With the rise of additive technologies, the characterization of metal powders is increasingly required. There is a need to precisely match the properties of metal powders to a specific machine and to ensure highly consistent production. Therefore, the study aims at a detailed characterization of ten metal powders (Metal powder 316 L, Zn, Sn, Al, Cu, Mn, Fe, Bronze, Ti and Mo powder), for which the particle size distribution, morphology, static and dynamic angle of repose and the effective internal friction angle (AIFE) were determined. The AIFE parameter and flow index were determined from three commonly used rotary shear devices: The computer-controlled Ring Shear Tester RST-01. pc, the Brookfield PFT Powder Flow Tester and the FT4 Powder rheometer. The results showed that the values ​​for the device of one manufacturer did not fully correspond to the values ​​of another one. The flow characteristics of the metal powders were quantified from the particle size distribution data, static angle of repose, and AIFE data. According to the particle size distribution and angle of repose (AOR), 50% of the tested metal powders fell into the free-flowing mode. According to the evaluation of AIFE, 20% of the samples fell into the lower area. Based on the flow indexes calculated from the measurements of the shear devices used, 100% (RST-01.pc), 70% (PFT) and 50% (FT4) of the samples were included in the free-flowing category. When comparing the results, attention should be paid not only to the nature of the material, but also to the methodology and equipment used. A comparison of methodologies revealed similarities in the changing behavior of the different metal powders. A comparison of effective angles of AIFE and static AOR was shown, and a hypothesis of the conversion relation was derived.

Department of Mining Engineering and Safety Faculty of Mining and Geology VSB TU Ostrava 17 listopadu 15 70800 Ostrava Czech Republic

ENET Centre Bulk Solids Centre VSB TU Ostrava 17 listopadu 15 70800 Ostrava Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Bremen S, Meiners W, Diatlov A. Selective laser melting. Laser Tech. J. 2012;9:33–38. doi: 10.1002/latj.201290018. DOI

Alimardani M, Toyserkani E, Huissoon JP, Paul CP. On the delamination and crack formation in a thin wall fabricated using laser solid freeform fabrication process: an experimental-numerical investigation. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2009;47:1160–1168. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2009.06.010. DOI

Basalah A, Shanjani Y, Esmaeili S, Toyserkani E. Characterizations of additive manufactured porous titanium implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2012;100 B:170–179. PubMed

Nandwana P, et al. Powder bed binder jet 3D printing of Inconel 718: densification, microstructural evolution and challenges☆. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2017;21:207–218. doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2016.12.002. DOI

Segura IA, et al. Grain boundary and microstructure engineering of Inconel 690 cladding on stainless-steel 316L using electron-beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019;35:351–367. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.059. DOI

Zhang Y, et al. Additive manufacturing of metallic materials: a review. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2018;27:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11665-017-2747-y. DOI

Fayazfar H, et al. A critical review of powder-based additive manufacturing of ferrous alloys: process parameters, microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater. Des. 2018;144:98–128. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.018. DOI

Barletta, D., Poletto, M. & Santomaso, A. C. Chapter 4. Bulk powder flow characterisation techniques. In Powder Flow (eds Hare, C. et al.) (2019). 10.1039/9781788016100-00064.

Wischeropp TM, Emmelmann C, Brandt M, Pateras A. Measurement of actual powder layer height and packing density in a single layer in selective laser melting. Addit. Manuf. 2019;28:176–183.

Frykholm R, Takeda Y, Andersson BG, Carlstrom R. Solid state sintered 3-D printing component by using inkjet (binder) method. Funtai Oyobi Fummatsu Yakin/J. Jpn. Soc. Powder Powder Metall. 2016;63:421–426. doi: 10.2497/jjspm.63.421. DOI

German RM. Prediction of sintered density for bimodal powder mixtures. Metall. Trans. A. 1992;23:1455–1465. doi: 10.1007/BF02647329. DOI

Dourandish M, Godlinski D, Simchi A. 3D printing of biocompatible PM-materials. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2007;534–536:453–456. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.534-536.453. DOI

Vasilenko A, Glasser BJ, Muzzio FJ. Shear and flow behavior of pharmaceutical blends—method comparison study. Powder Technol. 2011;208:628–636. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2010.12.031. DOI

Prescott JK, Barnum RA. On powder flowability. Pharm. Technol. 2000;24:60–84.

