You ≠ me: individual differences in the structure of social cognition

. 2020 Jun ; 84 (4) : 1139-1156. [epub] 20181015

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid30324265

Grantová podpora
GA15-16738S Grantová Agentura České Republiky

Odkazy

PubMed 30324265
PubMed Central PMC7239802
DOI 10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3
PII: 10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

This study investigated the structure of social cognition, and how it is influenced by personality; specifically, how various socio-cognitive capabilities, and the pattern of inter-relationships and co-dependencies among them differ between divergent personality styles. To measure social cognition, a large non-clinical sample (n = 290) undertook an extensive battery of self-report and performance-based measures of visual perspective taking, imitative tendencies, affective empathy, interoceptive accuracy, emotion regulation, and state affectivity. These same individuals then completed the Personality Styles and Disorders Inventory. Latent Profile Analysis revealed two dissociable personality profiles that exhibited contrasting cognitive and affective dispositions, and multivariate analyses indicated further that these profiles differed on measures of social cognition; individuals characterised by a flexible and adaptive personality profile expressed higher action orientation (emotion regulation) compared to those showing more inflexible tendencies, along with better visual perspective taking, superior interoceptive accuracy, less imitative tendencies, and lower personal distress and negativity. These characteristics point towards more efficient self-other distinction, and to higher cognitive control more generally. Moreover, low-level cognitive mechanisms served to mediate other higher level socio-emotional capabilities. Together, these findings elucidate the cognitive and affective underpinnings of individual differences in social behaviour, providing a data-driven model that should guide future research in this area.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ainley V, Maister L, Tsakiris M. Heartfelt empathy? No association between interoceptive awareness, questionnaire measures of empathy, reading the mind in the eyes task or the director task. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;1:554. doi: 10.3389/fpsycg.2015.00554. PubMed DOI PMC

Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;19:716–723. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705. DOI

Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173. PubMed DOI

Baron-Cohen S. Autism: The empathizing-systemizing (E-S) theory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009;1156:68–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04467.x. PubMed DOI

Bastiaansen JA, Thioux M, Keysers C. Evidence for mirror systems in emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2009;364:2391–2404. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0058. PubMed DOI PMC

Baumann N, Kuhl J, Kazén M. Left-hemispheric activation and self-infiltration: Testing a neuropsychological model of internalization. Motivation and Emotion. 2005;29(3):135–163. doi: 10.1007/s11031-005-9439-x. DOI

Bentley SV, Greenaway KH, Haslam A. Cognition in context: Social inclusion attenuates the psychological boundary between self and other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2017;73:42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.008. DOI

Bertenthal BI, Longo MR, Kosobud A. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2006;32:210. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.210. PubMed DOI

Bird G, Viding E. The self to other model of empathy: providing a new framework for understanding empathy impairments in psychopathy, autism, and alexithymia. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2014;47:520–532. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.021. PubMed DOI

Block J. Personality as an affect-processing system: Toward an integrative theory. New York: Psychology Press; 2002.

Böckler A, Tusche A, Singer T. The structure of human prosociality: Differentiating altruistically motivated, norm motivated, strategically motivated, and self-reported prosocial behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2016;7(6):530–541. doi: 10.1177/1948550616639650. DOI

Brass M, Bekkering H, Prinz W. Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica. 2001;106:3–22. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00024-X. PubMed DOI

Brass M, Ruby P, Spengler S. Inhibition of imitative behaviour and social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2009;364:2359–2367. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0066. PubMed DOI PMC

Bruyer R, Brysbaert M. Combining speed and accuracy in cognitive psychology: is the inverse efficiency score (IES) a better dependent variable than the mean reaction time (RT) and the percentage of errors (PE)? Psychologica Belgica. 2011;51:5–13. doi: 10.5334/pb-51-1-5. DOI

Bukowski H, Samson D. Can emotions influence level-1 visual perspective taking? Cognitive Neuroscience. 2016;7:182–191. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1043879. PubMed DOI

Butler EE, Ward R, Ramsey R. Investigating the relationship between stable personality characteristics and automatic imitation. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0129651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129651. PubMed DOI PMC

