During social interactions, humans tend to imitate one another involuntarily. To investigate the neurocognitive mechanisms driving this tendency, researchers often employ stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) tasks to assess the influence that action observation has on action execution. This is referred to as automatic imitation (AI). The stimuli used frequently in SRC procedures to elicit AI often confound action-related with other nonsocial influences on behaviour; however, in response to the rotated hand-action stimuli employed increasingly, AI partly reflects unspecific up-right/down-left biases in stimulus-response mapping. Despite an emerging awareness of this confounding orthogonal spatial-compatibility effect, psychological and neuroscientific research into social behaviour continues to employ these stimuli to investigate AI. To increase recognition of this methodological issue, the present study measured the systematic influence of orthogonal spatial effects on behavioural and neurophysiological measures of AI acquired with rotated hand-action stimuli in SRC tasks. In Experiment 1, behavioural data from a large sample revealed that complex orthogonal spatial effects exert an influence on AI over and above any topographical similarity between observed and executed actions. Experiment 2 reproduced this finding in a more systematic, within-subject design, and high-density electroencephalography revealed that electrocortical expressions of AI elicited also are modulated by orthogonal spatial compatibility. Finally, source localisations identified a collection of cortical areas sensitive to this spatial confound, including nodes of the multiple-demand and semantic-control networks. These results indicate that AI measured on SRC procedures with the rotated hand stimuli used commonly might reflect neurocognitive mechanisms associated with spatial associations rather than imitative tendencies.

1st Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University and St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czechia

Behavioural and Social Neuroscience Central European Institute of Technology Masaryk University Kamenice 5 625 00 Brno Czechia

Department of Psychology School of Life and Health Sciences Aston University Birmingham UK

Institue of Psychology Czech Academy of Sciences Brno Czechia

Multimodal and Functional Neuroimaging Central European Institute of Technology Masaryk University Brno Czechia

See more in PubMed

Aicken MD, Wilson AD, Williams JHG, Mon-Williams M. Methodological issues in measures of imitative reaction times. Brain and Cognition. 2007;63(3):304–308. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.09.005. PubMed DOI

Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: One decade on. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2014;18(4):177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003. PubMed DOI

Barredo J, Öztekin I, Badre D. Ventral fronto-temporal pathway supporting cognitive control of episodic memory retrieval. Cerebral Cortex. 2015;25(4):1004–1019. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht291. PubMed DOI PMC

Bertenthal BI, Longo MR, Kosobud A. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2006;32(2):210–225. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.210. PubMed DOI

Bertenthal BI, Scheutz M. In praise of a model but not its conclusions: Commentary on cooper, catmur, and heyes (2012) Cognitive Science. 2013;37(4):631–641. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12039. PubMed DOI

Boyer TW, Longo MR, Bertenthal BI. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities. Acta Psychologica. 2012;139(3):440–448. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.003. PubMed DOI

Brass M, Bekkering H, Prinz W. Movement observation affects movement execution: Evidence from a simple response task paradigm. Acta Psychologica. 2001;106:3–22. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00024-X. PubMed DOI

Brunet, D., Murray, M. M., & Michel, C. M. (2011). Spatiotemporal Analysis of Multichannel EEG : CARTOOL, 2011. 10.1155/2011/813870 PubMed PMC

Caligiore D, Pezzulo G, Miall RC, Baldassarre G. The contribution of brain sub-cortical loops in the expression and acquisition of action understanding abilities. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2013;37(10):2504–2515. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.016. PubMed DOI PMC

Camilleri JA, Müller VI, Fox P, Laird AR, Hoffstaedter F, Kalenscher T, Eickhoff SB. Definition and characterization of an extended multiple-demand network. NeuroImage. 2018;165(July 2017):138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.020. PubMed DOI PMC

Casasanto D. Embodiment of Abstract Concepts: Good and Bad in Right- and Left-Handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2009;138(3):351–367. doi: 10.1037/a0015854. PubMed DOI

Caspers S, Zilles K, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB. ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. NeuroImage. 2010;50(3):1148–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112. PubMed DOI PMC

Catmur, C, & Heyes, C. (2011). Time course analyses confirm independence of automatic imitation and spatial compatibility effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(2), 409–421. 10.1037/a0019325 PubMed

Catmur C, Walsh V, Heyes C. Associative sequence learning: The role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009;364(1528):2369–2380. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0048. PubMed DOI PMC

Chartrand TL, Lakin JL. The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annual Review of Psychology. 2013;64:285–308. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143754. PubMed DOI

