Nesting of Ceratina nigrolabiata, a biparental bee
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
33658547
PubMed Central
PMC7930280
DOI
10.1038/s41598-021-83940-4
PII: 10.1038/s41598-021-83940-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- hnízdění fyziologie MeSH
- larva růst a vývoj MeSH
- pyl chemie MeSH
- sexuální chování zvířat fyziologie MeSH
- stravovací zvyklosti fyziologie MeSH
- včely fyziologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Biparental care is very rare in insects, and it was well-documented in only one bee species to this date - Ceratina nigrolabiata. However, biparental care was only recently discovered in this species, and detailed description of natural history of this species is missing. Here, we describe the nesting cycle of C. nigrolabiata. Pairs of C. nigrolabiata are established before female starts offspring provisioning. After provisioning is finished (when youngest offspring reached larval stage), the male abandons the nest. Males which are present in nests where female already finished provisioning brood cells, are probably mainly temporary visitors. The female can perform long-time offspring guarding, but only 22% of completely provisioned nests are guarded by a female. Most nests (54%) are closed and abandoned, when provisioning is completed, and other (24%) are orphaned before provisioning is finished. Guarded nests have statistically higher number of brood cells provisioned than unguarded nests. Generally, C. nigrolabiata is unique among bees due to its biparental behavior, but it has also uncommon traits of nesting biology among Ceratina bees, e.g. fast offspring development in comparison with provisioning rate, and high proportion of nests which are closed and abandoned by mother.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Alonso-Alvarez, C. & Velando, A. Benefits and costs of parental care. Evol. Parent. Care 40–61 (2012).
Olmstead KL, Wood TK. The effect of clutch size and ant attendance on egg guarding by Entylia bactriana (Homoptera: Membracidae) Psyche (Stuttg.) 1990;97:111–120. doi: 10.1155/1990/40278. DOI
Tallamy DW, Wood TK. Convergence patterns in subsocial insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1986;31:369–390. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.31.010186.002101. DOI
Wong JWY, Meunier J, Kölliker M. The evolution of parental care in insects: the roles of ecology, life history and the social environment. Ecol. Entomol. 2013;38:123–137. doi: 10.1111/een.12000. DOI
Field J, Turner E, Fayle T, Foster WA. Costs of egg-laying and offspring provisioning: multifaceted parental investment in a digger wasp. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2007;274:445–451. PubMed PMC
Smith, C. C. & Fretwell, S. D. The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am. Nat. 499–506 (1974).
Strohm E, Linsenmair KE. Allocation of parental investment among individual offspring in the European beewolf Philanthus triangulum F. (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2000;69:173–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01197.x. DOI
Kölliker M. Benefits and costs of earwig (Forficula auricularia) family life. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2007;61:1489–1497. doi: 10.1007/s00265-007-0381-7. DOI
Smiseth PT, Kölliker M, Royle NJ. What is parental care? In: Royle NJ, Smiseth PT, Kölliker M, editors. The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 1–17.
Stearns S. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc.; 1992.
Reynolds JD. Animal breeding systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996;11:68–72. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)81045-7. PubMed DOI
Suzuki, S. Biparental care in insects: paternal care, life history, and the function of the nest. J. Insect Sci.13 (2013). PubMed PMC
Thomas GH, Székely T. Evolutionary pathways in shorebird breeding systems: sexual conflict, parental care, and chick development. Evolution. 2005;59:2222–2230. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00930.x. PubMed DOI
Trumbo ST. Patterns of parental care in invertebrates. In: Royle NJ, Smiseth PT, Kölliker M, editors. The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 81–100.
Gilbert JDJ, Manica A. The evolution of parental care in insects: a test of current hypotheses. Evolution. 2015;69:1255–1270. doi: 10.1111/evo.12656. PubMed DOI PMC
Reynolds JD, Goodwin NB, Freckleton RP. Evolutionary transitions in parental care and live bearing in vertebrates. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2002;357:269–281. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0930. PubMed DOI PMC
Hunt A, Simmons LW. Behavioural dynamics of biparental care in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Anim. Behav. 2002;64:65–75. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2002.3036. DOI
Royle NJ. Parental care: when the sex has to stop. Curr. Biol. 2016;26:R478–R480. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.052. PubMed DOI
Zeh, D. W. & Smith, R. L. Paternal investment by terrestrial arthropods. Am. Zool. 785–805 (1985).
Michener CD. The Bees of the World. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007.
Hughes WO, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FL. Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science. 2008;320:1213–1216. doi: 10.1126/science.1156108. PubMed DOI
Wilson EO. The Insect Societies. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1971.
Ross L, Gardner A, Hardy N, West SA. Ecology, not the genetics of sex determination, determines who helps in eusocial populations. Curr. Biol. 2013;23:2383–2387. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.013. PubMed DOI
Cameron SA. Brood care by males of Polistes major (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 1986;59:183–185.