Catmur C, Walsh V, Heyes C. Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2009;364:2369–2380. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0048. PubMed DOI PMC

Chartrand TL, Lakin JL. The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annual Review of Psychology. 2013;64:285–308. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143754. PubMed DOI

Cikara M, Bruneau E, Van Bavel JJ, Saxe R. Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2014;55:110–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007. PubMed DOI PMC

Coll MP, Viding E, Rütgen M, Silani G, Lamm C, Catmur C, Bird G. Are we really measuring empathy? Proposal for a new measurement framework. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2017;83:132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.009. PubMed DOI

Cracco E, Bardi L, Desmet C, Genschow O, Rigoni D, De Coster L, Brass M. Automatic imitation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 2018;144:453–500. doi: 10.1037/bul0000143. PubMed DOI

Critchley HD, Garfinkel SN. Interoception and emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2017;17:7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.020. PubMed DOI

Critchley HD, Harrison NA. Visceral influences on brain and behavior. Neuron. 2013;77:624–638. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.008. PubMed DOI

Critchley HD, Wiens S, Rotshtein P, Dolan RJ. Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nature Neuroscience. 2004;7:189. doi: 10.1038/nn1176. PubMed DOI

Cronbach LJ, Furby L. How we should measure” change”: Or should we? Psychological bulletin. 1970;74(1):68. doi: 10.1037/h0029382. DOI

Czekóová, K., Pokorná, Z., & Špiláková, B. (2016). Vývoj metody pro posouzení sociální kognice. Sociální procesy a osobnost 2015—Otázky a výzvy, 67–72. Sborník příspěvků. Masarykova Univerzita Brno.

Czekóová K, Shaw DJ, Urbánek T. Personality systems, spirituality, and existential well-being: A person-centred perspective. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. 2016 doi: 10.1037/rel0000109. DOI

Davidson RJ, Putnam KM, Larson CL. Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation—a possible prelude to violence. Science. 2000;289:591–594. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5479.591. PubMed DOI

Davis MH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983;44:113–126. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113. DOI

de Corte K, Buysse A, Verhofstadt L, Roeyers H, Ponnet K, Davis M. Measuring empathic tendencies: Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the interpersonal reactivity index. Psychologica Belgica. 2007;47:235–260. doi: 10.5334/pb-47-4-235. DOI

de Guzman M, Bird G, Banissy MJ, Catmur C. Self–other control processes in social cognition: from imitation to empathy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2016;371:20150079. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0079. PubMed DOI PMC

de Vignemont F, Singer T. The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006;10:435–441. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008. PubMed DOI

Domschke K, Stevens S, Pfleiderer B, Gerlach AL. Interoceptive sensitivity in anxiety and anxiety disorders: an overview and integration of neurobiological findings. Clinical Psychology Review. 2010;30:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.08.008. PubMed DOI

Donnellan MB, Robins RW. Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types: Issues and controversies. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2010;4(11):1070–1083. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00313.x. DOI

Dunn BD, Stefanovitch I, Evans D, Oliver C, Hawkins A, Dalgleish T. Can you feel the beat? Interoceptive awareness is an interactive function of anxiety-and depression-specific symptom dimensions. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2010;48:1133–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.07.006. PubMed DOI PMC

Dziobek I, Rogers K, Fleck S, Bahnemann M, Heekeren HR, Wolf OT, Convit A. Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET) Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2008;38:464–473. doi: 10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x. PubMed DOI

Eisenberg N, Fabes RA, Murphy B, Karbon M, Maszk P, Smith M, O’boyle C, Suh K. The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional and situational empathy-related responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;66:776. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.776. PubMed DOI

Epley N, Keysar B, van Boven L, Gilovich T. Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004;87:327–339. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327. PubMed DOI

Fertuck EA, Lenzenweger MF, Clarkin JF, Hoermann S, Stanley B. Executive neurocognition, memory systems, and borderline personality disorder. Clinical Psychology Review. 2006;26:346–375. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.05.008. PubMed DOI

Filimon F, Nelson JD, Hagler DJ, Sereno MI. Human cortical representations for reaching: mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery. Neuroimage. 2007;37:1315–1328. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.008. PubMed DOI PMC

