Differential glycaemic control with basal insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus degludec 100 U/mL according to kidney function in type 2 diabetes: A subanalysis from the BRIGHT trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
Sanofi - International
PubMed
32243043
PubMed Central
PMC7383874
DOI
10.1111/dom.14043
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- basal insulin, diabetes complications, insulin analogues, randomized trial, type 2 diabetes,
- MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 2. typu * komplikace farmakoterapie MeSH
- dlouhodobě působící inzulin MeSH
- hypoglykemika škodlivé účinky MeSH
- inzulin glargin škodlivé účinky MeSH
- ledviny MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- regulace glykemie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- dlouhodobě působící inzulin MeSH
- hypoglykemika MeSH
- insulin degludec MeSH Prohlížeč
- inzulin glargin MeSH
AIMS: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) challenges diabetes management and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We examined whether clinical outcomes with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) and insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg-100) are affected by renal function in a prespecified subgroup analysis from the BRIGHT trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BRIGHT (NCT02738151) was a multicentre, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, two-arm, parallel-group, 24-week study in insulin-naïve uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D). Participants were randomized 1:1 to evening Gla-300 (n = 466) or IDeg-100 (n = 463) and stratified based on baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for this analysis. RESULTS: Heterogeneity of treatment effect across renal function subgroups was observed (P = .02), reflecting a greater mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction from baseline to week 24 with Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 in the eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 subgroup (least squares mean difference: -0.43% [95% confidence interval: -0.74% to -0.12%]), while there were no differences in hypoglycaemia incidence or rates over 24 weeks in that subgroup. HbA1c reductions were similar between treatments in the other eGFR subgroups. However, heterogeneity was observed for annualized rates of anytime (24 hours) or nocturnal (00:00-05:59 hours) confirmed hypoglycaemia (≤70 mg/dL [≤3.9 mmol/L]) over 24 weeks showing less hypoglycaemia with Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 in the ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2 . CONCLUSIONS: Kidney function seems to affect the glucose-lowering effects of Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 in insulin-naïve T2D. Greater HbA1c reductions with Gla-300 without increase in hypoglycaemia risk, were observed in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 .
Dallas Diabetes Research Center at Medical City Dallas Texas
Department of Cardiology University Hospital RWTH Aachen Aachen Germany
Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust London UK
Department of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
Diabetes Centre Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Papademetriou V, Lovato L, Doumas M, et al. Chronic kidney disease and intensive glycemic control increase cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Kidney Int. 2015;87(3):649‐659. PubMed
Alsahli M, Gerich JE. Hypoglycemia, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(11):1564‐1571. PubMed
Rabkin R. Diabetic nephropathy. Clin Cornerstone. 2003;5(2):1‐11. PubMed
MacIsaac RJ, Jerums G, Ekinci EI. Effects of glycaemic management on diabetic kidney disease. World J Diabetes. 2017;8(5):172‐186. PubMed PMC
Becker RH, Nowotny I, Teichert L, Bergmann K, Kapitza C. Low within‐ and between‐day variability in exposure to new insulin glargine 300 U/ml. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(3):261‐267. PubMed PMC
Heise T, Hermanski L, Nosek L, Feldman A, Rasmussen S, Haahr H. Insulin degludec: four times lower pharmacodynamic variability than insulin glargine under steady‐state conditions in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14(9):859‐864. PubMed
Porcellati F, Lucidi P, Candeloro P, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and modulation of hepatic glucose production with insulin glargine U300 and glargine U100 at steady state with individualized clinical doses in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(1):85‐92. PubMed
Lucidi P, Porcellati F, Cioli P, et al. Greater suppression of glucagon, lipolysis, and ketogenesis with insulin glargine U300 as compared with glargin U100 in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020;22(1):57–61. PubMed
Riddle MC, Bolli GB, Ziemen M, et al. New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6‐month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 1). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(10):2755‐2762. PubMed
Yki‐Jarvinen H, Bergenstal RM, Bolli GB, et al. Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus insulin glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: the EDITION 2 randomized 12‐month trial including 6‐month extension. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(12):1142‐1149. PubMed PMC
Bolli GB, Riddle MC, Bergenstal RM, et al. New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin‐naive people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose‐lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(4):386‐394. PubMed PMC
Roussel R, Ritzel R, Boelle‐Le Corfec E, Balkau B, Rosenstock J. Clinical perspectives from the BEGIN and EDITION programmes: trial‐level meta‐analyses outcomes with either degludec or glargine 300U/mL vs glargine 100U/mL in T2DM. Diabetes Metab. 2018;44(5):402‐409. PubMed
Kiss I, Arold G, Roepstorff C, Bøttcher S, Kilm S, Haahr H. Insulin degludec: pharmachokinetics in patients with renal impairment. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014;53:175‐183. PubMed PMC
Nordisk Novo. TRESIBA® (insulin degludec) Prescribing Information. U.S Food and Drug Administration. www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/203314s015s016lbl.pdf. 2019. Accessed November 29, 2019.
Rosenstock J, Cheng A, Ritzel R, et al. More similarities than differences testing insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus insulin Degludec 100 units/mL in insulin‐naive type 2 diabetes: the randomized head‐to‐head BRIGHT trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(10):2147‐2154. PubMed
Landgraf W, Owens DR, Frier BM, Zhang M, Bolli GB. Fasting C‐peptide, a biomarker for hypoglycaemia risk in insulin‐naïve people with type 2 diabetes initiating basal insulin glargine 100 U/mL. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(3):315–323. PubMed
Kawaguchi Y, Sawa J, Hamai C, Kumeda Y. Differential effect of hypoalbuminemia on hypoglycemia on type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin glargine 300 U/mL and insulin degludec. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10(4):1535‐1541. PubMed PMC
Pieber TR, Bardtrum L, Isendahl J, Wagner L, Nishimura R. Commentary to "Differential Effect of Hypoalbuminemia on Hypoglycemia on Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated with Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml and Insulin Degludec" by Kawaguchi et al. Diabetes Therapy 2019″. Diabetes Ther. 2020;11(2):561–567. PubMed PMC