Hunt J, Noonan CK. Larval feeding by male Polistes fuscatus and Polistes metricus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) Insectes Sociaux. 1979;26:247–251. doi: 10.1007/BF02223803. DOI
Lucas ER, Field J. Active and effective nest defence by males in a social apoid wasp. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2011;65:1499–1504. doi: 10.1007/s00265-011-1159-5. DOI
Cameron SA. Brood care by male bumble bees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1985;82:6371–6373. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.19.6371. PubMed DOI PMC
Sen R, Gadagkar R. Males of the social wasp Ropalidia marginata can feed larvae, given an opportunity. Anim. Behav. 2006;71:345–350. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.04.022. DOI
Brockmann, H. J. Male behavior, courtship and nesting in Trypoxylon (Trypargilum) monteverdeae (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 66–84 (1992).
Coville RE, Coville PL. Nesting biology and male behavior of Trypoxylon (Trypargilum) tenoctitlan in Costa Rica (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1980;73:110–119. doi: 10.1093/aesa/73.1.110. DOI
Brockmann HJ, Grafen A. Mate conflict and male behaviour in a solitary wasp, Trypoxylon (Trypargilum) politum (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) Anim. Behav. 1989;37:232–255. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(89)90113-9. DOI
Mikát M, et al. Polyandrous bee provides extended offspring care biparentally as an alternative to monandry based eusociality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2019;116:6238–6243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810092116. PubMed DOI PMC
Sakagami SF, Laroca S. Observations on the bionomics of some neotropical xylocopine bees, with comparative and biofaunistic notes (Hymenoptera, Anthophoridae) J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. Ser. VI Zool. 1971;18:57–127.
Rehan SM, Richards MH. Nesting biology and subsociality in Ceratina calcarata (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Can. Entomol. 2010;142:65–74. doi: 10.4039/n09-056. DOI
Mikát M, Černá K, Straka J. Major benefits of guarding behavior in subsocial bees: implications for social evolution. Ecol. Evol. 2016;6:6784–6797. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2387. PubMed DOI PMC
Mikát M, Franchino C, Rehan SM. Sociodemographic variation in foraging behavior and the adaptive significance of worker production in the facultatively social small carpenter bee, Ceratina calcarata. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2017;71:135. doi: 10.1007/s00265-017-2365-6. DOI
Mikát, M., Benda, D. & Straka, J. Maternal investment in a bee species with facultative nest guarding and males heavier than females. Ecol. Entomol. (2019).
Buschini MLT, Donatti AJ. Nesting behavior of Trypoxylon (Trypargilum) agamemnom Richards (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) Braz. J. Biol. 2012;72:353–362. doi: 10.1590/S1519-69842012000200017. PubMed DOI
Stubblefield, J. W. & Seger, J. Sexual dimorphism in the Hymenoptera. in The differences between the sexes. 71–103 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).
Portman ZM. Nest guarding by male bees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2019;116:9711–9712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904787116. PubMed DOI PMC
Dillard JR. High rates of extra-pair paternity in a socially monogamous beetle with biparental care. Ecol. Entomol. 2017;42:1–10. doi: 10.1111/een.12346. DOI
Coville, R. E. & Griswold, C. Nesting biology of Trypoxylon xanthandrum in Costa Rica with observations on its spider prey (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae; Araneae: Senoculidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 205–216 (1983).
Houston TF, Maynard GV. An unusual new paracolletine bee, Leioproctus (Ottocolletes) muelleri subgen. & sp. nov. (Hymenoptera: Colletidae): with notes on nesting biology and in-burrow nest guarding by macrocephalic males. Aust. J. Entomol. 2012;51:248–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.2012.00867.x. DOI
van Veen JW, Sommeijer MJ, Meeuwsen F. Behaviour of drones in Melipona (Apidae, Meliponinae) Insectes Soc. 1997;44:435–447. doi: 10.1007/s000400050063. DOI
Kukuk PF, Ward SA, Jozwiak A. Mutualistic benefits generate an unequal distribution of risky activities among unrelated group members. Naturwissenschaften. 1998;85:445–449. doi: 10.1007/s001140050528. DOI
Zink AG. Quantifying the costs and benefits of parental care in female treehoppers. Behav. Ecol. 2003;14:687–693. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arg044. DOI
Trivers RL. Parent-offspring conflict. Am. Zool. 1974;14:249–264. doi: 10.1093/icb/14.1.249. DOI
Cowan, D. P. The solitary and presocial Vespidae. Soc. Biol. Wasps 33–73 (1991).
Gess SK, Gess FW. Wasps and Bees in Southern Africa. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute Pretoria; 2014.
Stegmann UE, Linsenmair KE. Assessing the semelparity hypothesis: egg-guarding and fecundity in the malaysian treehopper Pyrgauchenia tristaniopsis. Ethology. 2002;108:857–869. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00818.x. DOI
Tallamy, D. W. & Brown, W. P. (Department E. and A. E. Semelparity and the evolution of maternal care in insects. Anim. Behav. U. K. (1999). PubMed
Székely, T., Webb, J. N., Houston, A. I. & McNamara, J. M. An evolutionary approach to offspring desertion in birds. in Current Ornithology 271–330 (Springer, Boston, MA, 1996). 10.1007/978-1-4615-5881-1_6.
Daly HV, Stage GI, Brown T. Natural enemies of bees of the genus Ceratina (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1967;60:1273–1282. doi: 10.1093/aesa/60.6.1273. DOI
R. Core Developmental Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2016).