Frick C, Lang S, Kotchoubey B, Sieswerda S, Dinu-Biringer R, Berger M, Veser S, Essig M, x`& Barnow S. Hypersensitivity in borderline personality disorder during mindreading. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041650. PubMed DOI PMC

Frith CD, Frith U. Mechanisms of social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology. 2012;63:287–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100449. PubMed DOI

Füstös J, Gramann K, Herbert BM, Pollatos O. On the embodiment of emotion regulation: Interoceptive awareness facilitates reappraisal. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2012;8:911–917. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss089. PubMed DOI PMC

Gallese V. Mirror neurons, embodied simulation and a second-person approach to mindreading. Cortex. 2013;49:2954–2956. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.09.008. PubMed DOI

Garfinkel SN, Seth AK, Barrett AB, Suzuki K, Critchley HD. Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological Psychology. 2015;104:65–74. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004. PubMed DOI

Genschow O, van Den Bossche S, Cracco E, Bardi L, Rigoni D, Brass M. Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0183784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183784. PubMed DOI PMC

Gignac GE, Szodorai ET. Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences. 2016;102:74–78. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069. DOI

Gilet AL, Mella N, Studer J, Grühn D, Labouvie-Vief G. Assessing dispositional empathy in adults: A French validation of the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. 2013;45:42. doi: 10.1037/a0030425. DOI

Grezes J, Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping. 2001;12:1–19. doi: 10.1002/1097-0193(200101)12:1<1::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-V. PubMed DOI PMC

Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology. 2002;39:281–291. doi: 10.1017/S0048577201393198. PubMed DOI

Grynberg D, Pollatos O. Perceiving one’s body shapes empathy. Physiology & Behavior. 2015;140:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.12.026. PubMed DOI

Happé F, Cook JL, Bird G. The structure of social cognition: In(ter) dependence of sociocognitive processes. Annual Review of Psychology. 2017;68:243–267. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych.010416-044046. PubMed DOI

Hawk ST, Keijsers L, Branje SJ, Graaff JVD, Wied MD, Meeus W. Examining the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) among early and late adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2013;95:96–106. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.696080. PubMed DOI

Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guildford Press; 2013.

Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 2. New York: Guildford Press; 2018.

Hengartner MP, Müller M, Rodgers S, Rössler W, Ajdacic-Gross V. Interpersonal functioning deficits in association with DSM-IV personality disorder dimensions. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2014;49:317–325. doi: 10.1007/s00127-013-0707-x. PubMed DOI

Herbert BM, Muth ER, Pollatos O, Herbert C. Interoception across modalities: On the relationship between cardiac awareness and the sensitivity for gastric functions. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036646. PubMed DOI PMC

Herpertz SC, Bertsch K. The social-cognitive basis of personality disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 2014;27:73–77. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000026. PubMed DOI

Heyes C. Automatic imitation. Psychological Bulletin. 2011;137:463. doi: 10.1037/a0022288. PubMed DOI

Heyes C. Submentalizing: I am not really reading your mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:131–143. doi: 10.1177/1745691613518076. PubMed DOI

Hogeveen J, Obhi SS. Automatic imitation is automatic, but less so for narcissists. Experimental Brain Research. 2013;224:613–621. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3339-6. PubMed DOI

Hommel B. Between persistence and flexibility: The Yin and Yang of action control. Advances in Motivation Science. 2015;2:33–67. doi: 10.1016/bs.adms.2015.04.003. DOI

Hommel B, Colzato LS. The social transmission of metacontrol policies: Mechanisms underlying the interpersonal transfer of persistence and flexibility. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2017;81A:43–58. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.009. PubMed DOI

Iacoboni M. Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology. 2009;60:653–670. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604. PubMed DOI

Inzlicht M, Bartholow BD, Hirsh JB. Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2015;19:126–132. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.004. PubMed DOI PMC

Jabbi M, Bastiaansen J, Keysers C. A common anterior insula representation of disgust observation, experience and imagination shows divergent functional connectivity pathways. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002939. PubMed DOI PMC

