• This record comes from PubMed

Effect of Ni ion release on the cells in contact with NiTi alloys

. 2020 Mar ; 27 (8) : 7934-7942. [epub] 20191231

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
15-16336S Grantová Agentura České Republiky

Links

PubMed 31893362
DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-07506-8
PII: 10.1007/s11356-019-07506-8
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Nickel-titanium alloys have been used in medical applications for several years; however, biocompatibility of the material remains controversial. In the present study, the human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were cultured in contact with the nitinol used in two different heat treatment surface modifications-helium and hydrogen. The amount of Ni ions released from these alloys in contact with HUVEC was measured in media and in the cells by ICP-MS. An increased release of Ni ions was detected in He alloy compared with H2 alloy modification with an elevation with the metal exposition duration (24 h vs. 72 h). The cells contained the Ni ions in both selected alloy modifications with the lower levels in H2 alloys. To evaluate the potential of multiple metal applications, similar values were observed in media and in cell suspension for all surface modification combinations. The model analysis of effect of metal ion release on distant cells in the body showed that the concentration is interestingly similar to concentrations in cells in direct contact with the metal alloy. The cells are able to regulate the concentration of Ni ions within the cell. According to our best knowledge, the study for the first time describes the presence of Ni ions released from nitinol directly in the cells. In the case of the H2 modification, the lowest levels of Ni ions were detected both in medium and in the cells, which likely increases the biocompatibility of the nitinol alloy.

See more in PubMed

J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018 Aug 30;29(9):146 PubMed

Metallomics. 2011 Sep;3(9):934-40 PubMed

Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012 Apr 1;260(1):1-16 PubMed

J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 Apr;19(4):1553-7 PubMed

Biomaterials. 2001 Aug;22(15):2153-61 PubMed

Acta Biomater. 2007 Jul;3(4):573-85 PubMed

Plant Cell Physiol. 2020 Mar 1;61(3):519-535 PubMed

Biomaterials. 1997 Aug;18(16):1115-20 PubMed

J Biomed Mater Res. 1997 Jun 15;35(4):451-7 PubMed

Biometals. 2017 Apr;30(2):163-169 PubMed

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004 May 15;69(2):223-31 PubMed

J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004 Feb 1;68(2):383-91 PubMed

Biomaterials. 2002 Dec;23(23):4549-55 PubMed

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999 Jun;51(6):730-50 PubMed

Eur Radiol. 2004 Feb;14(2):292-301 PubMed

J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003 Dec 15;67(4):1123-30 PubMed

Acta Biomater. 2010 Jun;6(6):2329-34 PubMed

Biomed Mater Eng. 1996;6(3):173-89 PubMed

J Gen Physiol. 2003 Jan;121(1):49-60 PubMed

J Mater Eng Perform. 2011 Jul 1;20(4):816-818 PubMed

Biomaterials. 2005 Sep;26(26):5359-67 PubMed

J Biomed Mater Res. 2000 Nov;52(2):395-403 PubMed

Plant Cell Physiol. 2011 Aug;52(8):1433-42 PubMed

Biomaterials. 2009 Jan;30(2):141-8 PubMed

Plant J. 2007 Jan;49(1):1-15 PubMed

Acta Biomater. 2008 May;4(3):447-67 PubMed

J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58(5):537-44 PubMed

Biomed Mater. 2011 Apr;6(2):025012 PubMed

J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006 Oct;79(1):61-70 PubMed

Biomaterials. 2014 Aug;35(24):6195-205 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...