Energy balance and metabolic changes in an overwintering wolf spider, Schizocosa stridulans
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
PubMed
32891618
DOI
10.1016/j.jinsphys.2020.104112
PII: S0022-1910(20)30256-0
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Cryoprotectants, Energy stores, Winter activity, Wolf spiders,
- MeSH
- Energy Metabolism * MeSH
- Adaptation, Physiological MeSH
- Glycerol analysis MeSH
- Body Mass Index MeSH
- Inositol analysis MeSH
- Cryoprotective Agents analysis MeSH
- Lipids analysis MeSH
- Cold Temperature adverse effects MeSH
- Spiders growth & development metabolism MeSH
- Predatory Behavior MeSH
- Proteins analysis MeSH
- Seasons MeSH
- Reproduction MeSH
- Carbohydrates analysis MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Glycerol MeSH
- Inositol MeSH
- Cryoprotective Agents MeSH
- Lipids MeSH
- Proteins MeSH
- Carbohydrates MeSH
Winter provides many challenges for terrestrial arthropods, including low temperatures and decreased food availability. Most arthropods are dormant in the winter and resume activity when conditions are favorable, but a select few species remain active during winter. Winter activity is thought to provide a head start on spring growth and reproduction, but few studies have explicitly tested this idea or investigated tradeoffs associated with winter activity. Here, we detail biochemical changes in overwintering winter-active wolf spiders, Schizocosa stridulans, to test the hypothesis that winter activity promotes growth and energy balance. We also quantified levels of putative cryoprotectants throughout winter to test the prediction that winter activity is incompatible with biochemical adaptations for coping with extreme cold. Body mass of juveniles increased 3.5-fold across winter, providing empirical evidence that winter activity promotes growth and therefore advancement of spring reproduction. While spiders maintained protein content throughout most of the winter, lipid content decreased steadily, suggesting either a lack of available prey to maintain lipids, or more likely, an allometric shift in body composition as spiders grew larger. Carbohydrate content showed no clear seasonal trend but also tended to be higher at the beginning of the winter. Finally, we tested the hypothesis that winter activity is incompatible with cryoprotectant accumulation. However, we observed accumulation of glycerol, myo-inositol, and several other cryoprotectants, although levels were lower than those typically observed in overwintering arthropods. Together, our results indicate that winter-active wolf spiders grow during the winter, and while cryoprotectant accumulation was observed in the winter, the modest levels relative to other species could make them susceptible to extreme winter events.
Department of Entomology University of Kentucky Lexington KY USA
Institute of Entomology Biology Centre Czech Academy of Sciences Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org