York, NY, USA: 2012. pp. 337–349.

Breslin G., Hodges N.J., Steenson A., Williams A.M. Constant or variable practice: Recreating the especial skill effect. Acta Psychol. 2012;140:154–157. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.04.002. PubMed DOI

Lee T.D., Magill R.A., Weeks D.J. Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. J. Mot. Behav. 1985;17:283–299. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1985.10735350. PubMed DOI

Czyż S.H., Moss S.J. Specificity vs. Generalizability: Emergence of Especial Skills in Classical Archery. Front. Psychol. 2016;7:1178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01178. PubMed DOI PMC

Fay K., Breslin G., Czyz S.H., Pizlo Z. An especial skill in elite wheelchair basketball players. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2013;32:708–718. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.08.005. PubMed DOI

Keetch K.M., Lee T.D., Schmidt R. A Especial skills: Specificity embedded within generality. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2008;30:723–736. doi: 10.1123/jsep.30.6.723. PubMed DOI

Simons J.P., Wilson J.M., Wilson G.J., Theall S. Challenges to Cognitive Bases for an Especial Motor Skill at the Regulation Baseball Pitching Distance. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport. 2009;80:469–479. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2009.10599585. PubMed DOI

Schmidt R.A. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol. Rev. 1975;82:225–260. doi: 10.1037/h0076770. DOI

Lage G.M., Ugrinowitsch H., Apolinário-Souza T., Vieira M.M., Albuquerque M.R., Benda R.N. Repetition and variation in motor practice: A review of neural correlates. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2015;57:132–141. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.012. PubMed DOI

Horn R., Okumura M.S., Alexander M.G., Gardin F.A., Sylvester C.T. Quiet eye duration is responsive to variability of practice and to the axis of target changes. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport. 2012;83:204–211. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599851. PubMed DOI

Klostermann A., Hossner E.-J. The Quiet Eye and Motor Expertise: Explaining the “Efficiency Paradox”. Front. Psychol. 2018;9:104. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00104. PubMed DOI PMC

Shea C.H., Kohl R.M. Composition of Practice: Influence on the Retention of Motor Skills. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport. 1991;62:187–195. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1991.10608709. PubMed DOI

Shea C.H., Kohl R.M. Specificity and Variability of Practice. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport. 1990;61:169–177. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1990.10608671. PubMed DOI

Shoenfelt E.L., Snyder L.A., Maue A.E., McDowell C.P., Woolard C.D. Comparison of Constant and Variable Practice Conditions on Free-Throw Shooting. Percept. Mot. Skills. 2002;94:1113–1123. doi: 10.2466/PMS.94.2.1113-1123. PubMed DOI

Causer J., Janelle C.M., Vickers J.N., Williams A.M. Perceptual expertise: What can be trained. In: Hodges N.J., Williams A.M., editors. Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory and Practice. Routledge; London, UK: New York, NY, USA: 2012. pp. 307–324.

Mann D.T., Williams A.M., Ward P., Janelle C.M. Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: A meta-analysis. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2007;29:457–478. doi: 10.1123/jsep.29.4.457. PubMed DOI

Rienhoff R., Tirp J., Strauß B., Baker J., Schorer J. The ‘Quiet Eye’ and Motor Performance: A Systematic Review Based on Newell’s Constraints-Led Model. Sport. Med. 2016;46:589–603. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0442-4. PubMed DOI

Vickers J.N. Percpetion, Cognition, and Decision Training: The Quiet Eye in the Action. Human Kinetics; Champaign, IL, USA: 2007.

Kredel R., Vater C., Klostermann A., Hossner E.-J. Eye-Tracking Technology and the Dynamics of Natural Gaze Behavior in Sports: A Systematic Review of 40 Years of Research. Front. Psychol. 2017;8:1845. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01845. PubMed DOI PMC

de Oliveira R.F., Oudejans R.R.D., Beek P.J. Late information pick-up is preferred in basketball jump shooting. J. Sports Sci. 2006;24:933–940. doi: 10.1080/02640410500357101. PubMed DOI

de Oliveira R.F., Oudejans R.R.D., Beek P.J. Gaze Behavior in Basketball Shooting. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport. 2008;79:399–404. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2008.10599504. PubMed DOI

Czyż S.H., Breslin G., Kwon O., Mazur M., Kobiałka K., Pizlo Z. Especial skill effect across age and performance level: The nature and degree of generalization. J. Mot. Behav. 2013;45:139–152. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2013.763763. PubMed DOI

Czyż S.H., Kwon O.-S., Marzec J., Styrkowiec P., Breslin G. Visual uncertainty influences the extent of an especial skill. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2015;44:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.08.014. PubMed DOI

Binsch O., Oudejans R.R.D., Bakker F.C., Savelsbergh G.J.P. Unwanted effects in aiming actions: The relationship between gaze behavior and performance in a golf putting task. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2009;10:628–635. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.05.005. DOI

Vickers J.N. Visual control when aiming at a far target. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. 1996;22:342–354. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.342. PubMed DOI

Vickers J.N. Advances in coupling perception and action: The quiet eye as a bidirectional link between gaze, attention, and action. Prog. Brain Res. 2009;174:279–288. PubMed

Dickinson J., Weeks D., Randall B., Goodman D., Weeks D., Randall B., Goodman D. One-trial motor learning. In: Williams A.M., Hodges N.J., editors. Skill Acquisition in Sport. Research, Theory and Practice. Routledge; London, UK: New York, NY, USA: 2004. pp. 63–83.

Causer J., Holmes P.S., Willimas A.M. Quiet Eye Training in a Visuomotor Control Task. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2011;43:1042–1049. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182035de6. PubMed DOI

Harle S.K., Vickers J.N. Training Quiet Eye Improves Accuracy in the Basketball Free Throw. Sport Psychol. 2001;15:289–305. doi: 10.1123/tsp.15.3.289. DOI

Williams A.M., Singer R.N., Frehlich S.G. Quiet Eye Duration, Expertise, and Task Complexity in Near and Far Aiming Tasks. J. Mot. Behav. 2002;34:197–207. doi: 10.1080/00222890209601941. PubMed DOI

Gentile A.M. Skill acquisition: Action, movement, and neuromotor processes. In: Carr J.H., Shepherd R.B., editors. Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy. Aspen; Rockville, MD, USA: 2000. pp. 111–187.

Brady F. Contextual Interference: A Meta-Analytic Study. Percept. Mot. Skills. 2004;99:116–126. doi: 10.2466/PMS.99.5.116-126. PubMed DOI

Zwaan R.A., Etz A., Lucas R.E., Donnellan M.B. Making replication mainstream. Behav. Brain Sci. 2018;41:e120. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001972. PubMed DOI

The Development of Generalized Motor Program in Constant and Variable Practice Conditions