Metabolic Syndrome Predicts Worse Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Treated With Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma

. 2020 Jun ; 140 () : 91-97. [epub] 20200306

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid32151650
Odkazy

PubMed 32151650
DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2020.02.019
PII: S0090-4295(20)30255-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

OBJECTIVE: To test the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components (high blood pressure, body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30, altered fasting glucose, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high triglycerides) on perioperative outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). METHODS: Within the National Inpatient Sample database (2000-2015) we identified all PN patients. First, temporal trends of MetS were reported. Second, the effect of MetS components was tested in multivariable logistic regression models predicting overall and specific perioperative complications. Third, we tested for dose-response from the concomitant effect of multiple MetS components. All models were weighted and adjusted for clustering, as well as all available patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Of 25,875 patients: (1) 59.3% had high blood pressure, (2) 14.7% had BMI ≥ 30, (3) 21.7% had altered fasting glucose, (4) 20.2% had high triglycerides, and (5) <0.01% had low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. One vs 2 vs 3 vs 4 MetS components were recorded in 34.9% vs 22.9% vs 8.9% vs 2.2% patients. Of all, 11.1% exhibited ≥ 3 components and qualified for MetS. The rates of MetS increased over time (estimated annual percentage changes: +12.0%;P <.001). The 4 tested MetS components (high blood pressure, BMI ≥ 30, altered fasting glucose, and high triglycerides) achieved independent predictor status in multivariable models predicting overall, cardiac, miscellaneous medical, vascular, and respiratory complications, as well as transfusions. Moreover, a statistically significant dose-response was confirmed for the same endpoints. CONCLUSION: MetS and its components consistently and strongly predict perioperative complications after PN. Moreover, the strength of the effect was directly proportional to the number of MetS components exhibited by each individual patient, even if formal MetS diagnosis of ≥ 3 components has not been met.

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology URI Urological Research Institute IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada; Department of Urology European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada; Department of Urology San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital University of Turin Turin Italy

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada; Department of Urology University Hospital Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main Germany

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada; Martini Klinik University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada; Urology Unit ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties Radiological Science and Public Health University of Brescia Italy

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology URI Urological Research Institute IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Departments of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY; Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX; Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prag Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health 1 M Sechenov 1st Moscow State Medical University Moscow Russia

Department of Urology European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy

Department of Urology European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato Oncology University of Milan Milan Italy

Department of Urology IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan Milan Italy

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...