Gynodioecy is typically associated with a smaller perianth size in purely pistillate flowers than in hermaphrodite flowers. However, it is unclear whether this size differentiation is associated with any differences in flower shape between the two sexual groups. A geometric morphometric analysis of the symmetry of tetrameric corolla shapes was used in the study of Euonymus europaeus L., Darwin's classical system of floral sexual differentiation. I investigated whether there are any shape differences between the female and bisexual flowers, with respect to both purely symmetric variation involving coordinated shape changes of the four petals and asymmetry among petals within flowers. The corolla shapes of the female and bisexual flowers and the variability among flowers within each sexual group were very similar in the purely symmetric components of shape variation. However, the female flowers were significantly more asymmetric with respect to both the lateral and transversal asymmetry of their corolla shapes. This is the first study to apply geometric morphometrics in the analysis of morphological patterns in a sexually differentiated gynodioecious plant system. The results showed that subtle shape differences in corolla asymmetry differ between the sexual groups and indicate diverging developmental or selection signals between the sexes.

Department of Botany Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Adams DC, Otárola-Castillo E. geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2013;4:393–399. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12035. DOI

Arnan X, Escolà A, Rodrigo A, Bosch J. Female reproductive success in gynodioecious Thymus vulgaris: pollen versus nutrient limitation and pollinator foraging behaviour. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2014;175:395–408. doi: 10.1111/boj.12173. DOI

Ashman TL. Pollinator selectivity and its implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. Ecology. 2000;81:2577–2591. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081. DOI

Asikainen E, Mutikainen P. Female frequency and relative fitness of females and hermaphrodites in gynodioecious Geranium sylvaticum (Geraniaceae) American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:226–234. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.2.226. PubMed DOI

Asikainen E, Mutikainen P. Preferences of pollinators and herbivores in gynodioecious Geranium sylvaticum. Annals of Botany. 2005;95:879–886. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci094. PubMed DOI PMC

Barrett SCH, Hough J. Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2013;64:67–82. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers308. PubMed DOI

Bell G. On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B. 1985;224:223–265. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1985.0031. DOI

Berger BA, Ricigliano VA, Savriama Y, Lim A, Thompson V, Howarth DG. Geometric morphometrics reveals shifts in flower shape symmetry and size following gene knockdown of Cycloidea and Anthocyanidin synthase. BMC Plant Biology. 2017;17:205. doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-1152-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Bookstein FL. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis. 1997;1:225–243. doi: 10.1016/s1361-8415(97)85012-8. PubMed DOI

Borg I, Groenen P. Modern multidimensional scaling: theory and applications. Springer; New York: 2005.

Chanderbali AS, Berger BA, Howarth DG, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. Evolving ideas on the origin and evolution of flowers: new perspectives in the genomic era. Genetics. 2016;202:1255–1265. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.182964. PubMed DOI PMC

Culbert BM, Forrest JRK. Floral symmetry affects bumblebee approach consistency in artificial flowers. Journal of Pollination Ecology. 2016;18:1–6. doi: 10.26786/1920-7603(2016)10. DOI

Darwin C. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. D. Appleton & Company; New York: 1877.

Delph LF. Flower size dimorphism in plants with unisexual flowers. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH, editors. Floral biology. Chapman & Hall; New York: 1996. pp. 217–240.

Delph LF, Ashman TL. Trait selection in flowering plants: how does sexual selection contribute? Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2006;46:465–472. doi: 10.1093/icb/icj038. PubMed DOI

Delph LF, Lively CM. Pollinator visitation, floral display, and nectar production of the sexual morphs of a gynodioecious shrub. Oikos. 1992;63:161–170. doi: 10.2307/3545374. DOI

Delph LF, Touzet P, Bailey MF. Merging theory and mechanism in studies of gynodioecy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2007;22:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.013. PubMed DOI

Dommée B, Biascamano A, Denelle N, Bompar JL, Thompson JD. Sexual tetramorphism in Thymelaea hirsuta (Thymelaeaceae): morph ratios in open-pollinated progeny. American Journal of Botany. 1995;82:734–740. doi: 10.2307/2445612. DOI

Dufay M, Champelovier P, Käfer J, Henry JP, Mousset S, Marais GAB. An angiosperm-wide analysis of the gynodioecy–dioecy pathway. Annals of Botany. 2014;114:539–548. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu134. PubMed DOI PMC

Eckhart VM. The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae) Evolutionary Ecology. 1991;5:370–384. doi: 10.1007/bf02214154. DOI

Frey FM, Bukoski M. Floral symmetry is associated with flower size and pollen production but not insect visitation rates in Geranium robertianum (Geraniaceae) Plant Species Biology. 2014;29:272–280. doi: 10.1111/1442-1984.12021. DOI

Gómez JM, Bosch J, Perfectti F, Fernández JD, Abdelaziz M, Camacho JPM. Spatial variation in selection on corolla shape in a generalist plant is promoted by the preference patterns of its local pollinators. Proceedings of The Royal Society B. 2008;275:2241–2249. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0512. PubMed DOI PMC

Gómez JM, Perfectti F, Camacho JPM. Natural selection on Erysimum mediohispanicum flower shape: insights into the evolution of zygomorphy. The American Naturalist. 2006;168:531–545. doi: 10.1086/507048. PubMed DOI

Gunz P, Mitteroecker P. Semilandmarks: a method for quantifying curves and surfaces. Hystrix. 2013;24:103–109. doi: 10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6292. DOI

Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 2001;4:1–9.

Idžojtić M. Dendrology. Cones, flowers, fruits and seeds. Academic Press; London: 2019.

