Adjuvant Pazopanib Versus Placebo After Nephrectomy in Patients With Localized or Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Overall Survival Analysis of the Phase 3 PROTECT Trial
Language English Country Switzerland Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
P30 CA008748
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
33461782
PubMed Central
PMC8407394
DOI
10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.029
PII: S0302-2838(20)31015-0
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Pazopanib, Renal cell carcinoma, Tyrosine kinase inhibitor,
- MeSH
- Indazoles MeSH
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell * drug therapy surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local prevention & control MeSH
- Kidney Neoplasms * drug therapy surgery MeSH
- Nephrectomy MeSH
- Disease-Free Survival MeSH
- Pyrimidines MeSH
- Sulfonamides MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Indazoles MeSH
- pazopanib MeSH Browser
- Pyrimidines MeSH
- Sulfonamides MeSH
Most studies indicate no benefit of adjuvant therapy with VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PROTECT (NCT01235962) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study to evaluate adjuvant pazopanib in patients with locally advanced RCC at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy (pazopanib, n = 769; placebo, n = 769). The results of the primary analysis showed no difference in disease-free survival between pazopanib 600 mg and placebo. Here we report the final overall survival (OS) analysis (median follow-up: pazopanib, 76 mo, interquartile range [IQR] 66-84; placebo, 77 mo, IQR 69-85). There was no significant difference in OS between the pazopanib and placebo arms (hazard ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.80-1.26; nominal p > 0.9). OS was worse for patients with T4 disease compared to those with less advanced disease and was better for patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 compared to those with lower BMI. OS was significantly better for patients who remained diseasefree at 2 yr after treatment compared with those who relapsed within 2 yr. These findings are consistent with the primary outcomes from PROTECT, indicating that adjuvant pazopanib does not confer a benefit in terms of OS for patients following resection of locally advanced RCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 PROTECT study, overall survival was similar for patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy who received adjuvant therapy with pazopanib or placebo. Pazopanib is not recommended as adjuvant therapy following resection of locally advanced RCC. This trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01235962.
Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
Altai Regional Cancer Center Barnaul Russia
Bordeaux University Hospital Bordeaux France
Charles University and General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland OH USA
Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA
Englander Institute for Precision Medicine Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY USA
Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation St Thomas' Hospital London UK
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
Novartis Oncology East Hanover NJ USA
Novartis Pharma AG Basel Switzerland
Palacky University Medical School and Teaching Hospital Olomouc Czech Republic
Queen Elizabeth 2 Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University Halifax NS Canada
State Institution of Healthcare Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary Omsk Russia
Sungkyunkwan University Seoul South Korea
Tallaght University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland Dublin Ireland
The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre Ottawa ON Canada
University Hospital Tubingen Tubingen Germany
University of Lubeck Medical School and Urologikum Lubeck Lubeck Germany
University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA
See more in PubMed
Haas NB, Manola J, Uzzo RG, et al.Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, nonmetastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016;387:2008–16. PubMed PMC
Haas NB, Manola J, Dutcher JP, et al.Adjuvant treatment for high-risk clear cell renal cancer: updated results of a high-risk subset of the ASSURE randomized trial. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:1249–52. PubMed PMC
Eisen TQG, Frangou E, Smith B, et al.Primary efficacy analysis results from the SORCE trial (RE05): adjuvant sorafenib for renal cell carcinoma at intermediate or high risk of relapse: an international, randomised double-blind phase III trial led by the MRC CTU at UCL. Ann Oncol 2019;30(Suppl 5):v851–934.
Gross-Goupil M, Kwon TG, Eto M, et al.Axitinib versus placebo as an adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase III, randomized ATLAS trial. Ann Oncol 2018;29:2371–8. PubMed PMC
Ravaud A, Motzer RJ, Pandha HS, et al.Adjuvant sunitinib in high-risk renal-cell carcinoma after nephrectomy. N Engl J Med 2016;375:2246–54. PubMed
Motzer RJ, Haas NB, Donskov F, et al.Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant pazopanib versus placebo after nephrectomy in patients with localized or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:3916–23. PubMed PMC
Sternberg CN, Donskov F, Haas NB, et al.Pazopanib exposure relationship with clinical efficacy and safety in the adjuvant treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:3005–13. PubMed PMC
Choi Y, Park B, Jeong BC, et al.Body mass index and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a clinical-based cohort and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2013;132:625–34. PubMed
Hakimi AA, Furberg H, Zabor EC, et al.An epidemiologic and genomic investigation into the obesity paradox in renal cell carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:1862–70. PubMed PMC
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01235962