• This record comes from PubMed

Exemplar scoring identifies genetically separable phenotypes of lithium responsive bipolar disorder

. 2021 Jan 11 ; 11 (1) : 36. [epub] 20210111

Language English Country United States Media electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
166098 Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Instituts de Recherche en Santé du Canada) - International
166098 Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Instituts de Recherche en Santé du Canada) - International
231397 Canada Research Chairs (Chaires de recherche du Canada) - International

Links

PubMed 33431852
PubMed Central PMC7801503
DOI 10.1038/s41398-020-01148-y
PII: 10.1038/s41398-020-01148-y
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Predicting lithium response (LiR) in bipolar disorder (BD) may inform treatment planning, but phenotypic heterogeneity complicates discovery of genomic markers. We hypothesized that patients with "exemplary phenotypes"-those whose clinical features are reliably associated with LiR and non-response (LiNR)-are more genetically separable than those with less exemplary phenotypes. Using clinical data collected from people with BD (n = 1266 across 7 centers; 34.7% responders), we computed a "clinical exemplar score," which measures the degree to which a subject's clinical phenotype is reliably predictive of LiR/LiNR. For patients whose genotypes were available (n = 321), we evaluated whether a subgroup of responders/non-responders with the top 25% of clinical exemplar scores (the "best clinical exemplars") were more accurately classified based on genetic data, compared to a subgroup with the lowest 25% of clinical exemplar scores (the "poor clinical exemplars"). On average, the best clinical exemplars of LiR had a later illness onset, completely episodic clinical course, absence of rapid cycling and psychosis, and few psychiatric comorbidities. The best clinical exemplars of LiR and LiNR were genetically separable with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 (IQR [0.83, 0.98]), compared to 0.66 [0.61, 0.80] (p = 0.0032) among poor clinical exemplars. Variants in the Alzheimer's amyloid-secretase pathway, along with G-protein-coupled receptor, muscarinic acetylcholine, and histamine H1R signaling pathways were informative predictors. This study must be replicated on larger samples and extended to predict response to other mood stabilizers.

Central Institute of Mental Health Medical Faculty Mannheim Heidelberg University Mannheim Baden Württemberg Germany

Centre for Human Genetics University of Marburg Marburg Germany

Centro Lucio Bini Cagliari e Roma Cagliari Italy

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany

Charité University Medical Center Campus Charité Mitte Institute for Social Medicine Epidemiology and Health Economics Berlin Germany

Department of Adult Psychiatry Poznan University of Medical Sciences Poznan Poland

Department of Biomedical Sciences Section of Neuroscience and Clinical Pharmacology University of Cagliari Cagliari Italy

Department of Biomedicine University of Basel Basel Switzerland

Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health Section of Psychiatry University of Cagliari Cagliari Italy

Department of Mental Health Poznan University of Medical Sciences Poznan Poland

Department of Pharmacology Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada

Department of Psychiatric Nursing Poznan University of Medical Sciences Poznan Poland

Department of Psychiatry Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Psychiatry Dalhousie University Halifax NS Canada

Department of Psychiatry McGill University Health Centre Montreal Québec Canada

Department of Psychiatry University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

Department of Psychiatry University of Wurzburg Wurzburg Germany

Faculty of Computer Science Dalhousie University Halifax NS Canada

Harvard Medical School and McLean Hospital Boston MA USA

Institute of Human Genetics University of Bonn School of Medicine and University Hospital Bonn Bonn Germany

Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics Munich Germany

Montreal Neurological Institute McGill University Montreal QC Canada

Mood Disorders Center of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

National Institute of Mental Health Bethesda MD USA

Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and San Giovanni di Dio Hospital University Hospital of Cagliari Cagliari Italy

See more in PubMed

Chesney E, Goodwin GM, Fazel S. Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review. World Psychiatry. 2014;13:153–160. doi: 10.1002/wps.20128. PubMed DOI PMC

Manchia M, et al. Genetic risk of suicidal behavior in bipolar spectrum disorder: analysis of 737 pedigrees. Bipolar Disord. 2013;15:496–506. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12088. PubMed DOI

Yatham LN, et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2018;20:97–170. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12609. PubMed DOI PMC

Drancourt N, et al. Duration of untreated bipolar disorder: missed opportunities on the long road to optimal treatment. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2013;127:136–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01917.x. PubMed DOI

Nunes A, et al. Prediction of lithium response using clinical data. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2020;141:131–141. doi: 10.1111/acps.13122. PubMed DOI

Grof, P. Responders to long-term lithium treatment. In Lithium in Neuropsychiatry: The Comprehensive Guide. (eds. Bauer, M., Grof, P. & Muller-Oerlinghausen, B.) 157–178 (Informa Healthcare, UK, 2006).

Grof P, et al. Is response to prophylactic lithium a familial trait? J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2002;63:942–947. doi: 10.4088/JCP.v63n1013. PubMed DOI

Amare, A. T., et al. Association of polygenic score for major depression with response to lithium in patients with bipolar disorder. Mol. Psychiatry. http://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-020-0689-5 (2020). In press PubMed

Amare AT, et al. Association of polygenic score for schizophrenia and HLA antigen and inflammation genes with response to lithium in bipolar affective disorder: a genome-wide association study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75:65–74. PubMed PMC

Hou L, et al. Genetic variants associated with response to lithium treatment in bipolar disorder: a genome-wide association study. Lancet. 2016;387:1085–1093. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00143-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Manchia M, et al. Assessment of response to lithium maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder: a Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) Report. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e65636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065636. PubMed DOI PMC

Breiman L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001;45:5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324. DOI

Pedregosa F, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012;12:2825–2830.