MiDi GDR. On dense granular flows. Eur. Phys. J. E. 2004;14:341–365. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2003-10153-0. PubMed DOI

Pleass C, Jothi S. Influence of powder characteristics and additive manufacturing process parameters on the microstructure and mechanical behaviour of Inconel 625 fabricated by Selective Laser Melting. Addit. Manuf. 2018;24:419–431.

ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Measuring the Angle of Repose of Free-Flowing Mold Powders. C 1444-00 (2000). 10.1520/C1444-00 (2000).

Massaro Sousa L, Ferreira MC. Densification behavior of dry spent coffee ground powders: experimental analysis and predictive methods. Powder Technol. 2019;357:149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.08.069. DOI

Jenike, A. Storage and flow of solids, bulletin no. 123. Utah Eng. Exp. Stn. (1964).

Beakawi Al-Hashemi HM, Baghabra Al-Amoudi OS. A review on the angle of repose of granular materials. Powder Technol. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.02.003. DOI

Riley GS, Mann GR. Effects of particle shape on angles of repose and bulk densities of a granular solid. Mater. Res. Bull. 1972 doi: 10.1016/0025-5408(72)90273-5. DOI

Fraczek J, Złobecki A, Zemanek J. Assessment of angle of repose of granular plant material using computer image analysis. J. Food Eng. 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.11.028. DOI

Rackl M, Grötsch FE. 3D scans, angles of repose and bulk densities of 108 bulk material heaps. Sci. Data. 2018 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.102. PubMed DOI PMC

Nedderman, R. M. Statics and Kinematics of Granular Materials (1992). 10.1017/cbo9780511600043.

Kleinhans MG, Markies H, De Vet SJ, In’t Veld AC, Postema FN. Static and dynamic angles of repose in loose granular materials under reduced gravity. J. Geophys. Res. E Planets. 2011 doi: 10.1029/2011JE003865. DOI

Nakashima H, et al. Determining the angle of repose of sand under low-gravity conditions using discrete element method. J. Terramech. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.jterra.2010.09.002. DOI

Schwedes J. Review on testers for measuring flow properties of bulk solids. Granul. Matter. 2003;5:1–43. doi: 10.1007/s10035-002-0124-4. DOI

Schulze, D., Schwedes, J. & Carson, J. W. Powders and Bulk Solids: Behavior, Characterization, Storage and Flow (2008). 10.1007/978-3-540-73768-1.

Rhodes, M. Introduction to Particle Technology: Second Edition. Introduction to Particle Technology: Second Edition (Wiley, Chicester, 2008). 10.1002/9780470727102.

Carson JW, Wilms H. Development of an international standard for shear testing. Powder Technol. 2006;167:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2006.04.005. DOI

ASTM International. D6773-02: Standard Test Method for Bulk Solids Using Schulze Ring Shear Tester 1. Annu. B. ASTM Stand. 1–26. 10.1520/D6682-08 (2010).

Leturia M, Benali M, Lagarde S, Ronga I, Saleh K. Characterization of flow properties of cohesive powders: a comparative study of traditional and new testing methods. Powder Technol. 2014;253:406–423. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.11.045. DOI

Strondl A, Lyckfeldt O, Brodin H, Ackelid U. Characterization and control of powder properties for additive manufacturing. JOM. 2015;67:549–554. doi: 10.1007/s11837-015-1304-0. DOI

Søgaard SV, Pedersen T, Allesø M, Garnaes J, Rantanen J. Evaluation of ring shear testing as a characterization method for powder flow in small-scale powder processing equipment. Int. J. Pharm. 2014;475:315–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.08.060. PubMed DOI

