Undiscovered gene-to-gene interaction (epistasis) is a possible explanation for the "missing heritability" of complex traits and diseases. On a genome-wide scale, screening for epistatic effects among all possible pairs of genetic markers faces two main complications. Firstly, the classical statistical methods for modeling epistasis are computationally very expensive, which makes them impractical on such large scale. Secondly, straightforward corrections for multiple testing using the classical methods tend to be too coarse and inefficient at discovering the epistatic effects in such a large scale application. In this chapter, we describe both the underlying framework and practical examples of two-stage statistical testing methods that alleviate both of the aforementioned complications.

Prague Czech Republic

Radboudumc Nijmegen The Netherlands

See more in PubMed

Freidlin B, Zheng G, Li Z, Gastwirth JL (2002) Trend tests for case-control studies of genetic markers: power, sample size and robustness. Hum Hered 53:146–152 DOI

Goeman JJ, Solari A (2014) Multiple hypothesis testing in genomics. Stat Med 33(11):1946–1978 DOI

Goldstein P, Korol AB, Reiner-Benaim A (2014) Two-stage genome-wide search for epistasis with implementation to recombinant inbred lines (RIL) populations. PLoS ONE, 9(12):e115680 DOI

Hemani G, Theocharidis A, Wei W, Haley C (2011) EpiGPU: exhaustive pairwise epistasis scans parallelized on consumer level graphics cards. Bioinformatics 27(11):1462–1465 DOI

Herold C, Steffens M, Brockschmidt FF, Baur MP, Becker T (2009) INTERSNP: genome-wide interaction analysis guided by a priori information. Bioinformatics 25(24):3275–3281 DOI

Jin XWL, Xiong M (2008) Composite measure of linkage disequilibrium for testing interaction between unlinked loci. Eur J Hum Genet 16:644–651 DOI

Kam-Thong T et al (2011) EPIBLASTER - fast exhaustive two-locus epistasis detection strategy using graphical processing units. Eur J Hum Genet 19:465–471 DOI

Kooperberg C, Hsu L (2015) powerGWASinteraction: power calculations for G×E and g×g interactions for GWAS (R package). https://cran.r-project.org/package=powerGWASinteraction

Kooperberg C, LeBlanc M (2008) Increasing the power of identifying gene×gene interactions in genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol 32(3):255–263 DOI

Lewinger JP, Morrison JL, Thomas DC, Murcray CE, Conti DV, Li D, Gauderman WJ (2013) Efficient two-step testing of gene-gene interactions in genomewide association studies. Genet Epidemiol 37(5):440–451 DOI

Li J, Horstman B, Chen Y (2011) Detecting epistatic effects in association studies at a genomic level based on an ensemble approach. Bioinformatics 27(13):i222–i229 DOI

Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, McCarthy MI, Ramos EM, Cardon LR, Chakravarti A, Cho JH, Guttmacher AE, Kong A, Kruglyak L, Mardis E, Rotimi CN, Slatkin M, Valle D, Whittemore AS, Boehnke M, Clark AG, Eichler EE, Gibson G, Haines JL, Mackay TF, McCarroll SA, Visscher PM (2009) Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461:747–753 DOI

Marchini J, Donnelly P, Cardon LR (2005) Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases. Nat Genet 37:413–417 DOI

Niel C, Sinoquet C, Dina C, Rocheleau G (2015) A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection. Front Genet 6(285):1–19

Pecanka J (2016) Multi-step statistical methods for simultaneous inference in genetics. PhD thesis, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Pecanka J, Jonker MA, International Parkinson’s Disease Genomics Consortium (IPDGC), Bochdanovits Z, van der Vaart A (2017) A powerful and efficient two-stage method for detecting gene-to-gene interactions in GWAS. Biostatistics 18(3):477–494 DOI

Phillips PC (2008) Epistasis - the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nat Rev Genet 9:855–867 DOI

Piriyapongsa J, Ngamphiw C, Intarapanich A, Kulawonganunchai S, Assawamakin A, Bootchai C, Shaw PJ, Tongsima S (2012) iLOCi: a SNP interaction prioritization technique for detecting epistasis in genome-wide association studies. BMC Genomics 13(Suppl 7):S2 DOI

Shang J, Zhang J, Lei X, Zhao W, Dong Y (2013) EpiSIM: simulation of multiple epistasis, linkage disequilibrium patterns and haplotype blocks for genome-wide interaction analysis. Genes Genomics 35(3):305–316 DOI

Tang W, Wu X, Jiang R, Li Y (2008) Epistatic module detection for case-control studies: a Bayesian model with a Gibbs sampling strategy. PLoS Genet 5(5), e1000464 DOI

Wade MJ, Winther RG, Agrawal AF, Goodnight CJ (2001) Alternative definitions of epistasis: dependence and interaction. Trends Ecol Evol 16(9):498–504 DOI

Wan X, Yang C, Yang Q, Xue H, Fan X, Tang NLS, Yu W (2010) BOOST: a fast approach to detecting gene-gene interactions in genome-wide case-control studies. Am J Hum Genet 87:325–340 DOI

Zhang B (2006) A score test under logistic regression models based on case-control data. Stat Neerl 60(4):477–496 DOI

Zhao J, Jin L, Xiong AM (2006) Test for interaction between two unlinked loci. Am J Hum Genet 79:831–845 DOI

Zheng G, Yang Y, Zhu X, Elston RC (2012) Analysis of genetic association studies. Springer, New York DOI