BACKGROUND: Information and communication technology (ICT) use among older adults has been on the rise in recent years. However, the predictors and mechanisms behind older adults' acceptance and use of ICT are not clear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically describe ICT usage among Czech older adults and to evaluate the factors influencing their ICT use and readiness to use digital technology to promote health (eHealth readiness). The primary focus was on psychological factors and the role of persons close to older adults. METHODS: The research utilized cross-sectional survey data from a quota-based sample of Czech older adults (>50 years) and persons close to them further referred to as close persons (N=250 dyads). A structural equation modeling framework was used to evaluate relationships between psychological factors, ICT use, and eHealth readiness. RESULTS: Czech older adults' use of ICT is low with the exception of cell phone usage (cell phone usage by 173/250, 69.2%; other devices used by 50/250, 20.0% of older adults or less). Apart from age (β=-.21; P<.001), eHealth readiness was predicted by ICT use (β=.65; P<.001). eHealth readiness was also indirectly affected by the need for cognitive closure (NFCC): individuals with a high need for closure perceived more barriers to ICT (β=.23; P=.01) and more reported barriers were linked to lower ICT usage (β=-.21; P=.001). The expected positive relationships between eHealth readiness of persons close to older adults and ICT use and eHealth readiness of older adults were not significant, but the total effect of eHealth readiness of persons close to older adults on eHealth readiness of older adults was positive and significant (β=.18; P=.01), indicating some level of influence of persons close to them on older adults' attitudes and behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided the first systematic examination of Czech older adults' ICT usage and eHealth readiness. Novel predictors (NFCC and close persons' variables) were evaluated and yielded actionable results. More research is needed to clarify the role of persons close to older adults.

Faculty of Education University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic

Faculty of Informatics Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Faculty of Social Studies Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Institute for Research on Children Youth and Family Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

United Nations . World Population Ageing 2007. New York: United Nations; 2007.

United Nations . World Population Prospects: 2015 Revision. New York: United Nations; 2015.

Český statistický úřad | ČSÚ. Cesky statisticky urad; 2017. [2020-03-23]. Use of ICT in Households and Individuals - 2017. Article in Czech. Využívání informačních a komunikačních technologií v domácnostech a mezi jednotlivci - 2017 https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/vyuzivani-informacnich-a-komunikacnich-technologii-v-domacnostech-a-mezi-jednotlivci-2017 .

Anderson M, Perrin A. Pew Research Center. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2017. May 17, [2020-03-23]. Tech Adoption Climbs Among Older Adults https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/05/17/tech-adoption-climbs-among-older-adults/

European Commission. Brussels: European Commission; 2010. Mar 3, [2020-03-23]. Communication from the Commission. Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth https://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf .

Chesley N, Johnson BE. Information and communication technology use and social connectedness over the life course. Soc Compass. 2014 Jun 19;8(6):589–602. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12170. DOI

Damodaran L, Gilbertson T, Olphert W, Sandhu J. Digital inclusion - the vision, the challenges and the way forward. Int J Adv Internet Technol. 2015;8(3-4):78–92.

Backonja U, Hall AK, Thielke S. Older adults' current and potential uses of information technologies in a changing world: a theoretical perspective. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2014 Dec;80(1):41–63. doi: 10.1177/0091415015591109. 80/1/41 PubMed DOI PMC

Independent Age . Older People, Technology and Community: The Potential of Technology to Help Older People Renew or Develop Social Contacts and to Actively Engage in Their Communities. London: Independent Age; 2010.

Czaja SJ, Boot WR, Charness N, Rogers WA, Sharit J. Improving social support for older adults through technology: findings from the prism randomized controlled trial. Gerontologist. 2018 May 8;58(3):467–77. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw249. 2996797 PubMed DOI PMC

World Health Organization. 2016. [2020-03-23]. International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI) https://www.who.int/classifications/ichi/en/

Muellmann S, Forberger S, Möllers T, Bröring E, Zeeb H, Pischke CR. Effectiveness of eHealth interventions for the promotion of physical activity in older adults: A systematic review. Prev Med. 2018 Mar;108:93–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.026.S0091-7435(17)30514-5 PubMed DOI

Elavsky S, Knapova L, Klocek A, Smahel D. Mobile health interventions for physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep in adults aged 50 years and older: a systematic literature review. J Aging Phys Act. 2019 Aug 1;27(4):565–93. doi: 10.1123/japa.2017-0410.japa.2017-0410 PubMed DOI

van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Nijland N, van Limburg M, Ossebaard HC, Kelders SM, Eysenbach G, Seydel ER. A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 5;13(4):e111. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1672. v13i4e111 PubMed DOI PMC

Mattila E, Orsama A, Ahtinen A, Hopsu L, Leino T, Korhonen I. Personal health technologies in employee health promotion: usage activity, usefulness, and health-related outcomes in a 1-year randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2013 Jul 29;1(2):e16. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2557. v1i2e16 PubMed DOI PMC

Magsamen-Conrad K, Upadhyaya S, Joa CY, Dowd J. Bridging the Divide: Using UTAUT to predict multigenerational tablet adoption practices. Comput Human Behav. 2015 Sep 1;50:186–96. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.032. PubMed DOI PMC

Vroman KG, Arthanat S, Lysack C. 'Who over 65 is online?' Older adults’ dispositions toward information communication technology. Comp Hum Behav. 2015 Feb;43:156–66. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.018. DOI

Wagner N, Hassanein K, Head M. Computer use by older adults: a multi-disciplinary review. Comput Hum Behav. 2010 Sep;26(5):870–82. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.029. DOI