Jostmann NB, Koole SL. On the regulation of cognitive control: Action orientation moderates the impact of high demands in stroop interference tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2007;136:593–609. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.593. PubMed DOI

Kanske P, Böckler A, Singer T. Models, mechanisms and moderators dissociating empathy and theory of mind. Current Topics in Behavioural Neuroscience. 2015;30:193–206. doi: 10.1007/7854_2015_412. PubMed DOI

Kazén M, Kuhl J, Quirin M. Personality interacts with implicit affect to predict performance in analytic versus holistic processing. Journal of Personality. 2015;83:251–261. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12100. PubMed DOI

Kenny DA, Judd CM. Power anomalies in testing mediation. Psychological Science. 2014;25(2):334–339. doi: 10.1177/0956797613502676. PubMed DOI

Keysar B, Barr DJ, Balin JA, Brauner JS. Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science. 2000;11:32–38. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00211. PubMed DOI

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, London: Guilford publications.

Knoll JF, Hodapp V. A comparison between two methods for assessing heartbeat perception. Psychophysiology. 1992;29:218–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1992.tb01689.x. PubMed DOI

Knowles ML. Social rejection increases perspective taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2012;55:126–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.008. DOI

Konstantareas MM, Stewart K. Affect regulation and temperament in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2006;36:143–154. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-0051-4. PubMed DOI

Koole SL, Fockenberg DA. Implicit emotion regulation under demanding conditions: The moderating role of action versus state orientation. Cognition and Emotion. 2011;25:440–452. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.544891. PubMed DOI

Koole SL, Kuhl J, Jostmann NB, Finkenauer C. Self-regulation in interpersonal relationships: the case of action versus state orientation. In: Vohs KD, Finkel EJ, editors. Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. New York: Guilford Press; 2006. pp. 360–383.

Ku G, Wang CS, Galinsky AD. Perception through a perspective-taking lens: Differential effects on judgment and behaviour. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2010;46:792–798. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.001. DOI

Kuhl J. A theory of self-regulation: Action versus state orientation, self-discrimination, and some applications. Applied Psychology. 1992;41:97–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1992.tb00688.x. DOI

Kuhl J. Action versus state orientation: Psychometric properties of the Action Control Scale (ACS-90) In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editors. Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation. Seattle: Hogrefe Huber; 1994. pp. 47–56.

Kuhl J. A theory of self-development: Affective fixation and the STAR model of personality disorders and related styles. Advances in Psychology. 2000;131:187–211. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4115(00)80012-6. DOI

Kuhl J. The volitional basis of personality systems interaction theory: Applications in learning and treatment contexts. International Journal of Educational Research. 2000;33:665–703. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00045-8. DOI

Kuhl J, Kazén M. PSSI—Inventář stylů osobnosti a poruch osobnosti. Praha: Testcentrum; 2002.

Kuhl J, Kazén M, Koole SL. Putting self-regulation theory into practice: A user's manual. Applied Psychology. 2006;55(3):408–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00260.x. DOI

Lamm C, Bukowski H, Silani G. From shared to distinct self–other representations in empathy: Evidence from neurotypical function and socio-cognitive disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: B. 2016;371:20150083. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0083. PubMed DOI PMC

Lamm C, Decety J, Singer T. Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage. 2011;54:2492–2502. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014. PubMed DOI

Langner O, Dotsch R, Bijlstra G, Wigboldus DH, Hawk ST, Van Knippenberg AD. Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition and Emotion. 2010;24(8):1377–1388. doi: 10.1080/02699930903485076. DOI

Lazarsfeld PF, Henry NW. Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1968.

Leighton J, Bird G, Orsini C, Heyes C. Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2010;46:905–910. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.001. DOI

Lo Y, Mendell N, Rubin D. Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika. 2001;88:767–778. doi: 10.1093/biomet/88.3.767. DOI

Mazza M, Pino MC, Mariano M, Tempesta D, Ferrara M, De Berardis D, Valenti M. Affective and cognitive empathy in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014;8:791. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00791. PubMed DOI PMC

McLachlan G, Peel D. Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley; 2000.

