Female flowers of gynodioecious plants usually have smaller corollas than bisexual flowers. This difference is explained as a developmental consequence of stamen abortion and as a result of stronger selection for larger corolla size in hermaphroditic flowers that solely ensure male function within populations. This study evaluated whether the size difference of zygomorphic corollas in a widely distributed gynodioecious herb Glechoma hederacea is accompanied by variation in shape and bilateral fluctuating asymmetry of sexually differentiated flowers. Geometric morphometric analyses of bilateral symmetry in the shapes of corolla lower lips showed that male-sterile flowers were significantly more plastic and asymmetric, implying that they may be subjected to weaker stabilizing selection for corolla shape in comparison to hermaphrodites. These results illustrated that sexual differentiation may be an important factor contributing to bilateral fluctuating asymmetry in the shape of zygomorphic flowers.

Department of Botany Faculty of Science Charles University Prague 12843 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Adams DC, Otárola-Castillo E. 2013. geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4:393–399.

Andalo C, Bazin A, Shykoff JA. 2000. Is there a genetic basis for fluctuating asymmetry and does it predict fitness in the plant Lotus corniculatus grown in different environmental conditions? International Journal of Plant Sciences 161:213–220. PubMed

Baker HG. 1948. Corolla size in gynodioecious and gynomonoecious species of flowering plants. Proceedings of the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society 5:136–139.

Balant M, Glasnović P, Pečnikar ŽF, Clementi M, Surina B. 2019. In search of an identity for Salvia bertolonii (Lamiaceae). Phytotaxa 413:117–136.

Barišić Klisarić N, Miljković D, Avramov S, Živković U, Tarasjev A. 2016. Developmental instability in German Iris flower as a potential biomonitoring method. Archives of Biological Sciences 68:837–844.

Barišić Klisarić N, Miljković D, Avramov S, Živković U, Tarasjev A. 2019. Radial and bilateral fluctuating asymmetry of Iris pumila flowers as indicators of environmental stress. Symmetry 11:818.

Barrett SC. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 3:274–284. PubMed

Barrett SC, Hough J. 2013. Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 64:67–82. PubMed

Bell G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 224:223–265.

Bookstein FL. 1997. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis 1:225–243. PubMed

Chanderbali AS, Berger BA, Howarth DG, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2016. Evolving ideas on the origin and evolution of flowers: new perspectives in the genomic era. Genetics 202:1255–1265. PubMed PMC

Chrtek J. 2000. Glechoma L. – popenec. In: Slavík B, Chrtek J, Štěpánková J, eds. Květena České republiky VI. Prague: Academia, 634–636.

Culbert BM, Forrest JRK. 2016. Floral symmetry affects bumblebee approach consistency in artificial flowers. Journal of Pollination Ecology 18:1–6.

Darwin C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. New York: D. Appleton & Company.

Delph LF. 1996. Flower size dimorphism in plants with unisexual flowers. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH, eds. Floral biology. New York: Chapman & Hall, 217–240.

Delph LF, Ashman TL. 2006. Trait selection in flowering plants: how does sexual selection contribute? Integrative and Comparative Biology 46:465–472. PubMed

Dufay M, Champelovier P, Käfer J, Henry JP, Mousset S, Marais GA. 2014. An angiosperm-wide analysis of the gynodioecy-dioecy pathway. Annals of Botany 114:539–548. PubMed PMC

Frey FM, Bukoski M. 2014. Floral symmetry is associated with flower size and pollen production but not insect visitation rates in Geranium robertianum (Geraniaceae). Plant Species Biology 29:272–280.

Godin VN. 2014. Pollination and floral ecology of Glechoma hederacea L. (Lamiaceae). Fundamental Research 9:763–766.

Gómez JM, Perfectti F. 2010. Evolution of complex traits: the case of Erysimum corolla shape. International Journal of Plant Sciences 171:987–998.

Gómez JM, Perfectti F, Camacho JP. 2006. Natural selection on Erysimum mediohispanicum flower shape: insights into the evolution of zygomorphy. The American Naturalist 168:531–545. PubMed

Good PI. 2005. Permutation, parametric, and bootstrap tests of hypotheses. New York: Springer.

Graham JH, Özener B. 2016. Fluctuating asymmetry of human populations: a review. Symmetry 8:154.

Graham JH, Raz S, Hel-Or H, Nevo E. 2010. Fluctuating asymmetry: methods, theory and applications. Symmetry 2:466–540.

Gunz P, Mitteroecker P. 2013. Semilandmarks: a method for quantifying curves and surfaces. Hystrix 24:103–109.

Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4:1–9.

Hutchings MJ, Price EAC. 1999. Glechoma hederacea L. (Nepeta glechoma Benth., N. hederacea (L.) Trev.). Journal of Ecology 87:347–364.

