Multicentre validation of a EUCAST method for the antifungal susceptibility testing of microconidia-forming dermatophytes
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
32303059
DOI
10.1093/jac/dkaa111
PII: 5821486
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antifungální látky * farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- Arthrodermataceae * MeSH
- fungální léková rezistence MeSH
- mikrobiální testy citlivosti MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antifungální látky * MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Terbinafine resistance is increasingly reported in Trichophyton, rendering susceptibility testing particularly important in non-responding cases. We performed a multicentre evaluation of six EUCAST-based methods. METHODS: Ten laboratories susceptibility tested terbinafine, itraconazole, voriconazole and amorolfine against a blinded panel of 38 terbinafine WT and target gene mutant isolates. E.Def 9.3.1 modifications included: medium with/without addition of chloramphenicol and cycloheximide (CC), incubation at 25°C to 28°C for 5-7 days and three MIC endpoints [visually and spectrophotometrically (90%/50% inhibition)], generating 7829 MICs. Quality control (QC) strains were Aspergillus flavus ATCC 204304 and CNM-CM1813. Eyeball, ECOFFinder (where ECOFF stands for epidemiological cut-off) and derivatization WT upper limits (WT-ULs), very major errors (VMEs; mutants with MICs ≤WT-ULs) and major errors (MEs; WT isolates with MICs >WT-ULs) were determined. RESULTS: MICs fell within the QC ranges for ATCC 204304/CNM-CM1813 for 100%/96% (voriconazole) and 84%/84% (itraconazole), respectively. Terbinafine MICs fell within 0.25-1 mg/L for 96%/92%, suggesting high reproducibility. Across the six methods, the number of terbinafine MEs varied from 2 to 4 (2.6%-5.2%) for Trichophyton rubrum and from 0 to 2 (0%-2.0%) for Trichophyton interdigitale. Modes for WT and mutant populations were at least seven 2-fold dilutions apart in all cases. Excluding one I121M/V237I T. rubrum mutant and two mixed WT/mutant T. interdigitale specimens, the numbers of VMEs were as follows: T. rubrum: CC visual, 1/67 (1.5%); CC spectrophotometric 90% inhibition, 3/59 (5.1%); and CC spectrophotometric 50% inhibition, 1/67 (1.5%); and T. interdigitale: none. Voriconazole and amorolfine MICs were quite uniform, but trailing growth complicated determination of itraconazole visual and spectrophotometric 90% inhibition MIC. CONCLUSIONS: Although none of the laboratories was experienced in dermatophyte testing, error rates were low. We recommend the CC spectrophotometric 50% inhibition method and provide QC ranges and WT-ULs for WT/non-WT classification.
CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias CIBERES Madrid Spain
Department of Clinical Medicine Copenhagen University Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Clinical Microbiology Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
Department of Clinical Microbiology Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Medical Mycology Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute University of Delhi Delhi India
Department of Microbiology Immunology and Transplantation KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
Department of Microbiology University Hospital Olomouc Czech Republic
Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
Malattie Infettive Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord Pesaro Italy
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org