OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare two different modes of ventilation in maintaining oxygen saturation (SpO2) in target range (90%-95%) in ventilated preterm infants cared for with automatic control of oxygen delivery (A-FiO2). DESIGN: A single-centre randomised crossover study. SETTINGS: A level III neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Preterm infants receiving mechanical ventilation and oxygen requirement >21%. INTERVENTIONS: Volume guarantee (VG) vs volume controlled ventilation (VCV) modes with automatic oxygen control (A-FiO2). OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of this study was the proportion of time spent with oxygen saturations in the target range (90%-95%) . RESULTS: Nineteen preterm infants with a median gestation age 25 weeks (IQR: 24-28) and birth weight 685 g (IQR: 595-980) were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in primary outcome of median proportion of time spent in target saturation between the two arms (72% (57-81) in VG vs 75% (58-83) in VCV; p=0.98). There was no significant difference in the secondary outcomes of time spent in SpO2 <80% (0.03% vs 0.14%; p=0.51), time spent in SpO2 >98% (0.50% vs 0.08%; p=0.54), the median FiO2 (31% vs 29%; p=0.51) or manual adjustments carried out between VG and VCV, respectively. The number of episodes of prolonged hypoxaemia and hyperoxaemia were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in time spent in target SpO2 range between VG and VCV when A-FiO2 was used as the FiO2 controller in this crossover randomised control study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03865069.

Biomedical Technology Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic

Medtrx org Lake Arrowhead California USA

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough UK

Translational and Clinical Research Institute Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03865069