Melchers MC, Li M, Haas BW, Reuter M, Bischoff L, Montag C. Similar personality patterns are associated with empathy in four different countries. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00290. PubMed DOI PMC

Mogan R, Fischer R, Bulbulia JA. To be in synchrony or not? A meta-analysis of synchrony’s effects on behavior, perception, cognition and affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2017;72:13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.009. DOI

Moore RC, Dev SI, Jeste DV, Dziobek I, Eyler LT. Distinct neural correlates of emotional and cognitive empathy in older adults. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging. 2015;232:42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.10.016. PubMed DOI PMC

Morgan GB. Mixed mode latent class analysis: An examination of fit index performance for classification. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2015;22:76–86. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.935751. DOI

Moroni F, Procacci M, Pellecchia G, Semerari A, Nicolò G, Carcione A, Pedone R, Colle L. Mindreading dysfunction in avoidant personality disorder compared with other personality disorders. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2016;204:752–757. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000536. PubMed DOI

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

New AS, Rot MAH, Ripoll LH, Perez-Rodriguez MM, Lazarus S, Zipursky E, Weinstein SR, Koenigsberg HW, Hazlett EA, Goodman M, Siever LJ. Empathy and alexithymia in borderline personality disorder: Clinical and laboratory measures. Journal of Personality Disorders. 2012;26:660–675. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.5.660. PubMed DOI

Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling. 2007;14:535–569. doi: 10.1080/10705510701575396. DOI

Obhi SS, Hogeveen J, Giacomin M, Jordan CH. Automatic imitation is reduced in narcissists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2014;40:920. doi: 10.1037/a0034056. PubMed DOI

Okun MA, Shepard SA, Eisenberg N. The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional empathy-related responding among volunteers-in-training. Personality and Individual Differences. 2000;28:367–382. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00107-5. DOI

Paulus MP, Stein MB. Interoception in anxiety and depression. Brain Structure and Function. 2010;214:451–463. doi: 10.1007/s00429-010-0258-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Peterson JL, Bellows A, Peterson S. Promoting connection: Perspective-taking improves relationship closeness and perceived regard in participants with low implicit self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2015;56:160–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.013. DOI

Pile V, Haller SP, Hiu CF, Lau JY. Young people with higher social anxiety are less likely to adopt the perspective of another: Data from the director task. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 2017;55:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.11.002. PubMed DOI

Quirin M, Bode RC. An alternative to self-reports of trait and state affect. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2014;1:1–7. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000190. DOI

Quirin M, Bode RC, Kuhl J. Recovering from negative events by boosting implicit positive affect. Cognition and Emotion. 2011;25:559–570. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.536418. PubMed DOI

Quirin M, Kazén M, Kuhl J. When nonsense sounds happy or helpless: The implicit positive and negative affect test (IPANAT) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009;97:500–516. doi: 10.1037/a0016063. PubMed DOI

Ramaswamy V, DeSarbo WS, Reibstein DJ, Robinson WT. An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Marketing Science. 1993;12:103–124. doi: 10.1287/mksc.12.1.103. DOI

Rogers K, Dziobek I, Hassenstab J, Wolf OT, Convit A. Who cares? Revisiting empathy in asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2007;37:709–715. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0197-8. PubMed DOI

Samson D, Apperly IA, Braithwaite JJ, Andrews BJ, Bodley Scott SE. Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 2010;36:1255. doi: 10.1037/a0018729. PubMed DOI

Santiesteban I, Banissy MJ, Catmur C, Bird G. Enhancing social ability by stimulating right temporoparietal junction. Current Biology. 2012;22:2274–2277. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.018. PubMed DOI

Santiesteban I, White S, Cook J, Gilbert SJ, Heyes C, Bird G. Training social cognition: From imitation to theory of mind. Cognition. 2012;122:228–235. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.004. PubMed DOI

Schandry R. Heart beat perception and emotional experience. Psychophysiology. 1981;18:483–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb02486.x. PubMed DOI

Schipper M, Petermann F. Relating empathy and emotion regulation: Do deficits in empathy trigger emotion dysregulation? Social Neuroscience. 2013;8:101–107. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2012.761650. PubMed DOI

Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics. 1978;6:461–464. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136. DOI

Semerari A, Colle L, Pellecchia G, Buccione I, Carcione A, Dimaggio G, Nicolò G, Procacci M, Pedone R. Metacognitive dysfunctions in personality disorders: Correlations with disorder severity and personality styles. Journal of Personality Disorders. 2014;28:751–766. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2014_28_137. PubMed DOI

Semerari A, Colle L, Pellecchia G, Carcione A, Conti L, Fiore D, Moroni F, Nicolò G, Procacci M, Pedone R. Personality disorders and mindreading: Specific impairments in patients with borderline personality disorder compared to other PDs. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2015;203:626–631. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000339. PubMed DOI

Shamay-Tsoory SG. The neural bases for empathy. The Neuroscientist. 2011;17:18–24. doi: 10.1177/1073858410379268. PubMed DOI

Shamay-Tsoory SG, Aharon-Peretz J, Perry D. Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain. 2009;132:617–627. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn279. PubMed DOI

Shaw DJ, Czekóová K, Porubanová M. Orthogonal-compatibility effects confound automatic imitation: Implications for measuring self–other distinction. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. 2017;81:1152–1165. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0814-x. PubMed DOI

Silani G, Lamm C, Ruff CC, Singer T. Right supramarginal gyrus is crucial to overcome emotional egocentricity bias in social judgments. Journal of Neuroscience. 2013;33:15466–15476. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1488-13.2013. PubMed DOI PMC

Spengler S, Bird G, Brass M. Hyperimitation of actions is related to reduced understanding of others’ minds in autism spectrum conditions. Biological Psychiatry. 2010;68:1148–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.017. PubMed DOI

Steinbeis N. The role of self–other distinction in understanding others’ mental and emotional states: neurocognitive mechanisms in children and adults. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: B. 2016;371:20150074. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0074. PubMed DOI PMC

Su HJ, Lee S, Ding J, Comer LB. Relations among measures of trait empathy, empathetic response, and willingness to get involved in customer-contact situations. Psychological Reports. 2005;97:378–380. doi: 10.2466/pr0.97.2.378-380. PubMed DOI

Tabachnik BG, Fidell SL. Multicollinearity and singularity. Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education Inc; 2013. pp. 88–91.

Thoma P, Friedmann C, Suchan B. Empathy and social problem solving in alcohol dependence, mood disorders and selected personality disorders. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2013;37:448–470. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.024. PubMed DOI

Tomova L, von Dawans B, Heinrichs M, Silani G, Lamm C. Is stress affecting our ability to tune into others? Evidence for gender differences in the effects of stress on self–other distinction. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;43:95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.02.006. PubMed DOI

Tottenham N, Hare TA, Casey BJ. Behavioral assessment of emotion discrimination, emotion regulation, and cognitive control in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology. 2011;2:39. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00039. PubMed DOI PMC

Tsakiris M, Critchley H. Interoception beyond homeostasis: Affect, cognition and mental health. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2016;371:1708. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0002. PubMed DOI PMC

Urbánek T, Marček V. Investigating the effectiveness of working memory training in the context of Personality Systems Interaction theory. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. 2016;80:877–888. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0687-4. PubMed DOI

van der Ploeg MM, Brosschot JF, Thayer JF, Verkuil B. The implicit positive and negative affect test: Validity and relationship with cardiovascular stress-responses. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00425. PubMed DOI PMC

Weafer J, Baggott MJ, de Wit H. Test–retest reliability of behavioral measures of impulsive choice, impulsive action, and inattention. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2013;21:475. doi: 10.1037/a0033659. PubMed DOI PMC

Werner NS, Kerschreiter R, Kindermann NK, Duschek S. Interoceptive awareness as a moderator of affective responses to social exclusion. Journal of Psychophysiology. 2013;27:39–50. doi: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000086. DOI

Wicker B, Keysers C, Plailly J, Royet JP, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G. Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron. 2003;40:655–664. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00679-2. PubMed DOI

Zhao X, Lynch JG, Jr, Chen Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research. 2010;37(2):197–206. doi: 10.1086/651257. DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...