Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure With Recovered Ejection Fraction
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
K08 HL136850
NHLBI NIH HHS - United States
K23 HL143156
NHLBI NIH HHS - United States
K23 HL150322
NHLBI NIH HHS - United States
UL1 TR002538
NCATS NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
33950162
PubMed Central
PMC8100912
DOI
10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0939
PII: 2779634
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- dysfunkce levé srdeční komory patofyziologie MeSH
- hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- kvalita života * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- obnova funkce fyziologie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- srdeční selhání patofyziologie MeSH
- tepový objem * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
IMPORTANCE: Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) is a recently recognized phenotype of patients with a history of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) that has subsequently normalized. It is unknown whether such LVEF improvement is associated with improvements in health status. OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) whose LVEF normalized, compared with those whose LVEF remains reduced and those with HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital from November 2016 to December 2018. Consecutive patients seen in a heart failure clinic who completed patient-reported outcome assessments were included. Clinical data were abstracted from the electronic health record. Data analysis was completed from February to December 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Changes in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score, Visual Analog Scale score, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System domain scores on physical function, fatigue, depression, and satisfaction with social roles over 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The study group included 319 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.4 [15.5] years; 120 women [37.6%]). At baseline, 212 patients (66.5%) had HFrEF and 107 (33.5%) had HFpEF. At a median follow-up of 366 (interquartile range, 310-421) days, LVEF had increased to 50% or more in 35 patients with HFrEF (16.5%). Recovery of systolic function was associated with heart failure-associated quality-of-life improvement, such that for each 10% increase in LVEF, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score improved by an mean (SD) of 4.8 (1.6) points (P = .003). Recovery of LVEF was also associated with improvement of physical function, satisfaction with social roles, and a reduction in fatigue. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with HFrEF in this study, normalization of left ventricular systolic function was associated with a significant improvement in health-related quality of life.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Utah Health Salt Lake City
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Now with Xcenda Warrensburg Missouri
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City Missouri
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Basuray A, French B, Ky B, et al. . Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction: clinical description, biomarkers, and outcomes. Circulation. 2014;129(23):2380-2387. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006855 PubMed DOI PMC
Punnoose LR, Givertz MM, Lewis EF, Pratibhu P, Stevenson LW, Desai AS. Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction: a distinct clinical entity. J Card Fail. 2011;17(7):527-532. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.03.005 PubMed DOI
Spertus JA, Jones PG. Development and validation of a short version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015;8(5):469-476. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001958 PubMed DOI PMC
Pokharel Y, Khariton Y, Tang Y, et al. . Association of serial Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire assessments with death and hospitalization in patients with heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction: a secondary analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(12):1315-1321. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3983 PubMed DOI PMC
Stehlik J, Rodriguez-Correa C, Spertus JA, et al. . Implementation of real-time assessment of patient-reported outcomes in a heart failure clinic: a feasibility study. J Card Fail. 2017;23(11):813-816. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.09.009 PubMed DOI
Kalogeropoulos AP, Fonarow GC, Georgiopoulou V, et al. . Characteristics and outcomes of adult outpatients with heart failure and improved or recovered ejection fraction. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(5):510-518. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1325 PubMed DOI
Lupón J, Díez-López C, de Antonio M, et al. . Recovered heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and outcomes: a prospective study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19(12):1615-1623. doi:10.1002/ejhf.824 PubMed DOI
Chang KW, Beri N, Nguyen NH, et al. . Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction in African Americans: results from the African-American Heart Failure Trial. J Card Fail. 2018;24(5):303-309. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.09.005 PubMed DOI
Agra Bermejo R, Gonzalez Babarro E, López Canoa JN, et al. . Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction: clinical characteristics, determinants and prognosis, CARDIOCHUS-CHOP registry. Cardiol J. 2018;25(3):353-362. doi:10.5603/CJ.a2017.0103 PubMed DOI
Rumsfeld JS, Alexander KP, Goff DC Jr, et al. ; American Heart Association Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Stroke Council . Cardiovascular health: the importance of measuring patient-reported health status, a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127(22):2233-2249. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182949a2e PubMed DOI
Spertus J, Peterson E, Conard MW, et al. ; Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium . Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: a comparison of methods. Am Heart J. 2005;150(4):707-715. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.010 PubMed DOI
Butler J, Khan MS, Mori C, et al. . Minimal clinically important difference in quality of life scores for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(6):999-1005. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1810 PubMed DOI
Joyce E, Chung C, Badloe S, et al. . Variable contribution of heart failure to quality of life in ambulatory heart failure with reduced, better, or preserved ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4(3):184-193. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2015.12.011 PubMed DOI
Integration of Patient Reported Quality-of-life Data into Risk Assessment in Heart Failure