Combined Effect of Genotype, Housing System, and Calcium on Performance and Eggshell Quality of Laying Hens
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Switzerland Media electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
NAAR No. QJ 1310002
Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic
PubMed
33207546
PubMed Central
PMC7696842
DOI
10.3390/ani10112120
PII: ani10112120
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Ca, eggshell, enriched cages, genotype, hen performance, littered floor,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The objective of this study was to evaluate hen performance and eggshell quality response to genotype, housing system, and feed calcium (Ca) level. For this purpose, an experiment was conducted on 360 laying hens of ISA Brown, Bovans Brown (commercial hybrids), and Moravia BSL (traditional Czech hybrid). Laying hens were kept in enriched cages and on littered floor and fed similar feed mixtures with different Ca content (3.00% vs. 3.50%). In terms of hen performance, ISA Brown had the highest egg production (84.2%) compared to Moravia BSL (74.3%) and Bovans Brown (71.4%). Regarding eggshell quality, Bovans Brown showed the highest values of all eggshell quality parameters. Increasing feed Ca level augmented egg production (p ≤ 0.001) but had no effect on other performance parameters. Except eggshell thickness, all eggshell quality parameters were affected by the three-way interaction of genotype, housing, and Ca. Bovans Brown, which had the strongest eggshells (5089 g/cm2) when housed on a littered floor system and fed 3.00% Ca, while Moravia BSL housed on a littered floor had the weakest eggshells (4236 g/cm2) at 3.50% Ca. The study pointed out the importance of the interactions between studied factors on performance and eggshell quality compared to an individual factor effect.
See more in PubMed
Hunton P. Research on eggshell structure and quality: An historical overview. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. 2005;7:67–71. doi: 10.1590/S1516-635X2005000200001. DOI
Ketta M., Tůmová E. Eggshell structure, measurements, and quality-affecting factors in laying hens: A review. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2016;61:299–309. doi: 10.17221/46/2015-CJAS. DOI
Singh R., Cheng K.M., Silversides F.G. Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. Poult. Sci. 2009;88:256–264. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00237. PubMed DOI
Ledvinka Z., Tůmová E., Arent E., Holoubek J., Klesalova L. Egg shell quality in some white-egg and brown-egg cross combinations of dominant hens. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2000;45:285–288.
Zita L., Tůmová E., Štolc L. Effects of genotype, age and their interaction on egg quality in brown-egg laying hens. Acta Vet. Brno. 2009;78:85–91. doi: 10.2754/avb200978010085. DOI
Tůmová E., Englmaierová M., Ledvinka Z., Charvátová V. Interaction between housing system and genotype in relation to internal and external egg quality parameters. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2011;56:490–498. doi: 10.17221/3838-CJAS. DOI
Ledvinka Z., Tůmová E., Englmaierová M., Podsedníček M. Egg quality of three laying hen genotypes kept in conventional cages and on litter. Arch. Geflugelkd. 2012;76:38–43.
Zhang L.-C., Ning Z.-H., Xu G.-Y., Hou Z.-C., Yang N. Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in brown-egg dwarf layers. Poult. Sci. 2005;84:1209–1213. doi: 10.1093/ps/84.8.1209. PubMed DOI
Zhao Y., Shepherd T.A., Swanson J.C., Mench J.A., Karcher D.M., Xin H. Comparative evaluation of three egg production systems: Housing characteristics and management practices. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:475–484. doi: 10.3382/ps/peu077. PubMed DOI PMC
Jones D.R., Cox N.A., Guard J., Fedorka-Cray P.J., Buhr R.J., Gast R.K., Abdo Z., Rigsby L.L., Plumblee J.R., Karcher D.M., et al. Microbiological impact of three commercial laying hen housing systems. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:544–551. doi: 10.3382/ps/peu010. PubMed DOI PMC
Karcher D.M., Jones D.R., Abdo Z., Zhao Y., Shepherd T.A., Xin H. Impact of commercial housing systems and nutrient and energy intake on laying hen performance and egg quality parameters. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:485–501. doi: 10.3382/ps/peu078. PubMed DOI PMC
Matthews W.A., Sumner D.A. Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:552–557. doi: 10.3382/ps/peu011. PubMed DOI PMC
Philippe F.-X., Mahmoudi Y., Cinq-Mars D., Lefrançois M., Moula N., Palacios J., Pelletier F., Godbout S. Comparison of egg production, quality and composition in three production systems for laying hens. Livest. Sci. 2020;232:103917. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.103917. DOI
Englmaierová M., Tumova E., Charvátová V., Skrivan M. Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2014;59:345–352. doi: 10.17221/7585-CJAS. DOI
Holt P.S., Davies R.H., Dewulf J., Gast R.K., Huwe J.K., Jones D.R., Waltman D., Willian K.R. The impact of different housing systems on egg safety and quality. Poult. Sci. 2011;90:251–262. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00794. PubMed DOI
Kontecka H., Nowaczewski S., Krystianiak S., Szychowiak M., Kupś K. Effect of housing system on reproductive results in ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus L.) Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2014;59:319–326. doi: 10.17221/7533-CJAS. DOI
Chang L., Zhang R., Fu S., Mu C., Tang Q., Bu Z. Effects of Different Dietary Calcium Levels on the Performance, Egg Quality, and Albumen Transparency of Laying Pigeons. Animals. 2019;9:110. doi: 10.3390/ani9030110. PubMed DOI PMC
Gautron J., Hincke M.T., Nys Y. Composition and bio-mineralization of the eggshell; Proceedings of the 14th European Poultry Conference; Stavanger, Norway. 23–27 June 2014.
