Computed tomography measurements of presumptively normal canine sternal lymph nodes
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
FVL/Crha/ITA2019
Veterinární a Farmaceutická Univerzita Brno
PubMed
32746826
PubMed Central
PMC7398397
DOI
10.1186/s12917-020-02497-y
PII: 10.1186/s12917-020-02497-y
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- anatomy, dog, lymph node size, sternal lymph centre, thorax,
- MeSH
- kontrastní látky MeSH
- lymfatické uzliny diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie veterinární MeSH
- psi anatomie a histologie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- sternum MeSH
- tělesná hmotnost MeSH
- věkové faktory MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- psi anatomie a histologie MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- kontrastní látky MeSH
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of information regarding the CT appearance of sternal lymph nodes in dogs. This retrospective anatomic study was aimed to describe the general appearance of sternal lymph nodes in healthy dogs. RESULTS: Twenty-seven dogs with no abnormality in blood work, urinalysis and CT images were included in the study. Dogs were divided into three weight groups; ≤10 kg, 10.1 to 30 kg and ≥ 30.1 kg. Multi-planar reconstructions of CT images were made to identify sternal lymph nodes. The number, location, size, density and heterogeneity of sternal lymph nodes were recorded. Density and heterogeneity of lymph nodes were measured on pre- and postcontrast images. Except for one dog, sternal lymph nodes were identified in all the dogs. The mean number of sternal lymph nodes per dog was 2.1 (SD 0.6), and the most frequent localisation was at the level of the second sternebra (23 dogs; 85%). There was a positive correlation between the weight and all the dimensions of sternal lymph nodes. A significant negative correlation was found between the age and dorsoventral dimension of the lymph node. Short-to-long axis ratios were not significantly different between the weight groups. None of the measured dimensions nor the ratio values was significantly different between the medium-sized dogs (10.1 to 30 kg) and the large dogs (≥ 30.1 kg). There was a significant difference between precontrast and postcontrast density and heterogeneity values of sternal lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, we recommend using the short-to-long axis ratios for sternal lymph node size evaluation among dogs of different size. Sternal lymph nodes in this study appeared on precontrast examination as heterogeneous, and homogenous on the postcontrast examination.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Bezuidenhout AJ. The Lymphatic System. In: Evans HE, de Lahunta A, editors. Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog. 4. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. pp. 535–62.
Smith K, O’Brien R. Radiographic Characterization of Enlarged Sternal Lymph Nodes in 71 Dogs and 13 Cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2012;48(3):176–81. doi: 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-5750. PubMed DOI
Iwasaki R, Mori T, Ito Y, Kawabe M, Murakmi M, Maruo K. Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Presumptively Normal Canine Sternal Lymph Nodes. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2016;52(6):371–7. doi: 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6520. PubMed DOI
Patsikas MN, Karayannopoulou M, Kaldrymidoy E, Papazoglou LG, Papadopoulou PL, Tzegas SI, et al. The Lymph Drainage of the Neoplastic Mammary Glands in the Bitch: A Lymphographic Study. Anat Histol Embryol. 2006;35(4):228–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.2005.00664.x. PubMed DOI
Iwasaki R, Murakami M, Kawabe M, Heishima K, Sakai H, Mori T. Metastatic diagnosis of canine sternal lymph nodes using computed tomography characteristics: A retrospective cross-sectional study. Vet Comp Oncol. 2018;16(1):140–7. doi: 10.1111/vco.12323. PubMed DOI
Kirberger RM, Avner A. The effect of positioning on the appearance of selected cranial thoracic structures in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2006;47(1):61–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2005.00106.x. PubMed DOI
Thrall DE. Canine and Feline Mediastinum. In: Thrall DE, editor. Textbook of Veterinary Diagnostic Radiology. 7. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2018. pp. 649–69.
Milovancev M, Nemanic S, Bobe G. Computed tomographic assessment of sternal lymph node dimensions and attenuation in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2017;78(3):289–94. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.78.3.289. PubMed DOI
Ackerman N, Madewell BR. Thoracic and Abdominal Radiographic Abnormalities in the Multicentric Form of Lymphosarcoma in Dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1980;176(1):36–40. PubMed
Nyman HT, O’Brien RT. The sonographic evaluation of lymph nodes. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 2007;22(3):128–37. doi: 10.1053/j.ctsap.2007.05.007. PubMed DOI
Burns GO, Scrivani PV, Thompson MS, Erb HN. Relation between Age, Body Weight, and Medial Retropharyngeal Lymph Node Size in Apparently Healthy Dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2008;49(3):277–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2008.00366.x. PubMed DOI
Perlini M, Bugbee A, Secrest S. Computed tomographic appearance of abdominal lymph nodes in healthy cats. J Vet Intern Med. 2018;32(3):1070–6. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15088. PubMed DOI PMC
Skinner OT, Boston SE, Giglio RF, Whitley EM, Colee JC, Porter EG. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for assessment of mandibular and medial retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis in dogs with oral and nasal cancer. Vet Comp Oncol. 2018;16(4):562–70. doi: 10.1111/vco.12415. PubMed DOI
Belz GT, Heath TJ. Pathways of blood flow to and through superficial lymph nodes in the dog. J Anat. 1995;187(Pt 2):413–21. PubMed PMC
Terry JL, Milovancev M, Nemanic S. In vitro evaluation of a novel fiducial marker for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissues in small animals. Am J Vet Res. 2014;75(11):974–81. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.75.11.974. PubMed DOI