Phosphorus removal in a pilot scale free water surface constructed wetland: hydraulic retention time, seasonality and standing stock evaluation
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
33248733
DOI
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128939
PII: S0045-6535(20)33136-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Ecotechnology, Floating macrophyte, Harvesting, Phosphorus recovery, Wastewater,
- MeSH
- Water Pollutants, Chemical * analysis MeSH
- Nitrogen analysis MeSH
- Eichhornia * MeSH
- Phosphorus MeSH
- Wetlands MeSH
- Waste Disposal, Fluid MeSH
- Wastewater MeSH
- Water MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Water Pollutants, Chemical * MeSH
- Nitrogen MeSH
- Phosphorus MeSH
- Waste Water MeSH
- Water MeSH
Constructed wetlands (CWs) are decentralized wastewater treatment systems considered to be green and low cost. They have the potential to effectively remove pollutants and recycle nutrients with plant composting. However, they need large areas to implement them due to the usual high Hydraulic Retention Times (HRT), reaching up to 50 days. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence of HRT (HRT = 3, 7, and 10 days), and seasonality on Total Phosphorus (TP) removal, and standing stock in a pilot scale free water surface CW (FWS CW). Unplanted and planted (Eichhornia crassipes) tanks were evaluated in wet and dry seasons. The FWS CW was set up as a complementary treatment to a secondary level wastewater treatment plant. The system was monitored weekly for ten months, totalizing 29 replicate samplings (n = 58). Planted tanks were harvested every week to keep free space for plant reproduction (∼40%). The mean removal efficiency of TP ranged between 82% and 95% without a significant difference between HRT (pvalue > 0.05). However, when the effects of the sedimentation of the unplanted tanks were disregarded, the lowest HRT (3 days) tank presented the highest standing stock of TP. The wet season presented a significant difference in TP removal results (pvalue < 0.05), associated with higher macrophyte growth rate due to more intense solar irradiation and incorporation of TP by E. crassipes. The results point out advances in P removal and recycling by a low-cost ecological engineering system.
References provided by Crossref.org