Individual housing of dairy calves is common farm practice, but has negative effects on calf welfare. A compromise between practice and welfare may be housing calves in pairs. We compared learning performances and affective states as assessed in a judgement bias task of individually housed and pair-housed calves. Twenty-two calves from each housing treatment were trained on a spatial Go/No-go task with active trial initiation to discriminate between the location of a teat-bucket signalling either reward (positive location) or non-reward (negative location). We compared the number of trials to learn the operant task (OT) for the trial initiation and to finish the subsequent discrimination task (DT). Ten pair-housed and ten individually housed calves were then tested for their responses to ambiguous stimuli positioned in-between the positive and negative locations. Housing did not affect learning speed (OT: F1,35 = 0.39, P = 0.54; DT: F1,19 = 0.15, P = 0.70), but pair-housed calves responded more positively to ambiguous cues than individually housed calves (χ21 = 6.79, P = 0.009), indicating more positive affective states. This is the first study to demonstrate that pair housing improves the affective aspect of calf welfare when compared to individual housing.

Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources Czech University of Life Sciences Kamýcká 129 165 21 Prague 6 Czech Republic

Department of Ethology Institute of Animal Science Přátelství 815 104 00 Prague Uhřínevěs Prague Czech Republic

Division of Livestock Sciences Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Gregor Mendel Strasse 33 1180 Vienna Austria

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Estevez I, Andersen IL, Nævdal E. Group size, density and social dynamics in farm animals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007;103:185–204. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.025. DOI

Lidfors LM, Moran D, Jung J, Jensen P, Castren H. Behavior at calving and choice of calving place in cattle kept in different environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1994;42:11–28. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)90003-5. DOI

Vitale AF, Tenucci M, Papini M, Lovari S. Social behaviour of the calves of semi-wild Maremma cattle, Bos primigenius taurus. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1986;16:217–231. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(86)90115-2. DOI

Reinhardt, V., Reinhardt, A. & Mutiso, F. M. In 28th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production (1977).

Weary DM, Chua B. Effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf: 1. separation at 6 h, 1 day and 4 days after birth. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000;69:177–188. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00128-3. PubMed DOI

Bolt SL, Boyland NK, Mlynski DT, James R, Croft DP. Pair housing of dairy calves and age at pairing: effects on weaning stress, health, production and social networks. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0166926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166926. PubMed DOI PMC

Staněk S, Zink V, Doležal O, Štolc L. Survey of preweaning dairy calf-rearing practices in Czech dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2014;97:3973–3981. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7325. PubMed DOI

Costa JHC, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Invited review: Effects of group housing of dairy calves on behavior, cognition, performance, and health. J. Dairy Sci. 2016;99:2453–2467. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10144. PubMed DOI

Rushen, J., de Passilé, A. M., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Weary D. M. The Welfare of cattle. 187 (Springer, 2008).

Chua B, Coenen E, van Delen J, Weary DM. Effects of pair versus individual housing on the behavior and performance of dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2002;85:360–364. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74082-4. PubMed DOI

Valníčková B, Stěhulová I, Šárová R, Špinka M. The effect of age at separation from the dam and presence of social companions on play behavior and weight gain in dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2015;98:5545–5556. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9109. PubMed DOI

Tapki I. Effects of individual or combined housing systems on behavioural and growth responses of dairy calves. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A-Anim. Sci. 2007;57:55–60.

Broom DM, Leaver JD. Effects of group-rearing or partial isolation on later social-behavior of calves. Anim Behav. 1978;26:1255–1263. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(78)90116-1. DOI

Jensen MB, Vestergaard KS, Krohn CC, Munksgaard L. Effect of single versus group housing and space allowance on responses of calves during open-field tests. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997;54:109–121. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01183-5. DOI

Meehan CL, Garner JP, Mench JA. Isosexual pair housing improves the welfare of young Amazon parrots. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003;81:73–88. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00238-1. DOI

Glasper ER, DeVries AC. Social structure influences effects of pair-housing on wound healing. Brain Behav. Immun. 2005;19:61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2004.03.002. PubMed DOI

Visser EK, Ellis AD, Van Reenen CG. The effect of two different housing conditions on the welfare of young horses stabled for the first time. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;114:521–533. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.03.003. DOI

Yarnell K, Hall C, Royle C, Walker SL. Domesticated horses differ in their behavioural and physiological responses to isolated and group housing. Physiol. Behav. 2015;143:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.040. PubMed DOI

Baker KC, et al. Benefits of pair housing are consistent across a diverse population of rhesus macaques. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;137:148–156. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.09.010. PubMed DOI PMC

Grigg EK, Nibblett BM, Robinson JQ, Smits JE. Evaluating pair versus solitary housing in kennelled domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) using behaviour and hair cortisol: a pilot study. Vet Rec Open. 2017;4:e000193. doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2016-000193. PubMed DOI PMC

Costa JHC, Meagher RK, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Early pair housing increases solid feed intake and weight gains in dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2015;98:6381–6386. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9395. PubMed DOI

De Paula Vieira A, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Effects of pair versus single housing on performance and behavior of dairy calves before and after weaning from milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2010;93:3079–3085. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2516. PubMed DOI