Cho YS, Proctor RW. Influences of hand posture and hand position on compatibility effects for up-down stimuli mapped to left-right responses: Evidence for a hand referent hypothesis. Perception and Psychophysics. 2002;64(8):1301–1315. doi: 10.3758/BF03194773. PubMed DOI

Cho YS, Proctor RW. Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2003;10(1):45–73. doi: 10.3758/BF03196468. PubMed DOI

Cho YS, Proctor RW. Influences of multiple spatial stimulus and response codes on orthogonal stimulus - Response compatibility. Perception and Psychophysics. 2004;66(6):1003–1017. doi: 10.3758/BF03194991. PubMed DOI

Cho YS, Proctor RW. Representing response position relative to display location: Influence on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology. 2005;58(5):839–864. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000359. PubMed DOI

Cieslik EC, Mueller VI, Eickhoff CR, Langner R, Eickhoff SB. Three key regions for supervisory attentional control: Evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2015;48:22–34. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.003. PubMed DOI PMC

Coito A, Michel CM, Van Mierlo P, Vulliemoz S, Plomp G. Directed Functional Brain Connectivity Based on EEG Source Imaging: Methodology and Application to Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2016;63(12):2619–2628. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2619665. PubMed DOI

Cook JL, Bird G. Atypical social modulation of imitation in autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2012;42(6):1045–1051. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1341-7. PubMed DOI PMC

Cooper RP, Catmur C, Heyes C. Are automatic imitation and spatial compatibility mediated by different processes? Cognitive Science. 2013;37(4):605–630. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01252.x. PubMed DOI

Cracco E, Bardi L, Desmet C, Genschow O, Rigoni D, De Coster L, et al. Automatic imitation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 2018;144(5):453–500. doi: 10.1037/bul0000143. PubMed DOI

Cracco E, Brass M. Reaction time indices of automatic imitation measure imitative response tendencies. Consciousness and Cognition. 2019;68(December 2018):115–118. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.001. PubMed DOI

Cross KA, Torrisi S, Reynolds Losin EA, Iacoboni M. Controlling automatic imitative tendencies: Interactions between mirror neuron and cognitive control systems. NeuroImage. 2013;83:493–504. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.01.002.The. PubMed DOI PMC

Darda KM, Butler EE, Ramsey R. Functional Specificity and Sex Differences in the Neural Circuits Supporting the Inhibition of Automatic Imitation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2018;30(6):914–933. doi: 10.1162/jocn. PubMed DOI

Darda, K. M., Butler, E. E., & Ramsey, R. (2019). Individual differences in Social and Non-Social Cognitive Control, 1–21. PubMed

Darda, K. M., Butler, E. E., & Ramsey, R. (2020). Individual differences in social and non-social cognitive control. Cognition, 202(October 2019). 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104317 PubMed

Darda KM, Ramsey R. The inhibition of automatic imitation: A meta-analysis and synthesis of fMRI studies. NeuroImage. 2019;197(April):320–329. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.059. PubMed DOI

de Guzman M, Bird G, Banissy MJ, Catmur C. Self–other control processes in social cognition: from imitation to empathy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2016;371(1686):20150079. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0079. PubMed DOI PMC

Deschrijver E, Wiersema JR, Brass M. Disentangling Neural Sources of the Motor Interference Effect in High Functioning Autism: An EEG-Study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2017;47(3):690–700. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2991-2. PubMed DOI

Deschrijver E, Wiersema JR, Brass M. The influence of action observation on action execution: Dissociating the contribution of action on perception, perception on action, and resolving conflict. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience. 2017;17(2):381–393. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0485-5. PubMed DOI

Duncan J. The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2010;14(4):172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.004. PubMed DOI

Farwaha S, Obhi SS. Socioeconomic status and self–other processing: socioeconomic status predicts interference in the automatic imitation task. Experimental Brain Research. 2020;238(4):833–841. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05761-7. PubMed DOI

Fedorenko E, Duncan J, Kanwisher N. Broad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(41):16616–16621. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315235110. PubMed DOI PMC

Galang, C. M., & Obhi, S. S. (2020). Automatic imitation does not predict levels of prosocial behaviour in a modified dictator game. Acta Psychologica, 204(November 2019). 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103022 PubMed

Gordon A, Geddert R, Hogeveen J, Krug MK, Obhi S, Solomon M. Not So Automatic Imitation: Expectation of Incongruence Reduces Interference in Both Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typical Development. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2020;50(4):1310–1323. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04355-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Gowen E, Bolton E, Poliakoff E. Believe it or not: Moving non-biological stimuli believed to have human origin can be represented as human movement. Cognition. 2016;146:431–438. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.010. PubMed DOI