Kamath A, Levin RA, Miller JS. 2017. Floral size and shape evolution following the transition to gender dimorphism. American Journal of Botany 104:451–460. PubMed

Klingenberg CP. 2015. Analyzing fluctuating asymmetry with geometric morphometrics: concepts, methods, and applications. Symmetry 7:843–934.

Klingenberg CP, Barluenga M, Meyer A. 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56:1909–1920. PubMed

Klingenberg CP, McIntyre GS. 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 52:1363–1375. PubMed

Møller AP. 1996. Developmental stability of flowers, embryo abortion, and developmental selection in plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 263:53–56.

Møller AP, Shykoff JA. 1999. Morphological developmental stability in plants: patterns and causes. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160:S135–S146. PubMed

Møller AP, Sorci G. 1998. Insect preference for symmetrical artificial flowers. Oecologia 114:37–42. PubMed

Neustupa J. 2020. Gynodioecy in the common spindle tree (Euonymus europaeus L.) involves differences in the asymmetry of corolla shapes between sexually differentiated flowers. PeerJ 8:e8571. PubMed PMC

Perez SI, Bernal V, Gonzalez PN. 2006. Differences between sliding semi-landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation. Journal of Anatomy 208:769–784. PubMed PMC

Plack A. 1957. Sexual dimorphism in Labiatae. Nature 180:1218–1219.

R Core Team . 2020. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Rivkin LR, Case AL, Caruso CM. 2016. Why is gynodioecy a rare but widely distributed sexual system? Lessons from the Lamiaceae. The New Phytologist 211:688–696. PubMed

Rodríguez I, Gumbert A, Hempel de Ibarra N, Kunze J, Giurfa M. 2004. Symmetry is in the eye of the beeholder: innate preference for bilateral symmetry in flower-naïve bumblebees. Die Naturwissenschaften 91:374–377. PubMed

Rohlf FJ. 2015. The Tps series of software. Hystrix 26:9–12.

Sádlo J, Chytrý M, Pyšek P. 2007. Regional species pools of vascular plants in habitats of the Czech Republic. Preslia 79:303–321.

Sandner TM. 2020. Inbreeding and competition, but not abiotic stresses, increase fluctuating asymmetry of Mimulus guttatus flowers. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 130:410–418.

Savriama Y. 2018. A step-by-step guide for geometric morphometrics of floral symmetry. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1433. PubMed PMC

Schaefer K, Lauc T, Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Bookstein FL. 2006. Dental arch asymmetry in an isolated Adriatic community. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 129:132–142. PubMed

Siikamäki P, Lammi A, Mustajärvi K. 2002. No relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and fitness in Lychnis viscaria. Evolutionary Ecology 16:567–577.

Sulborska A, Dmitruk M, Konarska A, Weryszko-Chmielewska E. 2014. Adaptations of Lamium album L. flowers to pollination by Apoidea. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 13:31–43.

Theißen G, Rümpler F. 2018. Evolution of floral organ identity. In: De La Rosa LN, Müller G, eds. Evolutionary developmental biology. New York: Springer, 1–17.

Tucić B, Budečević S, Manitašević Jovanović S, Vuleta A, Klingenberg CP. 2018. Phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental heterogeneity contributes to fluctuating asymmetry in plants: first empirical evidence. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 31:197–210. PubMed

Tucić B, Miljković D. 2010. Fluctuating asymmetry of floral organ traits in natural populations of Iris pumila from contrasting light habitats. Plant Species Biology 25:173–184.

Waldmann P. 1999. The effect of inbreeding and population hybridization on developmental instability in petals and leaves of the rare plant Silene diclinis (Caryophyllaceae). Heredity 83:138–144. PubMed

Waldmann P. 2001. The effect of inbreeding on fluctuating asymmetry in Scabiosa canescens (Dipsacaceae). Evolutionary Ecology 15:117–127.

Widén M. 1992. Sexual reproduction in a clonal, gynodioecious herb Glechoma hederacea. Oikos 63:430–438.

Widén B, Widén M. 1990. Pollen limitation and distance-dependent fecundity in females of the clonal gynodioecious herb Glechoma hederacea (Lamiaceae). Oecologia 83:191–196. PubMed

Widén M, Widén B. 2000. Sex expression in the clonal gynodioecious herb Glechoma hederacea (Lamiaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 77:1689–1698.

Wignall AE, Heiling AM, Cheng K, Herberstein ME. 2006. Flower symmetry preferences in honeybees and their crab spider predators. Ethology 112:510–518.

Zhang B, Claßen-Bockhoff R. 2019. Sex-differential reproduction success and selection on floral traits in gynodioecious Salvia pratensis. BMC Plant Biology 19:375. PubMed PMC

Phylogenetic, ecological and intraindividual variability patterns in grass phytolith shape