Clayton J, Millington-Smith D, Armstrong B. The application of powder rheology in additive manufacturing. JOM. 2015;67:544–548. doi: 10.1007/s11837-015-1293-z. DOI

Schulze D. Round robin test on ring shear testers. Adv. Powder Technol. 2011;22:197–202. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2010.10.015. DOI

Shi H, et al. Effect of particle size and cohesion on powder yielding and flow. KONA Powder Part. J. 2018;2018:226–250. doi: 10.14356/kona.2018014. DOI

Koynov S, Glasser B, Muzzio F. Comparison of three rotational shear cell testers: powder flowability and bulk density. Powder Technol. 2015;283:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.04.027. DOI

Salehi H, Barletta D, Poletto M. A comparison between powder flow property testers. Particuology. 2017;32:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.partic.2016.08.003. DOI

Gelnar, D., Zegzulka, J., Soos, L. & J. D. Validation device and method of static and dynamic angle of repose measurement. (2013).

Samantha SC, et al. Drying by spray drying in the food industry: Micro-encapsulation, process parameters and main carriers used. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2015;9:462–470. doi: 10.5897/AJFS2015.1279. DOI

USP. U. S. Pharmacopoeia National Formulary. In United States Pharmacopeial, 2011 (2012).

Jezerská, L., Zádrapa, F., Žurovec, D. & Zegzulka, J. Avalanching and aeration regions for glidants. In NANOCON 2017—Conference Proceedings, 9th International Conference on Nanomaterials—Research and Application vols 2017-October 781–786 (2018).

Tan JH, Wong WLE, Dalgarno KW. An overview of powder granulometry on feedstock and part performance in the selective laser melting process. Addit. Manuf. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.011. DOI

Zegzulka J, et al. Internal friction angle of metal powders. Metals (Basel) 2018;8:255. doi: 10.3390/met8040255. DOI

Jenike A, Johanson J. Storage and flow of solids. Powder Technol. 1975;13:156. doi: 10.1016/0032-5910(75)87020-3. DOI

Mihlbachler K, Kollmann T, Seidel-Morgenstern A, Tomas J, Guiochon G. Measurement of the degree of internal friction of two native silica packing materials. J. Chromatogr. A. 1998;818:155–168. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00546-9. DOI

Brookfield Engineering Laboratories Inc. Brookfield Powder Flow Tester: Operating Instructions, vol. 8139 (2014).

Berry RJ, Bradley MSA, McGregor RG. Brookfield powder flow tester—results of round robin tests with CRM-116 limestone powder. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process Mech. Eng. 2015;229:215–230. doi: 10.1177/0954408914525387. DOI

Freeman R. Measuring the flow properties of consolidated, conditioned and aerated powders—a comparative study using a powder rheometer and a rotational shear cell. Powder Technol. 2007;174:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2006.10.016. DOI

Engeli R, Etter T, Hövel S, Wegener K. Processability of different IN738LC powder batches by selective laser melting. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.09.046. DOI

Geldart D, Abdullah EC, Hassanpour A, Nwoke LC, Wouters I. Characterization of powder flowability using measurement of angle of repose. China Particuol. 2006 doi: 10.1016/s1672-2515(07)60247-4. DOI

Farley R, Valentin FHH. Effect of particle size upon the strength of powders. Powder Technol. 1968 doi: 10.1016/0032-5910(68)80017-8. DOI

Krantz M, Zhang H, Zhu J. Characterization of powder flow: static and dynamic testing. Powder Technol. 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2009.05.001. DOI

Macho O, et al. Analysis of static angle of repose with respect to powder material properties. Acta Polytech. 2020 doi: 10.14311/AP.2020.60.0073. DOI

3D printed laboratory equipment to measure bulk materials in extreme conditions

Systematic Study of the Effects of High Shear Granulation Parameters on Process Yield, Granule Size, and Shape by Dynamic Image Analysis

Wood pellets transport with vibrating conveyor: experimental for DEM simulations analysis