Heyes C. Automatic Imitation. Psychological Bulletin. 2011;137(3):463–483. doi: 10.1037/a0022288. PubMed DOI

Hogeveen J, Obhi SS. Automatic imitation is automatic, but less so for narcissists. Experimental Brain Research. 2013;224(4):613–621. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3339-6. PubMed DOI

Hogeveen J, Obhi SS, Banissy MJ, Santiesteban I, Press C, Catmur C, Bird G. Task-dependent and distinct roles of the temporoparietal junction and inferior frontal cortex in the control of imitation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2014;10(7):1003–1009. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu148. PubMed DOI PMC

Hu S, Yao D, Bringas-Vega ML, Qin Y, Valdes-Sosa PA. The Statistics of EEG Unipolar References: Derivations and Properties. Brain Topography. 2019;32(4):696–703. doi: 10.1007/s10548-019-00706-y. PubMed DOI PMC

Iani C, Milanese N, Rubichi S. The influence of prior practice and handedness on the orthogonal Simon effect. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014;5(FEB):1–7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00039. PubMed DOI PMC

Jefferies E. The neural basis of semantic cognition: Converging evidence from neuropsychology, neuroimaging and TMS. Cortex. 2013;49(3):611–625. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.10.008. PubMed DOI

Jiménez L, Recio S, Méndez A, Lorda MJ, Permuy B, Méndez C. Automatic imitation and spatial compatibility in a key-pressing task. Acta Psychologica. 2012;141(1):96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.007. PubMed DOI

Koski, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M. C., Woods, R. P., & Mazziotta, J. C. (2003). Modulation of cortical activity during different imitative behaviors. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89(1), 460–471. 10.1152/jn.00248.2002 PubMed

Lambon Ralph MA, Jefferies E, Patterson K, Rogers TT. The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2017;18(1):42–55. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.150. PubMed DOI

Longo MR, Bertenthal BI. Attention modulates the specificity of automatic imitation to human actors. Experimental Brain Research. 2009;192(4):739–744. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1649-5. PubMed DOI

Marsh LE, Bird G, Catmur C. The imitation game: Effects of social cues on ‘imitation’ are domain-general in nature. NeuroImage. 2016;139:368–375. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.050. PubMed DOI

Mégevand P, Spinelli L, Genetti M, Brodbeck V, Momjian S, Schaller K, et al. Electric source imaging of interictal activity accurately localises the seizure onset zone. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 2014;85(1):38–43. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305515. PubMed DOI

Mengotti P, Corradi-Dell’Acqua C, Rumiati RI. Imitation components in the human brain: An fMRI study. NeuroImage. 2012;59(2):1622–1630. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.004. PubMed DOI

Mengotti P, Ticini LF, Waszak F, Schütz-Bosbach S, Rumiati RI. Imitating others’ actions: Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal opercula reveals the processes underlying automatic imitation. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2013;37(2):316–322. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12019. PubMed DOI

Milenkovic S, Dragovic M. Modification of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory: A replication study. Laterality. 2013;18(3):340–348. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2012.683196. PubMed DOI

Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley JB. Brain regions with mirror properties: A meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2012;36(1):341–349. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.004. PubMed DOI

Nishimura Y, Ikeda Y, Higuchi S. The relationship between inhibition of automatic imitation and personal cognitive styles. Journal of Physiological Anthropology. 2018;37(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40101-018-0184-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Noonan KA, Jefferies E, Visser M, Lambon Ralph AA. Going beyond Inferior Prefrontal Involvement in Semantic Control: Evidence for the Additional Contribution of Dorsal Angular Gyrus and Posterior Middle Temporal Cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2013;25(11):1824–1850. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00442. PubMed DOI

Norman D, Shallice T. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In: Gazzaniga MS, editor. Cognitive neuroscience: A reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2000. pp. 376–390.

Pascual-Marqui RD, Esslen M, Kochi K, Lehmann D. Functional imaging with low resolution electromagnetic tomography ( LORETA ): a review. Methods & Findings in Experimental & Clinical Pharmacology. 2002;2002(24 C):91–95. PubMed

Praamstra P, Oostenveld R. Attention and movement-related motor cortex activation: A high-density EEG study of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Brain Research. 2003;16(3):309–322. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00286-0. PubMed DOI

Proctor RW, Cho YS. Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin. 2006;132(3):416–442. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416. PubMed DOI

Proctor RW, Vu K-PL. Stimulus – Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application. Boca Raton, FL: CRC/​Taylor &​ Francis; 2006.