Kamath A, Levin LA, Miller JS. Floral size and shape evolution following the transition to gender dimorphism. American Journal of Botany. 2017;104:451–460. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600442. PubMed DOI

Klingenberg CP. Analyzing fluctuating asymmetry with geometric morphometrics: concepts, methods, and applications. Symmetry. 2015;7:843–934. doi: 10.3390/sym7020843. DOI

Klingenberg CP, Barluenga M, Meyer A. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution. 2002;56:1909–1920. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00117.x. PubMed DOI

Lloyd DG, Webb CJ, Primack RB. Sexual strategies in plants II. Data on the temporal regulation of maternal investment. New Phytologist. 1980;86:81–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb00781.x. DOI

Mardia KV, Bookstein FL, Moreton IJ. Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes. Biometrika. 2000;87:285–300. doi: 10.1093/biomet/87.2.285. DOI

Miller JS, Venable DL. Floral morphometrics and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in Lycium (Solanaceae) Evolution. 2003;57:74–86. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00217.x. PubMed DOI

Møller AP, Eriksson M. Pollinator preference for symmetrical flowers and sexual selection in plants. Oikos. 1995;73:15–22. doi: 10.2307/3545720. DOI

Møller AP, Sorci G. Insect preference for symmetrical artificial flowers. Oecologia. 1998;114:37–42. doi: 10.1007/s004420050417. PubMed DOI

Müller H. Die Befruchtung der Blumen durch Insekten und die gegenseitigen Anpassungen beider. Wilhelm Engelmann Verlag; Leipzig: 1873.

Neustupa J. Asymmetry and integration of cellular morphology in Micrasterias compereana. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2017;17:1. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0855-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Niklas KJ. Plant allometry: the scaling of form and process. The University of Chicago Press; Chicago: 1994.

Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5–4https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. [8 November 2019];2019

Perez SI, Bernal V, Gonzales PN. Differences between sliding semi-landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation. Journal of Anatomy. 2006;208:769–784. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00576.x. PubMed DOI PMC

Plack A. Sexual dimorphism in Labiatae. Nature. 1957;180:1218–1219. doi: 10.1038/1801218a0. DOI

Popescu I, Caudullo G, De Rigo D. Euonymus europaeus in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz J, De Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A, editors. European atlas of forest tree species. Publications Office of the EU; Luxembourg: 2016. pp. 92–93.

R Development Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing. https://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/old/3.2.3/ [8 November 2019];2018

Rohlf FJ. The tps series of software. Hystrix Italian Journal of Mammalogy. 2015;26:9–12. doi: 10.4404/hystrix-26.1-11264. DOI

Ruan CJ, Qin P, Han RM. Floral morphology and stigma-anther separation in gynomonoecious-gynodioecious Kosteletzkya virginica (Malvaceae) South African Journal of Botany. 2005;71:367–373. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6299(15)30111-3. DOI

Savriama Y. A step-by-step guide for geometric morphometrics of floral symmetry. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018;9:1433. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01433. PubMed DOI PMC

Savriama Y, Gómez JM, Perfectti F, Klingenberg CP. Geometric morphometrics of corolla shape: dissecting components of symmetric and asymmetric variation in Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicaceae) New Phytologist. 2012;196:945–954. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04312.x. PubMed DOI

Savriama Y, Klingenberg CP. Beyond bilateral symmetry: geometric morphometric methods for any type of symmetry. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2011;11:280. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-280. PubMed DOI PMC

Savriama Y, Neustupa J, Klingenberg CP. Geometric morphometrics of symmetry and allometry in Micrasterias rotata (Zygnematophyceae, Viridiplantae) Nova Hedwigia Beihefte. 2010;136:43–54.

Shaltout KH, El-Keblawy AA. Sex expression in Egyptian Thymelaea hirsuta (Thymelaeaceae) populations. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 1992;181:133–141. doi: 10.1007/bf00937440. DOI

Shykoff JA, Kolokotronis SO, Collin CL, López-Villavicencio M. Effects of male sterility on reproductive traits in gynodioecious plants: a meta-analysis. Oecologia. 2003;135:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-1133-z. PubMed DOI

Simmons MP. Celastraceae. In: Kubitzki K, editor. The families and genera of vascular plants VI. Springer Verlag; Berlin: 2004. pp. 29–64.

Spigler RB, Ashman TL. Gynodioecy to dioecy: are we there yet? Annals of Botany. 2012;109:531–543. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr170. PubMed DOI PMC

Thomas PA, El-Barghathi M, Polwart A. Biological flora of the British Isles: Euonymus europaeus L. Journal of Ecology. 2011;99:345–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01760.x. DOI

Thompson JD, Rolland AG, Prugnolle F. Genetic variation for sexual dimorphism in flower size within and between populations of gynodioecious Thymus vulgaris. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2002;15:362–372. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00407.x. DOI

Tucić B, Budečević S, Manitašević Jovanović S, Vuleta A, Klingenberg CP. Phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental heterogeneity contributes to fluctuating asymmetry in plants: first empirical evidence. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2018;31:197–210. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13207. PubMed DOI

Van Etten ML, Chang SM. Frequency-dependent pollinator discrimination acts against female plants in the gynodioecious Geranium maculatum. Annals of Botany. 2014;114:1769–1778. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu204. PubMed DOI PMC

Webb CJ. Breeding system and seed set in Euonymus europaeus (Celastraceae) Plant Systematics and Evolution. 1979;132:299–303. doi: 10.1007/bf00982391. DOI

Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets DH. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier Academic Press; London: 2012.

Male sterility significantly elevates shape variation and fluctuating asymmetry of zygomorphic corolla in gynodioecious Glechoma hederacea (Lamiaceae)