Traditional 3- to 5-Minute Interset Rest Periods May Not Be Necessary When Performing Fewer Repetitions Per Set: Using Clean Pulls as an Example
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
33298711
DOI
10.1519/jsc.0000000000003908
PII: 00124278-202211000-00005
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- cvičení MeSH
- kosterní svaly MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- odpočinek MeSH
- odporový trénink * MeSH
- svalová síla MeSH
- únava MeSH
- vzpírání MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Jukic, I and Tufano, JJ. Traditional 3- to 5-minute interset rest periods may not be necessary when performing fewer repetitions per set: Using clean pulls as an example. J Strength Cond Res 36(11): 3015-3022, 2022-Three to 5 minutes of interset rest is often recommended for power-based exercises, but those recommendations are largely based on performing many repetitions per set, which can induce fatigue and require such lengthy rest periods. If the number of repetitions per set is reduced before fatigue ensues, interset rest periods may also be reduced without sacrificing performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of this notion on barbell velocity and power output over multiple sets of clean pulls using different loads in strength-trained men. Fifteen strength-trained men performed 3 extended sets of 6 clean pulls using 80% (EXT80), 100% (EXT100), and 120% (EXT120) of power clean 1 repetition maximum with 180 seconds of interset rest and 9 short sets of 2 using 80% (SHT80), 100% (SHT100), and 120% (SHT120) with 45 seconds of interset rest. Peak velocity was greater during short set protocol than extended set protocol (80%: 1.74 ± 0.16 vs. 1.68 ± 0.15 m/s; 100%: 1.47 ± 0.15 vs. 1.41 ± 0.12 m/s; 120%: 1.21 ± 0.13 vs. 1.16 ± 0.15 m/s; p < 0.05). Furthermore, peak power was greater during SHT100 (1874.6 ± 267.5 vs. 1732.3 ± 250.4 W; p < 0.05) and SHT120 (1777.8 ± 226.1 vs. 1,650.4 ± 249.1 W; p < 0.05) than EXT100 and EXT120, respectively. Therefore, reducing the number of repetitions per set may allow for interset rest periods to also be reduced while better maintaining performance. However, the extent to which rest periods can be shortened warrants further investigation as total rest time was equal in this study.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Abdessemed D, Duche P, Hautier C, Poumarat G, Bedu M. Effect of recovery duration on muscular power and blood lactate during the bench press exercise. Int J Sports Med 20: 368–373, 1999.
Baker DG, Newton RU. Change in power output across a high-repetition set of bench throws and jump squats in highly trained athletes. J Strength Cond Res 21: 1007–11, 2007.
Cohen J. The concepts of power analysis. In: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge, 1998. pp. 1–17.
de Salles BF, Simao R, Miranda F, et al. Rest interval between sets in strength training. Sports Med 39: 765–777, 2009.
Denton J, Cronin JB. Kinematic, kinetic, and blood lactate profiles of continuous and intraset rest loading schemes. J Strength Cond Res 20: 528–534, 2006.
Garhammer J. Power clean: Kinesiological evaluation. Strength Cond J 6: 40, 1984.
Garhammer J. Biomechanical profiles of Olympic weightlifters. Int J Sport Biomech 1: 122–130, 1985.
Haff G, Whitley A, Mccoy LB, et al. Effects of different set configurations on barbell velocity and displacement during a clean pull. J Strength Cond Res 17: 95–103, 2003.
Hardee JP, Lawrence MM, Utter AC, et al. Effect of inter-repetition rest on ratings of perceived exertion during multiple sets of the power clean. Eur J Appl Physiol 112: 3141–3147, 2012.
Hardee JP, Triplett NT, Utter AC, Zwetsloot KA, Mcbride JM. Effect of interrepetition rest on power output in the power clean. J Strength Cond Res 26: 883–889, 2012.
Harris NK, Cronin J, Taylor KL, Boris J, Sheppard J. Understanding position transducer technology for strength and conditioning practitioners. Strength Cond J 32: 66–79, 2010.
Izquierdo M, González-Badillo J, Häkkinen K, et al. Effect of loading on unintentional lifting velocity declines during single sets of repetitions to failure during upper and lower extremity muscle actions. Int J Sports Med 27: 718–724, 2006.
Joy J, Oliver J, McCleary S, Lowery R, Wilson J. Power output and electromyography activity of the back squat exercise with cluster sets. J Sports Sci 1: 37–45, 2013.
Jukic I, Tufano JJ. Rest redistribution functions as a free and ad-hoc equivalent to commonly used velocity-based training thresholds during clean pulls at different loads. J Hum Kinet 68: 5–16, 2019.
Jukic I, Tufano JJ. Shorter but more frequent rest periods: No effect on velocity and power compared to traditional sets not performed to failure. J Hum Kinet 66: 257–268, 2019.
Moreno SD, Brown LE, Coburn JW, Judelson DA. Effect of cluster sets on plyometric jump power. J Strength Cond Res 28: 2424–2428, 2014.
Oliver JM, Kreutzer A, Jenke S, et al. Acute response to cluster sets in trained and untrained men. Eur J Appl Physiol 115: 2383–2393, 2015.
Oliver JM, Kreutzer A, Jenke SC, et al. Velocity drives greater power observed during back squat using cluster sets. J Strength Cond Res 30: 235–243, 2016.
Orange ST, Metcalfe JW, Marshall P, et al. Test-retest reliability of a commercial linear position transducer (GymAware PowerTool) to measure velocity and power in the back squat and bench press. J Strength Cond Res 34: 728–737, 2020.
Qaisar SM, Fesquet L, Renaudin M. Adaptive rate sampling and filtering based on level crossing sampling. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2009: 971656, 2009.
Suchomel TJ, Comfort P, Lake JP. Enhancing the force-velocity profile of athletes using weightlifting derivatives. Strength Cond J 39: 10–20, 2017.
Tufano JJ, Brown LE, Haff GG. Theoretical and practical aspects of different cluster set structures: A systematic review. J Strength Cond Res 31: 848–867, 2017.
Tufano JJ, Conlon JA, Nimphius S, et al. Effects of cluster sets and rest-redistribution on mechanical responses to back squats in trained men. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 58: 35, 2017.
Tufano JJ, Halaj M, Kampmiller T, Novosad A, Buzgo G. Cluster sets vs. traditional sets: Levelling out the playing field using a power-based threshold. PLoS One 13: e0208035, 2018.
Tufano JJ, Omcirk D, Malecek J, et al. Traditional sets vs rest-redistribution: A laboratory-controlled study of a specific cluster set configuration at fast and slow velocities. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 45: 421–430, 2020
Winchester JB, Erickson TM, Blaak JB, McBride JM. Changes in bar-path kinematics and kinetics after power-clean training. J Strength Cond Res 19: 177–183, 2005.