Proctor RW, Xiong A. Polarity Correspondence as a General Compatibility Principle. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2015;24(6):446–451. doi: 10.1177/0963721415607305. DOI

Ralph MAL, Jefferies E, Patterson K, Rogers TT. The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2017;18(1):42. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.150. PubMed DOI

Ramsey R. What are reaction time indices of automatic imitation measuring? Consciousness and Cognition. 2018;65:240–254. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.08.006. PubMed DOI

Ranganath C, Ritchey M. Two cortical systems for memory-guided behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2012;13(10):713–726. doi: 10.1038/nrn3338. PubMed DOI

Rauchbauer B, Pfabigan DM, Lamm C. Event-related potentials of automatic imitation are modulated by ethnicity during stimulus processing, but not during motor execution. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30926-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. the Mirror-Neuron System. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2004;27(1):169–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230. PubMed DOI

Santiesteban I, Banissy MJ, Catmur C, Bird G. Enhancing social ability by stimulating right temporoparietal junction. Current Biology. 2012;22(23):2274–2277. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.018. PubMed DOI

Santiesteban I, Banissy MJ, Catmur C, Bird G. Functional lateralization of temporoparietal junction - imitation inhibition, visual perspective-taking and theory of mind. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2015;42(8):2527–2533. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13036. PubMed DOI

Sebastian A, Pohl MF, Klöppel S, Feige B, Lange T, Stahl C, Tüscher O. Disentangling common and specific neural subprocesses of response inhibition. NeuroImage. 2013;64(1):601–615. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.020. PubMed DOI

Seeber M, Cantonas LM, Hoevels M, Sesia T, Visser-Vandewalle V, Michel CM. Subcortical electrophysiological activity is detectable with high-density EEG source imaging. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1):1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08725-w. PubMed DOI PMC

Shaw, D. J., Czekóová, K., Pennington, C. R., Qureshi, A. W., Špiláková, B., Salazar, M., … Urbánek, T. (2020). You ≠ me: individual differences in the structure of social cognition. Psychological Research, 1139–1156. 10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3 PubMed PMC

Shaw DJ, Czekóová K, Porubanová M. Orthogonal-compatibility effects confound automatic imitation: implications for measuring self–other distinction. Psychological Research. 2017;81(6):1152–1165. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0814-x. PubMed DOI

Simon JR. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1969;81(1):174–176. doi: 10.1037/h0027448. PubMed DOI

Sokolov AA, Miall RC, Ivry RB. The Cerebellum: Adaptive Prediction for Movement and Cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2017;21(5):313–332. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.02.005. PubMed DOI PMC

Sowden S, Catmur C. The role of the right temporoparietal junction in the control of imitation. Cerebral Cortex. 2015;25(4):1107–1113. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht306. PubMed DOI PMC

Stürmer B, Aschersleben G, Prinz W. Correspondence Effects with Manual Gestures and Postures: A Study of Imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2000;26(6):1746–1759. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.6.1746. PubMed DOI

Thierry G, Pegna AJ, Dodds C, Roberts M, Basan S, Downing P. An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human body. NeuroImage. 2006;32(2):871–879. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.060. PubMed DOI

Trilla I, Wnendt H, Dziobek I. Conditional effects of gaze on automatic imitation: the role of autistic traits. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72513-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Joliot M. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage. 2002;15(1):273–289. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978. PubMed DOI

Valle-Inclán F. The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study. Biological Psychology. 1996;43(2):147–162. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(95)05181-3. PubMed DOI

Van Overwalle F, D’aes T, Mariën P. Social cognition and the cerebellum: A meta-analytic connectivity analysis. Human Brain Mapping. 2015;36(12):5137–5154. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23002. PubMed DOI PMC

Visser, M., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralf, M. A. (2009). Semantic Processing in the Anterior Temporal Lobes : A Meta-analysis of the Functional. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1083–1094. PubMed

Wang X, Bernhardt BC, Karapanagiotidis T, De Caso I, Gonzalez Alam TR d J, Cotter Z, Jefferies E. The structural basis of semantic control: Evidence from individual differences in cortical thickness. NeuroImage. 2018;181:480–489. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.044. PubMed DOI

Yao D, Qin Y, Hu S, Dong L, Bringas Vega ML, Valdés Sosa PA. Which Reference Should We Use for EEG and ERP practice? Brain Topography. 2019;32(4):530–549. doi: 10.1007/s10548-019-00707-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhang R, Geng X, Lee TMC. Large-scale functional neural network correlates of response inhibition: an fMRI meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function. 2017;222(9):3973–3990. doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1443-x. PubMed DOI PMC