Shockwave Lithotripsy vs Rotational Atherectomy: Mechanistic Differences From Optical Coherence Tomography
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Case Reports, Journal Article
PubMed
33414357
DOI
10.25270/jic/20.00112
PII: JIC20210107-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Shockwave lithotripsy, coronary calcification, optical coherence tomography, rotational atherectomy,
- MeSH
- Atherectomy, Coronary * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lithotripsy * MeSH
- Coronary Artery Disease * diagnosis surgery MeSH
- Tomography, Optical Coherence MeSH
- Vascular Calcification * diagnostic imaging surgery MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Case Reports MeSH
Management of calcified coronary lesions remains challenging, with frequent stent underexpansion and suboptimal results, which lead to early and late stent failure. Appropriate lesion preparation and optimal stent expansion are the keys to prevent stent failure. We present an unusual case of extensive sever right coronary artery calcified stenosis, in which both rotational atherectomy (RA) and non-compliant balloons failed to dilate the lesion and finally the Shockwave lithotripsy balloon offered optimal lesion dilation and successful stent deployment. Furthermore, optical coherence tomography provided mechanistic insight into the differential effect of Shockwave balloon versus RA for extensively calcified lesions.
References provided by Crossref.org