Gaillard C, Meagher RK, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Social housing improves dairy calves’ performance in two cognitive tests. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090205. PubMed DOI PMC

Meagher RK, et al. Effects of degree and timing of social housing on reversal learning and response to novel objects in dairy calves. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0132828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132828. PubMed DOI PMC

Blanchette I, Richards A. The influence of affect on higher level cognition: a review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cogn Emot. 2009;24:561–595. doi: 10.1080/02699930903132496. DOI

Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN, Lang PJ. Picture media and emotion: effects of a sustained affective context. Psychophysiology. 1996;33:662–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02362.x. PubMed DOI

Roy AK, et al. Attention bias toward threat in pediatric anxiety disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47:1189–1196. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181825ace. PubMed DOI PMC

Wright WF, Bower GH. Mood effects on subjective probability asssessment. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1992;52:276–291. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90039-A. DOI

Mendl M, Burman OHP, Parker RMA, Paul ES. Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;118:161–181. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.023. DOI

Harding EJ, Paul ES, Mendl M. Animal behavior: cognitive bias and affective state. Nature. 2004;427:312. doi: 10.1038/427312a. PubMed DOI

Boleij H, et al. A test to identify judgement bias in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2012;233:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.04.039. PubMed DOI

Mendl M, et al. Dogs showing separation-related behaviour exhibit a ‘pessimistic’ cognitive bias. Curr. Biol. 2010;20:839–840. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.030. PubMed DOI

Hintze S, Roth E, Bachmann I, Würbel H. Toward a choice-based judgment bias task for horses. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2017;20:123–136. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2016.1276834. PubMed DOI

Düpjan S, Ramp C, Kanitz E, Tuchscherer A, Puppe B. A design for studies on cognitive bias in the domestic pig. J Vet Behav. 2013;8:485–489. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2013.05.007. DOI

Deakin A, Browne WJ, Hodge JJ, Paul ES, Mendl M. A screen-peck task for investigating cognitive bias in laying hens. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0158222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158222. PubMed DOI PMC

Baciadonna L, Nawroth C, McElligott AG. Judgement bias in goats (Capra hircus): investigating the effects of human grooming. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2485. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2485. PubMed DOI PMC

Neave HW, Daros RR, Costa JHC, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Pain and pessimism: dairy calves exhibit negative judgement bias following hot-iron disbudding. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080556. PubMed DOI PMC

Daros RR, Costa JHC, von Keyserlingk MAG, Hötzel MJ, Weary DM. Separation from the dam causes negative judgement bias in dairy calves. PLoS One. 2014;9:e98429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098429. PubMed DOI PMC

Lecorps, B., Weary, D. M. & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. Pessimism and fearfulness in dairy calves. Sci Rep8, 10.1038/s41598-41017-17214-41593 (2018). PubMed PMC

Lalot M, Ung D, Péron F, d’Ettorre P, Bovet D. You know what? I’m happy. Cognitive bias is not related to personality but is induced by pair-housing in canaries (Serinus canaria). Behav. Processes. 2017;134:70–77. PubMed

Hintze S, et al. A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task. Sci Rep. 2018;8:5104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23459-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Papini MR. Comparative psychology of surprising nonreward. Brain Behav. Evol. 2003;62:83–95. doi: 10.1159/000072439. PubMed DOI

Roelofs S, et al. Judgement bias in pigs is independent of performance in a spatial holeboard task and conditional discrimination learning. Anim Cogn. 2017;20:739–753. doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1095-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Gygax L. The A to Z of statistics for testing cognitive judgement bias. Anim Behav. 2014;95:59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.06.013. DOI

Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J. 2008;50:346–363. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200810425. PubMed DOI

Holson R, Sackett GP. Effects of isolation rearing on learning by mammals. Psychol Learn Motiv. 1984;18:199–254. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60363-1. DOI

Jones S, et al. Assessing animal affect: an automated and self-initiated judgement bias task based on natural investigative behaviour. Sci Rep. 2018;8:12400. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30571-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Bailoo JD, et al. Effects of cage enrichment on behavior, welfare and outcome variability in female mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018;12:232. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00232. PubMed DOI PMC

Novak J, et al. Effects of stereotypic behaviour and chronic mild stress on judgement bias in laboratory mice. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;174:162–172. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.10.004. DOI

Holm L, Jensen MB, Jeppesen LL. Calves’ motivation for access to two different types of social contact measured by operant conditioning. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;79:175–194. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00137-5. DOI

Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98:310–357. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310. PubMed DOI

Rault JL. Friends with benefits: social support and its relevance for farm animal welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;136:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.002. DOI

Kiyokawa Y, Hiroshima S, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y. Social buffering reduces male rats’ behavioral and corticosterone responses to a conditioned stimulus. Horm Behav. 2014;65:114–118. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.12.005. PubMed DOI

Færevik G, Jensen MB, Bøe KE. Dairy calves social preferences and the significance of a companion animal during separation from the group. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;99:205–221. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.10.012. DOI

Indication of social buffering in disbudded calves

Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition

Negative play contagion in calves