Effect of prior treatments on selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu dopisy, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
33849608
PubMed Central
PMC8045319
DOI
10.1186/s13045-021-01071-9
PII: 10.1186/s13045-021-01071-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Exportin-1, Multiple myeloma, SINE compound, Selinexor,
- MeSH
- bortezomib farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- dexamethason farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- hydraziny farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- triazoly farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- dopisy MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- bortezomib MeSH
- dexamethason MeSH
- hydraziny MeSH
- selinexor MeSH Prohlížeč
- triazoly MeSH
Therapeutic regimens for previously treated multiple myeloma (MM) may not provide prolonged disease control and are often complicated by significant adverse events, including peripheral neuropathy. In patients with previously treated MM in the Phase 3 BOSTON study, once weekly selinexor, once weekly bortezomib, and 40 mg dexamethasone (XVd) demonstrated a significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS), higher response rates, deeper responses, a trend to improved survival, and reduced incidence and severity of bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy when compared with standard twice weekly bortezomib and 80 mg dexamethasone (Vd). The pre-specified analyses described here evaluated the influence of the number of prior lines of therapy, prior treatment with lenalidomide, prior proteasome inhibitor (PI) therapy, prior immunomodulatory drug therapy, and prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) on the efficacy and safety of XVd compared with Vd. In this 1:1 randomized study, enrolled patients were assigned to receive once weekly oral selinexor (100 mg) with once weekly subcutaneous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) and 40 mg per week dexamethasone (XVd) versus standard twice weekly bortezomib and 80 mg per week dexamethasone (Vd). XVd significantly improved PFS, overall response rate, time-to-next-treatment, and showed reduced all grade and grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy compared with Vd regardless of prior treatments, but the benefits of XVd over Vd were more pronounced in patients treated earlier in their disease course who had either received only one prior therapy, had never been treated with a PI, or had prior ASCT. Treatment with XVd improved outcomes as compared to Vd regardless of prior therapies as well as manageable and generally reversible adverse events. XVd was associated with clinical benefit and reduced peripheral neuropathy compared to standard Vd in previously treated MM. These results suggest that the once weekly XVd regimen may be optimally administered to patients earlier in their course of disease, as their first bortezomib-containing regimen, and in those relapsing after ASCT.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03110562). Registered 12 April 2017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03110562 .
Alexandra Hospital School of Medicine National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
Baylor University Medical Center Dallas TX USA
Charbonneau Cancer Research Institute University of Calgary Calgary AB USA
Charles University and General Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Cherkassy Regional Oncological Center Cherkassy Ukraine
CHU Lille Service Des Maladies du Sang 59000 Lille France
City Clinical Hospital 40 Moscow Russian Federation
City Clinical Hospital No 4 of Dnipro City Council Dnipro Ukraine
Cross Cancer Institute University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada
Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA
Department of Hematology CHU La Miletrie and Inserm CIC 1402 Poitiers France
Department of Hematooncology University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
General Hospital Evangelismos Athens Greece
Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Maryland Baltimore MD USA
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca Salamanca Spain
Hotel Dieu University Hospital Nantes France
Imperial College London London UK
Institute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine of NAMS of Ukraine Lviv Ukraine
Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc Newton MA USA
Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Medical University of Silesia Katowice Poland
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
National Cancer Institute Kiev Ukraine
Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital Kolkata India
Norton Cancer Institute St Matthews Campus Louisville KY USA
Seràgnoli Institute of Hematology Bologna University School of Medicine Bologna Italy
Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
St Vincent's Hospital University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC Australia
State Cancer Institute Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences Patna India
Tisch Cancer Institute Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Nijhof IS, van de Donk NWCJ, Zweegman S, Lokhorst HM. Current and new therapeutic strategies for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: an update. Drugs. 2018;78:19–37. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0841-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Anderson KC. Progress and paradigms in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:5419–5427. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0625. PubMed DOI PMC
Chari A, Vogl DT, Gavriatopoulou M, Nooka AK, Yee AJ, Huff CA, et al. Oral selinexor-dexamethasone for triple-class refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:727–738. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903455. PubMed DOI
Grosicki S, Simonova M, Spicka I, Pour L, Kriachok I, Gavriatopoulou M, et al. Once-per-week selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus twice-per-week bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma (BOSTON): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396:1563–1573. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32292-3. PubMed DOI
Bahlis NJ, Sutherland H, White D, Sebag M, Lentzsch S, Kotb R, et al. Selinexor plus low-dose bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132:2546–2554. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-06-858852. PubMed DOI PMC
Chari A, Suvannasankha A, Fay JW, Arnulf B, Kaufman JL, Ifthikharuddin JJ, et al. Daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2017;130:974–981. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-05-785246. PubMed DOI PMC
Gasparetto C, Lipe B, Tuchman S, Callander NS, Lentzsch S, Baljevic M, et al. Once weekly selinexor, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone (SKd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:8530–8530. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.8530. DOI
Jakubowiak AJ, Jasielec JK, Rosenbaum CA, Cole CE, Chari A, Mikhael J, et al. Phase 1 study of selinexor plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2019;186:549–560. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15969. PubMed DOI PMC
White DJ, Lentzsch S, Gasparetto C, Bahlis N, Chen CI, Lipe BC, et al. Safety and efficacy of the combination of selinexor, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (SRd) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2019;134:3165–3165. doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-124370. DOI
Richardson PG, Xie W, Mitsiades C, Chanan-Khan AA, Lonial S, Hassoun H, et al. Single-agent bortezomib in previously untreated multiple myeloma: efficacy, characterization of peripheral neuropathy, and molecular correlations with response and neuropathy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3518–3525. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.3087. PubMed DOI PMC
Velasco R, Alberti P, Bruna J, Psimaras D, Argyriou AA. Bortezomib and other proteosome inhibitors—induced peripheral neurotoxicity: from pathogenesis to treatment. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2019;24:S52–62. doi: 10.1111/jns.12338. PubMed DOI
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2016 in: Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Volume 14 Issue 4 (2016) [Internet]. [cited 2020 Feb 5]. https://jnccn.org/view/journals/jnccn/14/4/article-p389.xml PubMed PMC
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03110562