Olson KE, O'Brien MA, Rogers WA, Charness N. Diffusion of technology: frequency of use for younger and older adults. Ageing Int. 2011 Mar;36(1):123–45. doi: 10.1007/s12126-010-9077-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Selwyn N, Gorard S, Furlong J, Madden L. Older adults' use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing Soc. 2003 Sep 2;23(5):561–82. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X03001302. DOI

Vorrink SN, Antonietti AM, Kort HS, Troosters T, Zanen P, Lammers JJ. Technology use by older adults in the Netherlands and its associations with demographics and health outcomes. Assist Technol. 2017;29(4):188–96. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2016.1219885. PubMed DOI

Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manag Inf Syst Q. 1989 Sep;13(3):319–40. doi: 10.2307/249008. DOI

Macedo IM. Predicting the acceptance and use of information and communication technology by older adults: an empirical examination of the revised UTAUT2. Comput Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;75:935–48. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.013. DOI

Marangunić N, Granić A. Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2015;14(1):81–95. doi: 10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1. DOI

Taylor S, Todd P. Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. Int J Res Mark. 1995 Jul;12(2):137–55. doi: 10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-K. DOI

Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Manag Inf Syst Q. 2003;27(3):425–78. doi: 10.2307/30036540. DOI

Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Psychol Aging. 2006 Jun;21(2):333–52. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333. 2006-07381-012 PubMed DOI PMC

Mitzner T, Savla J, Boot W, Sharit J, Charness N, Czaja S, Rogers W. Technology adoption by older adults: findings from the PRISM Trial. Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):34–44. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny113. 5108474 PubMed DOI PMC

Eastman JK, Iyer R. The elderly's uses and attitudes towards the internet. J Consum Mark. 2004 May;21(3):208–20. doi: 10.1108/07363760410534759. DOI

Chopik WJ, Rikard R, Cotten SR. Individual difference predictors of ICT use in older adulthood: A study of 17 candidate characteristics. Comput Hum Behav. 2017 Nov;76:526–33. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.014. DOI

Cacioppo JT, Petty RE. The need for cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982 Jan;42(1):116–31. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116. DOI

Webster DM, Kruglanski AW. Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67(6):1049–62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049. PubMed DOI

Roets A, Kruglanski A, Kossowska M, Pierro A, Hong Y. The motivated gatekeeper of our minds: new directions in need for closure theory and research. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2015;52:221–83. doi: 10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.001. DOI

Kruglanski AW, Pierro A, Higgins ET, Capozza D. 'On the move' or 'Staying put': locomotion, need for closure, and reactions to organizational change. J Appl Soc Pyschol. 2007 Jun;37(6):1305–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00214.x. DOI

Chernikova M, Kruglanski A, Giovannini D, Vezzali L, Su J. Need for closure and reactions to innovation. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun 23;47(9):473–81. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12451. DOI

Pan S, Jordan-Marsh M. Internet use intention and adoption among Chinese older adults: from the expanded technology acceptance model perspective. Comput Hum Behav. 2010 Sep;26(5):1111–9. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.015. DOI

Ryu M, Kim S, Lee E. Understanding the factors affecting online elderly user’s participation in video UCC services. Comput Hum Behav. 2009 May;25(3):619–32. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.013. DOI

Fausset C, Harley L, Farmer S, Fain B. Older Adults' Perceptions and Use of Technology: A Novel Approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction; UAHCI'13; 21-26 July 2013; Las Vegas. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction: User and Context Diversity; 2013. pp. 51–58. DOI

Kopecky K, Szotkowski R, Kozisek M, Kasackova J. Projekt E-bezpečí. 2018. [2020-03-23]. Old Men on the Net (Research Report). Article in Croatian. Starci na netu (výzkumná zpráva) https://www.e-bezpeci.cz/index.php/ke-stazeni/vyzkumne-zpravy/102-starci-na-netu-2017-2018/file .

Bhalla A, Durham RL, Al-Tabaa N, Yeager C. The development and initial psychometric validation of the eHealth readiness scale. Comput Hum Behav. 2016 Dec;65:460–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.015. DOI

Maneesriwongul W, Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. 2004 Oct;48(2):175–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03185.x.JAN3185 PubMed DOI

Roets A, van Hiel A. Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Pers Individ Dif. 2011 Jan;50(1):90–4. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004. DOI

Sirucek J, Tapal A, Linhartova P. The need for cognition: A study of the psychometric characteristics of the abbreviated Czech version The Scale of the Need for Cognition. Article in Czech. Potřeba poznávání: Studie psychometrických charakteristik zkrácené české verze Škály potřeby poznávání. Czechoslovak Psychol. 2014;58(1):52–61.

R Core Team . The R Project for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017. [2020-03-23]. https://www.r-project.org/

Bollen KA. Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: Wiley; 1989.

Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999 Jan;6(1):1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118. DOI

Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993. pp. 136–62.

MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(2):130–49. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130. DOI

Marsh HW, Hau K, Wen Z. In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Struct Equ Modeling. 2004 Jul;11(3):320–41. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2. DOI

Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull. 1980;88(3):588–606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588. DOI

Calogero RM, Bardi A, Sutton RM. A need basis for values: associations between the need for cognitive closure and value priorities. Pers Individ Dif. 2009 Jan;46(2):154–9. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.019. DOI

Kruglanski AW, Webster DM. Motivated closing of the mind: 'seizing' and 'freezing'. Psychol Rev. 1996 Apr;103(2):263–83. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.263. PubMed DOI

Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology Of Human Development: Experiments By Nature And Design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1979.

Multiple Perspectives on the Adoption of SMART Technologies for Improving Care of Older People: Mixed Methods Study

Feasibility of Real-time Behavior Monitoring Via Mobile Technology in Czech Adults Aged 50 Years and Above: 12-Week Study With Ecological Momentary Assessment

Usage of eHealth/mHealth Services among Young Czech Adults and the Impact of COVID-19: An Explorative Survey