AIMS: An effective decontamination procedure of personnel wearing personal protective equipment is required by CBRN responders and healthcare workers when dealing with biological warfare agents or natural outbreaks caused by highly contagious pathogens. This study aimed to identify critical factors affecting the efficacy of peracetic acid (PAA)-based disinfectants and products containing either hydrogen peroxide or sodium hypochlorite under the same conditions. METHODS AND RESULTS: The influence of concentration, application (contact) time, erroneous human behaviour, interfering substance, technical assets and weather conditions on disinfection efficacy against Bacillus subtilis spores were assessed in 14 experimental groups. Residual contamination of protective suits was measured to provide responders with readily understandable information (up to 100 colony forming units classified a suit as disinfected). Weather conditions, short application time and erroneous human behaviour substantially affected the effectiveness of PAAs (P < 0·05). Non-PAA-based disinfectants (either liquid or foam) did not reach comparable efficacy (P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: Peracetic acid was effective at a concentration of 6400-8200 ppm and an application time of 4 min. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The study provides operationally relevant data for the use of PAA-based disinfectants in preparedness planning and management of biological incidents and natural outbreaks.

Department of Biological Defense Military Health Institute Armed Forces Techonin Czech Republic

Department of Informatics and Quantitative Methods Faculty of Informatics and Management University of Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove Czech Republic

Department of Toxicology and Military Pharmacy Faculty of Military Health Sciences University of Defense Hradec Kralove Czech Republic

Health Institute Ústí nad Labem Czech Republic

Population Protection Institute of Fire and Rescue Services Lazne Bohdanec Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Anon. (2011) Technical Brief: Evaluation of Liquid and Foam Decontamination Technologies for Surfaces Contaminated by Bacillus anthracis Spores, vol No. 600S11003. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Anon. (2013) Bio‐Response Operational Testing and Evaluation (BOTE) Project ‐ Phase 1: Decontamination Assessment, vol No. 600/R–13/168. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Anon. (2018) Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra. (No. 572.2). ASABE. https://webstore.ansi.org/Standards/ASABE/ANSIASABES572FEB2020. Accessed 28 Nov 2020.

Archer, J., Karnik, M., Touati, A., Aslett, D. and Abdel‐Hady, A. (2018) Evaluation of Electrostatic Sprayers for Use in a Personnel Decontamination Line Protocol for Biological Contamination Incident Response Operations, No. EPA/600/R‐18/283. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Calfee, M.W., Ryan, S.P., Wood, J.P., Mickelsen, L., Kempter, C., Miller, L., Colby, M., Touati, A.et al. (2012) Laboratory evaluation of large‐scale decontamination approaches. J Appl Microbiol 112, 874–882. PubMed

Casalino, E., Astocondor, E., Sanchez, J.C., Díaz‐Santana, D.E., Del Aguila, C. and Carrillo, J.P. (2015) Personal protective equipment for the Ebola virus disease: a comparison of 2 training programs. Am J Infect Control 43, 1281–1287. PubMed

Chughtai, A.A., Chen, X. and Macintyre, C.R. (2018) Risk of self‐contamination during doffing of personal protective equipment. Am J Infect Control 46, 1329–1334. PubMed

Cohen, M.L. and Whalen, T. (2007) Implications of low level human exposure to respirable B. anthracis . Appl Biosaf 12, 109–115.

Darby, S.M. and Glass, M.J. (2002) Formal Test Report for the Tactical Personnel Biological Decontamination Validation (No. WDTC‐TR‐02‐072). U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground.

Estill, C.F., Baron, P.A., Beard, J.K., Hein, M.J., Larsen, L.D., Rose, L., Schaefer, F.W., Noble‐Wang, J.et al. (2009) Recovery efficiency and limit of detection of aerosolized Bacillus anthracis sterne from environmental surface samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 75, 4297–4306. PubMed PMC

Humphreys, P.N., Finan, P., Rout, S., Hewitt, J., Thistlethwaite, P., Barnes, S. and Pilling, S. (2013) A systematic evaluation of a peracetic‐acid‐based high performance disinfectant. J Infect Prev 14, 126–131.

Kang, J., O’Donnell, J.M., Colaianne, B., Bircher, N., Ren, D. and Smith, K.J. (2017) Use of personal protective equipment among health care personnel: results of clinical observations and simulations. Am J Infect Control 45, 17–23. PubMed

Lutz, J.K., Crawford, J., Hoet, A.E., Wilkins, J.R. and Lee, J. (2013) Comparative performance of contact plates, electrostatic wipes, swabs and a novel sampling device for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus on environmental surfaces. J Appl Microbiol 115, 171–178. PubMed

Majcher, M.R., Bernard, K.A. and Sattar, S.A. (2008) Identification by quantitative carrier test of surrogate spore‐forming bacteria to assess sporicidal chemicals for use against Bacillus anthracis . Appl Environ Microbiol 74, 676–681. PubMed PMC

Nasr, G.G., Yule, A.J., Lloyd, S.E. and Whitehead, A. (2007) The application of fine sprays for chemical, biological, and radiological or nuclear (CBRN) decontamination. In Proceedings of the 21th ILASS‐Europe Meeting. Mugla, Turkey.

Nuyttens, D. (2007). Drift from field crop sprayers: the influence of spray application technology determined using indirect and direct drift assessment means (dissertation). Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, Leuven. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28360407_Drift_from_field_crop_sprayers_the_influence_of_spray_application_technology_determined_using_indirect_and_direct_drift_assessment_means. Accessed 29 Nov 2020.

Omidbakhsh, N. (2010) Evaluation of sporicidal activities of selected environmental surface disinfectants: carrier tests with the spores of Clostridium difficile and its surrogates. Am J Infect Control 38, 718–722. PubMed

Parks, S., Gregory, S., Fletcher, N., Pottage, T., Thompson, K.‐A., Lakeman, J., Jhutty, A., Walker, J.T.et al. (2013) Showering BSL‐4 suits to remove biological contamination. Appl Biosaf 18, 162–171.

Piepel, G., Hutchison, J., Kaiser, B.D., Amidan, B., Sydor, M. and Barrett, C. (2016) Recovery Efficiency, False Negative Rate, and Limit of Detection Performance of a Validated Macrofoam‐Swab Sampling Method with Low Surface Concentrations of Two Bacillus anthracis Surrogates (No. PNNL‐23955, Rev. 1). Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. PubMed

Rutala, W.A. and Weber, D.J. (2008) Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rybka, A., Gavel, A., Prazak, P., Meloun, J. and Pejchal, J. (2019) Decontamination of CBRN units contaminated by highly contagious biological agents. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol Cas Spolecnosti Epidemiol Mikrobiol Ceske Lek Spolecnosti JE Purkyne 68, 40–45. PubMed

Springthorpe, V.S. and Sattar, S.A. (2005) Carrier tests to assess microbicidal activities of chemical disinfectants for use on medical devices and environmental surfaces. J AOAC Int 88, 182–201. PubMed

Suwantarat, N. and Apisarnthanarak, A. (2015) Risks to healthcare workers with emerging diseases: lessons from MERS‐CoV, Ebola, SARS, and avian flu. Curr Opin Infect Dis 28, 349–361. PubMed

Votava, M., Slitrová, J. and Matusková, Z. (2005) Microbicidal efficacy of a new foam disinfectant [in Czech]. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol 54, 84–89. PubMed