He H, Garcia E. Learning from imbalanced data sets. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010;21:1263–1264.

Mi H, et al. Protocol update for large-scale genome and gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system (v.14.0) Nat. Protoc. 2019;14:703–721. doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0128-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Gershon S, Chengappa K, Malhi G. Lithium specificity in bipolar illness: a classic agent for the classic disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2009;11:34–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00709.x. PubMed DOI

Alda M. The phenotypic spectra of bipolar disorder. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004;14:S94–S99. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.03.006. PubMed DOI

Passmore M, et al. Phenotypic spectra of bipolar disorder in responders to lithium versus lamotrigine. Bipolar Disord. 2003;5:110–114. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-5618.2003.00026.x. PubMed DOI

Kleindienst N, Engel R, Greil W. Which clinical factors predict response to prophylactic lithium? A systematic review for bipolar disorders. Bipolar Disord. 2005;7:404–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2005.00244.x. PubMed DOI

Hui T, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical predictors of lithium response in bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2019;140:94–115. doi: 10.1111/acps.13062. PubMed DOI PMC

Backlund L, Ehnvall A, Hetta J, Isacsson G, AAgren H. Identifying predictors for good lithium response - a retrospective analysis of 100 patients with bipolar disorder using a life-charting method. Eur. Psychiatry. 2009;24:171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2008.12.009. PubMed DOI

Tondo L, Hennen J, Baldessarini R. Rapid-cycling bipolar disorder: effects of long-term treatments. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2003;108:4–14. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00126.x. PubMed DOI

Kleindienst N, Greil W. Differential efficacy of lithium and carbamazepine in the prophylaxis of bipolar disorder: results of the MAP study. Neuropsychobiology. 2000;42:2–10. doi: 10.1159/000054844. PubMed DOI

Kendler K. From many to one to many - the search for causes of psychiatric illness. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76:1085–1091. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1200. PubMed DOI

Cruceanu C, et al. Rare susceptibility variants for bipolar disorder suggest a role for G protein-coupled receptors. Mol. Psychiatry. 2018;23:2050–2056. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.223. PubMed DOI

Bezchlibnyk Y, Young L. The neurobiology of bipolar disorder: focus on signal transduction pathways and the regulation of gene expression. Can. J. Psychiatry. 2002;47:135–148. doi: 10.1177/070674370204700203. PubMed DOI

Gonzalez-Maeso J, Meana J. Heterotrimeric G proteins: insights into the neurobiology of mood disorders. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2006;4:127–138. doi: 10.2174/157015906776359586. PubMed DOI PMC

Saxena A, et al. Role of protein kinase C in bipolar disorder: a review of the current literature. Mol. Neuropsychiatry. 2017;3:108–124. doi: 10.1159/000480349. PubMed DOI PMC

Vosahlikova M, Svoboda P. Lithium – therapeutic tool endowed with multiple beneficiary effects caused by multiple mechanisms. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Wars.) 2016;76:1–19. PubMed

Geoffroy PA, et al. Lithium response in bipolar disorders and core clock genes expression. World J. Biol. Psychiatry. 2018;19:619–632. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2017.1282174. PubMed DOI

McCarthy MJ, et al. Chronotype and cellular circadian rhythms predict the clinical response to lithium maintenance treatment in patients with bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44:620–628. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0273-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Hunsberger JG, et al. Novel integrative genomic tool for interrogating lithium response in bipolar disorder. Transl. Psychiatry. 2015;5:e504. doi: 10.1038/tp.2014.139. PubMed DOI PMC

Reinbold CS, et al. Analysis of the influence of microRNAs in lithium response in bipolar disorder. Front. Psychiatry. 2018;9:207. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00207. PubMed DOI PMC

Maloney B, et al. Lithium alters expression of RNAs in a type-specific manner in differentiated human neuroblastoma neuronal cultures, including specific genes involved in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:18261. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54076-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Schnack H, Khan R. Detecting neuroimaging biomarkers for psychiatric disorders: sample size matters. Front. Psychiatry. 2016;7:50. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00050. PubMed DOI PMC

Nunes A, et al. Using structural MRI to identify bipolar disorders – 13 site machine learning study in 3020 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorders Working Group. Mol. Psychiatry. 2020;25:2130–2143. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0228-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Mertens J, et al. Differential responses to lithium in hyperexcitable neurons from patients with bipolar disorder. Nature. 2015;527:95–99. doi: 10.1038/nature15526. PubMed DOI PMC

Schulze T, et al. The international consortium on lithium genetics (ConLiGen): an initiative by the NIMH and IGSLI to study the genetic basis of response to lithium treatment. Neuropsychobiology. 2010;62:72–78. doi: 10.1159/000314708. PubMed DOI PMC

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...