Metabolic syndrome predicts worse perioperative outcomes in patients treated with radical prostatectomy for non-metastatic prostate cancer

. 2021 Jun ; 37 () : 101519. [epub] 20210103

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid33429324
Odkazy

PubMed 33429324
DOI 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.12.013
PII: S0960-7404(20)30469-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

OBJECTIVES: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components (high blood pressure, BMI≥30, altered fasting glucose, low HDL cholesterol and high triglycerides) may undermine early perioperative outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). We tested this hypothesis. MATERIALS & METHODS: Within the National Inpatient Sample database (2008-2015) we identified RP patients. The effect of MetS was tested in four separate univariable analyses, as well as in multivariable regression models predicting: 1) overall complications, 2) length of stay, 3) total hospital charges and 4) non-home based discharge. All models were weighted and adjusted for clustering, as well as all available patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Of 91,618 patients: 1) 50.2% had high blood pressure, 2) 8.0% had BMI≥30, 3) 13.0% had altered fasting glucose, 4) 22.8% had high triglycerides and 5) 0.03% had low HDL cholesterol. Respectively, one vs. two vs. three vs. four MetS components were recorded in 36.2% vs. 19.0% vs. 5.5% vs. 0.8% patients. Of all patients, 6.3% exhibited ≥3 components and qualified for MetS diagnosis. The rates of MetS increased over time (EAPC:+9.8%; p < 0.001). All four tested MetS components (high blood pressure, BMI≥30, altered fasting glucose and high triglycerides) achieved independent predictor status in all four examined endpoints. Moreover, a highly statistically significant dose-response was also confirmed for all four tested endpoints. CONCLUSION: MetS and its components consistently and strongly predict early adverse outcomes after RP. Moreover, the strength of the effect was directly proportional to the number of MetS components exhibited by each individual patient, even if formal MetS diagnosis of ≥3 components has not been met.

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology URI Urological Research Institute IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada; Department of Urology European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada; Department of Urology San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital University of Turin Turin Italy

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada; Department of Urology University Hospital Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main Germany

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada; Martini Klinik University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada; Urology Unit ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties Radiological Science and Public Health University of Brescia Italy

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology URI Urological Research Institute IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA; Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA; Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prag Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health 1 M Sechenov 1st Moscow State Medical University Moscow Russia

Department of Urology European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy

Department of Urology European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato Oncology University of Milan Milan Italy

Department of Urology IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan Milan Italy

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...