The flavonoid degrading fungus Acremonium sp. DSM 24697 produces two diglycosidases with different specificities
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
31705182
DOI
10.1007/s00253-019-10180-y
PII: 10.1007/s00253-019-10180-y
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Enzyme catalysis, Glycoside hydrolase, Hesperidin, Recombinant protein, Rutin,
- MeSH
- Acremonium enzymology genetics MeSH
- Flavonoids metabolism MeSH
- Fungal Proteins genetics metabolism MeSH
- Phylogeny MeSH
- Glycoside Hydrolases genetics metabolism MeSH
- Molecular Weight MeSH
- Pichia genetics MeSH
- Recombinant Proteins metabolism MeSH
- Sequence Analysis, DNA MeSH
- Substrate Specificity MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Flavonoids MeSH
- Fungal Proteins MeSH
- Glycoside Hydrolases MeSH
- Recombinant Proteins MeSH
AbstractDiglycosidases hydrolyze the heterosidic linkage of diglycoconjugates, releasing the disaccharide and the aglycone. Usually, these enzymes do not hydrolyze or present only low activities towards monoglycosylated compounds. The flavonoid degrading fungus Acremonium sp. DSM 24697 produced two diglycosidases, which were termed 6-O-α-rhamnosyl-β-glucosidase I and II (αRβG I and II) because of their function of releasing the disaccharide rutinose (6-O-α-L-rhamnosyl-β-D-glucose) from the diglycoconjugates hesperidin or rutin. In this work, the genome of Acremonium sp. DSM 24697 was sequenced and assembled with a size of ~ 27 Mb. The genes encoding αRβG I and II were expressed in Pichia pastoris KM71 and the protein products were purified with apparent molecular masses of 42 and 82 kDa, respectively. A phylogenetic analysis showed that αRβG I grouped in glycoside hydrolase family 5, subfamily 23 (GH5), together with other fungal diglycosidases whose substrate specificities had been reported to be different from αRβG I. On the other hand, αRβG II grouped in glycoside hydrolase family 3 (GH3) and thus is the first GH3 member that hydrolyzes the heterosidic linkage of rutinosylated compounds. The substrate scopes of the enzymes were different: αRβG I showed exclusive specificity toward 7-O-β-rutinosyl flavonoids, whereas αRβG II hydrolyzed both 7-O-β-rutinosyl- and 3-O-β-rutinosyl- flavonoids. None of the enzymes displayed activity toward 7-O-β-neohesperidosyl- flavonoids. The recombinant enzymes also exhibited transglycosylation activities, transferring rutinose from hesperidin or rutin onto various alcoholic acceptors. The different substrate scopes of αRβG I and II may be part of an optimized strategy of the original microorganism to utilize different carbon sources.
References provided by Crossref.org
Flavonoids as Aglycones in Retaining Glycosidase-Catalyzed Reactions: Prospects for Green Chemistry