The reliability of a deep learning model in clinical out-of-distribution MRI data: A multicohort study
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
U01 AG024904
NIA NIH HHS - United States
W81XWH-12-2-0012
Department of Defense - International
U01 AG024904
NIA NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
33007638
DOI
10.1016/j.media.2020.101714
PII: S1361-8415(20)30078-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Clinical application, Deep learning, Domain shift, Neuroimaging,
- MeSH
- Deep Learning * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
- Brain diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Neural Networks, Computer MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
Deep learning (DL) methods have in recent years yielded impressive results in medical imaging, with the potential to function as clinical aid to radiologists. However, DL models in medical imaging are often trained on public research cohorts with images acquired with a single scanner or with strict protocol harmonization, which is not representative of a clinical setting. The aim of this study was to investigate how well a DL model performs in unseen clinical datasets-collected with different scanners, protocols and disease populations-and whether more heterogeneous training data improves generalization. In total, 3117 MRI scans of brains from multiple dementia research cohorts and memory clinics, that had been visually rated by a neuroradiologist according to Scheltens' scale of medial temporal atrophy (MTA), were included in this study. By training multiple versions of a convolutional neural network on different subsets of this data to predict MTA ratings, we assessed the impact of including images from a wider distribution during training had on performance in external memory clinic data. Our results showed that our model generalized well to datasets acquired with similar protocols as the training data, but substantially worse in clinical cohorts with visibly different tissue contrasts in the images. This implies that future DL studies investigating performance in out-of-distribution (OOD) MRI data need to assess multiple external cohorts for reliable results. Further, by including data from a wider range of scanners and protocols the performance improved in OOD data, which suggests that more heterogeneous training data makes the model generalize better. To conclude, this is the most comprehensive study to date investigating the domain shift in deep learning on MRI data, and we advocate rigorous evaluation of DL models on clinical data prior to being certified for deployment.
Day Hospital of Geriatrics Memory Resource and Research Centre ICONE Strasbourg France
Department of Psychiatry Warneford Hospital University of Oxford Oxford UK
Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics University of Perugia Perugia Italy
Institute of Neuroscience Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK
Landspitali University Hospital Reykjavik Iceland
Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland
Neurology Unit Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences University of Brescia Brescia Italy
UMR INSERM 1027 gerontopole CHU University of Toulouse France
References provided by Crossref.org
Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection