What's in the water? - Target and suspect screening of contaminants of emerging concern in raw water and drinking water from Europe and Asia
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
33930794
DOI
10.1016/j.watres.2021.117099
PII: S0043-1354(21)00297-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Contaminants of emerging concern, Drinking water, High-resolution mass spectrometry, Removal efficiency, Suspect screening, Water treatment,
- MeSH
- Water Pollutants, Chemical * analysis MeSH
- Water Purification * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Environmental Monitoring MeSH
- Drinking Water * analysis MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Asia MeSH
- Europe MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Water Pollutants, Chemical * MeSH
- Drinking Water * MeSH
There is growing worry that drinking water can be affected by contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), potentially threatening human health. In this study, a wide range of CECs (n = 177), including pharmaceuticals, pesticides, perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and other compounds, were analysed in raw water and in drinking water collected from drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) in Europe and Asia (n = 13). The impact of human activities was reflected in large numbers of compounds detected (n = 115) and high variation in concentrations in the raw water (range 15-7995 ng L-1 for ∑177CECs). The variation was less pronounced in drinking water, with total concentration ranging from 35 to 919 ng L-1. Treatment efficiency was on average 65 ± 28%, with wide variation between different DWTPs. The DWTP with the highest ∑CEC concentrations in raw water had the most efficient treatment procedure (average treatment efficiency 89%), whereas the DWTP with the lowest ∑177CEC concentration in the raw water had the lowest average treatment efficiency (2.3%). Suspect screening was performed for 500 compounds ranked high as chemicals of concern for drinking water, using a prioritisation tool (SusTool). Overall, 208 features of interest were discovered and three were confirmed with reference standards. There was co-variation between removal efficiency in DWTPs for the target compounds and the suspected features detected using suspect screening, implying that removal of known contaminants can be used to predict overall removal of potential CECs for drinking water production. Our results can be of high value for DWTPs around the globe in their planning for future treatment strategies to meet the increasing concern about human exposure to unknown CECs present in their drinking water.
Aigües de Barcelona EMGCIA S A General Batet 1 7 08028 Barcelona Spain
Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht Institute of Coastal Research 21502 Geesthacht Germany
KWR Water Research Institute 3430BB Nieuwegein The Netherlands
Lereti S p A Via Somigliana 10 22100 Como Italy
Université Grenoble Alpes IRD CNRS Grenoble INP IGE 38 050 Grenoble France
Water Environmental and Food Chemistry Unit Carrer Jordi Girona 18 26 Barcelona 08034 Spain
References provided by Crossref.org
Selected neonicotinoids and associated risk for aquatic organisms
Novel nontarget LC-HRMS-based approaches for evaluation of drinking water treatment