A Randomized Comparison of Plasma Levobupivacaine Concentrations Following Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Subpleural Paravertebral Analgesia in Open Thoracic Surgery
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
MZCZ-DRO-VFN64165
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
PubMed
32397344
PubMed Central
PMC7291256
DOI
10.3390/jcm9051395
PII: jcm9051395
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- epidural analgesia, levobupivacaine, subpleural catheter, thoracotomy, toxicity,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare plasma levobupivacaine concentrations in thoracic epidural and subpleural paravertebral analgesia. METHODS: Forty-four patients indicated for open lung resection had an epidural catheter inserted preoperatively or a subpleural catheter surgically. A bolus of 0.25% levobupivacaine at a dosage of 0.5 mg × kg-1 was given after the thoracotomy closure. Plasma levobupivacaine level at 30 min was the primary outcome. Pharmacokinetic modeling was performed subsequently. Secondary outcomes included the quality of analgesia, complications, and patients'mobility. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations were similar 30 min after application-0.389 mg × L-1 in the epidural and 0.318 mg × L-1 in the subpleural group (p = 0.33) and lower in the subpleural group at 120 min (p = 0.03). The areas under the curve but not maximum concentrations were lower in the subpleural group. The time to reach maximum plasma level was similar in both groups-27.6 vs. 24.2 min. No clinical symptoms of local anesthetic toxicity were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Levobupivacaine systemic concentrations were low in both groups without the symptoms of toxicity. This dosage should be safe for postoperative analgesia after thoracotomy.
Department of Anaesthesia Antrim Area Hospital Antrim BT41 2RL UK
Medical Faculty Masaryk University 625 00 Brno Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Goto T. What is the best pain control after thoracic surgery? J. Thorac. Dis. 2018;10:1335–1338. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.63. PubMed DOI PMC
Kampe S., Wendland M., Welter S., Aigner C., Hachenberg T., Ebmeyer U., Weinreich G. Independent predictors for higher postoperative pain intensity during recovery after open thoracic surgery: A retrospective analysis in 621 patients. Pain Med. 2018;19:1667–1673. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx238. PubMed DOI
Manion S.C., Brennan T.J. Thoracic epidural analgesia and acute pain management. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:181–188. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318220847c. PubMed DOI
Morimoto Y. Regional anesthesia for thoracic surgery. Anaesth. Pain Int. Care. 2015;19:352–356.
Fang B., Wang Z., Huang X. Ultrasound-guided preoperative single-dose erector spinae plane block provides comparable analgesia to thoracic paravertebral block following thoracotomy: A single center randomized controlled double-blind study. Ann. Transl. Med. 2019;7:174. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.03.53. PubMed DOI PMC
Kanazi G.E., Ayoub C.M., Aouad M., Abdallah F., Sfeir P.M., Adham A.F., El-Khatib M.F. Subpleural block is less effective than thoracic epidural analgesia for post-thoracotomy pain: A randomized controlled study. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2012;29:186–191. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834fcef7. PubMed DOI
Kopacz D.J., Helman J.D., Nussbaum C.E., Hsiang J.N., Nora P.C., Allen H.W. A comparison of epidural levobupivacaine 0.5% with or without epinephrine for lumbar spine surgery. Anesth. Analg. 2001;93:755–760. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200109000-00041. PubMed DOI
Perotti L., Cusato M., Ingelmo P., Niebel T.L., Somaini M., Riva F., Tinelli C., de Andres J., Fanelli G., Braschi A., et al. A comparison of differences between the systemic pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine during continuous epidural infusion: A prospective, randomized, multicenter, double–blind controlled trial. Anesth. Analg. 2015;121:348–356. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000775. PubMed DOI PMC
Simon M.J., Veering B.T., Stienstra R., van Kleef J.W., Burm A.G. Effect of age on the clinical profile and systemic absorption and disposition of levobupivacaine after epidural administration. Br. J. Anaesth. 2004;93:512–520. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh241. PubMed DOI
Burlacu C.R., Frizelle H.P., Moriarty D.C., Buggy D.J. Pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine, fentanyl and clonidine after administration in thoracic paravertebral analgesia. Reg. Anesth. Pain Manag. 2007;32:136–145. doi: 10.1097/00115550-200703000-00008. PubMed DOI
Jette D.U., Stilphen M., Ranganathan V.K., Passek S.D., Frost F.S., Jette A.M. Validity of the AM–PAC “6–Clicks” inpatient daily activity and basic mobility short forms. Phys. Ther. 2014;94:379–391. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130199. PubMed DOI
Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX) standard practices for method validation in forensic toxicology. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2013;37:452–474. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkt054. PubMed DOI
Simon M.J., Veering B.T., Stienstra R., van Kleef J.W., Williams S.G., McGuire G.M., Burm A.G. The systemic absorption and disposition of levobupivacaine 0.5% after epidural administration in surgical patients: A stable-isotope study. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:460–470. doi: 10.1097/00003643-200406000-00008. PubMed DOI
Bardsley H., Gristwood R., Baker H., Watson N., Nimmo W. A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1998;46:245–249. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00775.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Gristwood R.W. Cardiac and CNS toxicity of levobupivacaine: Strengths of evidence for advantage over bupivacaine. Drug Saf. 2002;25:153–163. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200225030-00002. PubMed DOI
Stewart J., Kellett N., Castro D. The central nervous system and cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in healthy volunteers. Anesth. Analg. 2003;97:412–416. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000069506.68137.F2. PubMed DOI
Corvetto M.A., Echevarria G.C., de la Fuente N., Mosqueira L., Solari S., Altermatt F.R. Comparison of plasma concentrations of levobupivacaine with and without epinephrine for transversus abdominis plane block. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2012;37:633–637. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31826c330a. PubMed DOI
Miranda P., Corvetto M.A., Altermatt F.R., Araneda A., Echevarria G.C., Cortinez L.I. Levobupivacaine absorption pharmacokinetics with and without epinephrine during TAP block: Analysis of doses based on the associated risk of local anaesthetic toxicity. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2016;72:1221–1227. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2086-1. PubMed DOI
Ishida T., Sakamoto A., Tanaka H., Ide S., Ishida K., Tanaka S., Mori T., Kawamata M. Transversus abdominis plane block with 0.25% levobupivacaine: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical study. J. Anesth. 2015;29:557–561. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-1993-0. PubMed DOI
Yasamura R., Kobayashi Y., Ochiai R. A comparison of plasma levobupivacaine concentrations following transversus abdominis plane block and rectus sheath block. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:544–549. doi: 10.1111/anae.13414. PubMed DOI
Odor P.M., Cavalier A.G., Reynolds N.D., Ang K.S., Parrington S.J., Xu H., Johnston A., Sage F.J. Safety and pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine following fascia iliaca compartment block in elderly patients. Drugs Aging. 2019;36:541–548. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00652-1. PubMed DOI
Crews J.C., Weller R.S., Moss J., James R.L. Levobupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block: A pharmacokinetic and clinical comparison in patients with normal renal function or renal disease. Anesth. Analg. 2002;95:219–223. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200207000-00039. PubMed DOI
Altermatt F., Cortinez L.I., Munoz H. Plasma levels of levobupivacaine after combined posterior lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve blocks. Anesth. Analg. 2006;102:1597. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000215120.90857.55. PubMed DOI