Attia Y.A., Al-Harthi M.A., El-Maaty H.M.A. Calcium and Cholecalciferol Levels in Late-Phase Laying Hens: Effects on Productive Traits, Egg Quality, Blood Biochemistry, and Immune Responses. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020;7:389. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00389. PubMed DOI PMC
Roland D.A. Egg Shell Quality III: Calcium and phosphorus requirements of commercial Leghorns. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 1986;42:154–165. doi: 10.1079/WPS19860012. DOI
Keshavarz K., Scott M.L., Blanchard J. The Effect of Solubility and Particle Size of Calcium Sources on Shell Quality and Bone Mineralization. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 1993;2:259–267. doi: 10.1093/japr/2.3.259. DOI
Jiang S., Cui L., Shi C., Ke X., Luo J., Hou J. Effects of dietary energy and calcium levels on performance, egg shell quality and bone metabolism in hens. Vet. J. 2013;198:252–258. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.07.017. PubMed DOI
An S.H., Ki A.B., An B.K. Effects of Dietary Calcium Levels on Productive Performance, Eggshell Quality and Overall Calcium Status in Aged Laying Hens. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;29:1477–1482. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0655. PubMed DOI PMC
Świątkiewicz S., Arczewska-Włosek A., Krawczyk J., Puchała M., Józefiak D. Effects on performance and eggshell quality of particle size of calcium sources in laying hens’ diets with different Ca concentrations. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2015;58:301–307. doi: 10.5194/aab-58-301-2015. DOI
Ketta M., Tůmová E. Eggshell characteristics and cuticle deposition in three laying hen genotypes housed in enriched cages and on litter. Czech. J. Anim. Sci. 2018;63:11–16. doi: 10.17221/75/2017-CJAS. DOI
Safaa H., Serrano M.P., Valencia D.G., Frikha M., Jiménez-Moreno E., Mateos G. Productive Performance and Egg Quality of Brown Egg-Laying Hens in the Late Phase of Production as Influenced by Level and Source of Calcium in the Diet. Poult. Sci. 2008;87:2043–2051. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00110. PubMed DOI
Samiullah S., Omar A.S., Roberts J., Chousalkar K.K. Effect of production system and flock age on eggshell and egg internal quality measurements. Poult. Sci. 2017;96:246–258. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew289. PubMed DOI
Şekeroğlu A., Duman M., Tahtalı Y., Yıldırım A., Eleroğlu H. Effect of cage tier and age on performance, egg quality and stress parameters of laying hens. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2014;44:288. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v44i3.11. DOI
Integra Zabcice (The Story of MORAVIA BSL) [(accessed on 25 September 2020)]; Available online: https://www.integrazabcice.cz/en/product/moravia-bsl/
Horwitz W., AOAC . Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemist; Arlington, VA, USA: 2000.
Mueller C.D., Scott H.M. The Porosity of the Egg-Shell in Relation to Hatchability. Poult. Sci. 1940;19:163–166. doi: 10.3382/ps.0190163. DOI
SAS Institute . The SAS System for Windows. SAS Institute, Inc.; Cary, NC, USA: 2013. Version 9.4.
Tůmova E., Vlčková J., Chodová D. Differences in oviposition and egg quality of various genotypes of laying hens. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2017;62:377–383. doi: 10.17221/22/2017-CJAS. DOI
Isa Poultry (A Global Superstar) [(accessed on 27 October 2020)]; Available online: https://www.isa-poultry.com/en/product/isa-brown/
Integra Zabcice (The Story of Bovans Brown) [(accessed on 27 October 2020)]; Available online: https://www.integrazabcice.cz/en/product/bovans-brown/
Anderson K.E., Harrington T.J.B., Curtis P.A., Jones F.T. Shell Characteristics of Eggs from Historic Strains of Single Comb White Leghorn Chickens and the Relationship of Egg Shape to Shell Strength. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2004;3:17–19. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2004.17.19. DOI
Tůmová E., Vlčková J., Charvátová V., Drábek O., Tejnecký V., Ketta M., Chodová D. Interactions of genotype, housing and dietary calcium in layer performance, eggshell quality and tibia characteristics. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;46:285–293.
Cufadar Y., Olgun O., Yildiz A. The effect of dietary calcium concentration and particle size on performance, eggshell quality, bone mechanical properties and tibia mineral contents in moulted laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2011;52:761–768. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2011.641502. PubMed DOI
Narvaez-Solarte W., Rostagno H.S., Soares P.R., Uribe-Velasquez L.F., Silva M.A. Nutritional requirement of calcium in white laying hens from 46 to 62 Wk of age. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2006;5:181–184. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2006.181.184. DOI
Franco-Jimenez D., Beck M.M. Intestinal Calcium Uptake, Shell Quality and Reproductive Hormones Levels of Three Laying Hen Varieties after Prolonged Egg Production. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2005;4:518–522. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2005.518.522. DOI
Yang H.M., Wang Z.Y., Lu J. Study on the relationship between eggshell colour and egg quality as well as shell ultrastructure in Yangzhou chicken. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009;8:2898–2902.
Altuntaş E., Şekeroğlu A. Effect of egg shape index on mechanical properties of chicken eggs. J. Food Eng. 2008;85:606–612. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.08.022. DOI
Ketta M., Tůmová E. Relationship between eggshell thickness and other eggshell measurements in eggs from litter and cages. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2018;17:234–239. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2017.1344935. DOI
Uhn J., Schutkowski A., Kluge H., Hirche F., Stangl G.I. Free-range farming: A natural alternative to produce vitamin D-enriched eggs. Nutrition. 2014;30:481–484. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2013.10.00. PubMed DOI