Shockwave Lithotripsy vs Rotational Atherectomy: Mechanistic Differences From Optical Coherence Tomography
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu kazuistiky, časopisecké články
PubMed
33414357
DOI
10.25270/jic/20.00112
PII: JIC20210107-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Shockwave lithotripsy, coronary calcification, optical coherence tomography, rotational atherectomy,
- MeSH
- koronární aterektomie * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- litotripse * MeSH
- nemoci koronárních tepen * diagnóza chirurgie MeSH
- optická koherentní tomografie MeSH
- vaskulární kalcifikace * diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- kazuistiky MeSH
Management of calcified coronary lesions remains challenging, with frequent stent underexpansion and suboptimal results, which lead to early and late stent failure. Appropriate lesion preparation and optimal stent expansion are the keys to prevent stent failure. We present an unusual case of extensive sever right coronary artery calcified stenosis, in which both rotational atherectomy (RA) and non-compliant balloons failed to dilate the lesion and finally the Shockwave lithotripsy balloon offered optimal lesion dilation and successful stent deployment. Furthermore, optical coherence tomography provided mechanistic insight into the differential effect of Shockwave balloon versus RA for extensively calcified lesions.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org