• This record comes from PubMed

Prognostic role of preoperative De Ritis ratio in upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy

. 2020 Jun ; 38 (6) : 601.e17-601.e24. [epub] 20200229

Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Validation Study

PURPOSE: To validate the predictive and prognostic role of the De Ritis ratio in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy in a large multi-institutional cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The preoperative De Ritis ratio was assessed in a multi-institutional cohort of 2,492 patients. An altered De Ritis ratio was defined as a ratio >1.35. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of the De Ritis ratio with advanced disease. The association of the De Ritis ratio with survival outcomes was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: An altered De Ritis ratio was observed in 985 (41.5%) patients; it was associated with a more advanced pathological features. In a preoperative model, the De Ritis ratio was an independent predictive factor for the presence of lymph node metastasis and muscle-invasive and nonorgan-confined disease (P < 0.05). Compared to patients with a normal De Ritis ratio, those with an altered De Ritis ratio had worse recurrence free (P <0.0001), cancer specific (P = 0.0003), and overall survival (P = 0.0014) in the Kaplan-Meier analyses. In the multivariable analyses that was adjusted for the effects of standard clinicopathologic features, the De Ritis ratio did not retain its independent prognostic value. CONCLUSIONS: In UTUC, the preoperative De Ritis ratio is associated with adverse clinicopathologic features and independently predicts features of biologically and clinically aggressive UTUC. Therefore, it might be useful to incorporate the De Ritis ratio into prognostic tools in selecting appropriate treatment strategies.

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit University of Montreal Health Centre Montreal Canada

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology Medical University of Hamburg Hamburg Germany

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health 1 M Sechenov 1st Moscow State Medical University Moscow Russia; Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX; Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic; Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran

Department of Urology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX

Department of Urology Vita Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy

Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health 1 M Sechenov 1st Moscow State Medical University Moscow Russia

Sorbonne Université GRC n°5 ONCOTYPE URO AP HP Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière Urology Department PARIS France

References provided by Crossref.org

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...