The effect of dulaglutide on stroke: an exploratory analysis of the REWIND trial
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
31924562
DOI
10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30423-1
PII: S2213-8587(19)30423-1
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists MeSH
- Stroke prevention & control MeSH
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 blood drug therapy physiopathology MeSH
- Diabetic Angiopathies blood drug therapy physiopathology MeSH
- Double-Blind Method MeSH
- Glucagon-Like Peptides analogs & derivatives therapeutic use MeSH
- Glycated Hemoglobin drug effects MeSH
- Hypoglycemic Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments therapeutic use MeSH
- Incretins therapeutic use MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Recombinant Fusion Proteins therapeutic use MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists MeSH
- dulaglutide MeSH Browser
- Glucagon-Like Peptides MeSH
- Glycated Hemoglobin A MeSH
- hemoglobin A1c protein, human MeSH Browser
- Hypoglycemic Agents MeSH
- Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments MeSH
- Incretins MeSH
- Recombinant Fusion Proteins MeSH
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular outcome trials have suggested that glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists might reduce strokes. We analysed the effect of dulaglutide on stroke within the researching cardiovascular events with a weekly incretin in diabetes (REWIND) trial. METHODS: REWIND was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done at 371 sites in 24 countries. Men and women (aged ≥50 years) with established or newly detected type 2 diabetes whose HbA1c was 9·5% or less (with no lower limit) on stable doses of up to two oral glucose-lowering drugs with or without basal insulin therapy were eligible if their body-mass index was at least 23 kg/m2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to weekly subcutaneous injections of either masked dulaglutide 1·5 mg or the same volume of masked placebo (containing the same excipients but without dulaglutide). Randomisation was done by a computer-generated random code with an interactive web response system with stratification by site. Participants, investigators, the trial leadership, and all other personnel were masked to treatment allocation until the trial was completed and the database was locked. During the treatment period, participants in both groups were instructed to inject study drug on the same day at around the same time, each week. Strokes were categorised as fatal or non-fatal, and as either ischaemic, haemorrhagic, or undetermined. Stroke severity was assessed using the modified Rankin scale. Participants were seen at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and then every 3 months for drug dispensing and every 6 months for detailed assessments, until 1200 confirmed primary outcomes accrued. The primary endpoint was the first occurrence of any component of the composite outcome, which comprised non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular or unknown causes. All analyses were done according to an intention-to-treat strategy that included all randomly assigned participants, irrespective of adherence. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01394952. FINDINGS: Between Aug 18, 2011, and Aug 14, 2013, we screened 12 133 patients, of whom 9901 with type 2 diabetes and additional cardiovascular risk factors were randomly assigned to either dulaglutide (n=4949) or an equal volume of placebo (n=4952). During a median follow-up of 5·4 years, cerebrovascular and other cardiovascular outcomes were ascertained and adjudicated. 158 (3·2%) of 4949 participants assigned to dulaglutide and 205 (4·1%) of 4952 participants assigned to placebo had a stroke during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·62-0·94; p=0·010). Dulaglutide reduced ischaemic stroke (0·75, 0·59-0·94, p=0·012) but had no effect on haemorrhagic stroke (1·05, 0·55-1·99; p=0·89). Dulaglutide also reduced the composite of non-fatal stroke or all-cause death (0·88, 0·79-0·98; p=0·017) and disabling stroke (0·74, 0·56-0·99; p=0·042). The degree of disability after stroke did not differ by treatment group. INTERPRETATION: Long-term dulaglutide use might reduce clinically relevant ischaemic stroke in people with type 2 diabetes but does not affect stroke severity. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute Melbourne VIC Australia
Department of Internal Medicine Dresden Technical University Dresden Germany
Department of Internal Medicine Universidad de La Frontera Temuco Chile
Department of Medicine K2 Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Department of Medicine Oregon Health and Science University Portland OR USA
Department of Medicine University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa
Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA USA
Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis IN USA
Endocrinology and Nutrition Department Hospital Clínic i Universitari Barcelona Spain
Estudios Clínicos Latino América Rosario Argentina
Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz São Paulo Brazil
Hungarian Institute of Cardiology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute St Michael's Hospital University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
Medical University of South Carolina Ralph H Johnson VA Medical Center Charleston SC USA
Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center Memphis TN USA
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology Moscow Russia
Population Health Research Institute Hamilton ON Canada
Robert Koch Medical Center Sofia Bulgaria
Taichung Veterans General Hospital Taichung Taiwan
University Center of Health Sciences Universidad de Guadalajara Guadalajara Mexico
References provided by Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01394952